PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY BETWEEN ARTHROCENTESIS AND OPERATIVE ARTHROSCOPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT INTERNAL DERANGEMENT
Atteya, A., Warda, M., Fata, M., Medra, A., Gil, F. (2021). PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY BETWEEN ARTHROCENTESIS AND OPERATIVE ARTHROSCOPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT INTERNAL DERANGEMENT. EKB Journal Management System, 46(Issue 1), 58-65. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.25155.1051
Aly Mohamed Atteya; Mohamed Hussein Warda; Mohamed Mohamed Fata; Ahmed Mohamed Medra; Florencio Monje Gil. "PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY BETWEEN ARTHROCENTESIS AND OPERATIVE ARTHROSCOPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT INTERNAL DERANGEMENT". EKB Journal Management System, 46, Issue 1, 2021, 58-65. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.25155.1051
Atteya, A., Warda, M., Fata, M., Medra, A., Gil, F. (2021). 'PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY BETWEEN ARTHROCENTESIS AND OPERATIVE ARTHROSCOPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT INTERNAL DERANGEMENT', EKB Journal Management System, 46(Issue 1), pp. 58-65. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.25155.1051
Atteya, A., Warda, M., Fata, M., Medra, A., Gil, F. PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY BETWEEN ARTHROCENTESIS AND OPERATIVE ARTHROSCOPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT INTERNAL DERANGEMENT. EKB Journal Management System, 2021; 46(Issue 1): 58-65. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.25155.1051

PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY BETWEEN ARTHROCENTESIS AND OPERATIVE ARTHROSCOPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT INTERNAL DERANGEMENT

Alexandria Dental Journal
Article 9, Volume 46, Issue 1, April 2021, Page 58-65  XML PDF (633.43 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.25155.1051
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Aly Mohamed Atteya email 1; Mohamed Hussein Warda2; Mohamed Mohamed Fata3; Ahmed Mohamed Medra3; Florencio Monje Gil4
1Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery , Faculty of Dentistry , Alexandria University ,Alexandria , Egypt
2Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery , Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University , Alexandria, Egypt
3Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
4Oral and maxillofacial surgery , Faculty of Medicine, Extremadura University, Badajoz, Spain
Abstract
Introduction: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are common conditions and internal derangement is the most common among them. Different methods have been suggested for treatment , beginning with conservative approaches ending with surgery. Nowadays, arthrocentesis and arthroscopy have decreased the need of the more complex surgical procedures. Despite such advancements, there is deficiency in the literature regarding prospective, randomized, clinical studies supporting either both of them. In doing the necessary studies, and comparing the results, it will be essential to develop a standardized criteria for patient selection and treatment options that can be used by all investigators.
Objectives: To compare between arthrocentesis and operative arthroscopy in the management of patients with internal derangement of temporomandibular joint stage II and III Wilkes.
Materials and Methods: a prospective study was done on 40 patients with temporomandibular joint internal derangement and were divided into 2 groups, 20 patients were treated with arthrocentesis and 20 patients were treated with operative arthroscopy.
Results: The pain score was significantly lower in operative arthroscopy. The mouth opening was significantly higher in the operative arthroscopy.
Conclusions: Operative arthroscopy is better than arthrocentesis as regards the postoperative pain and mouth opening.
Keywords
TMJ; TMJ arthroscopy; arthroscopy; arthrocentesis; internal derangement
Supplementary Files
References
  1. Zhang S, Liu X, Yang X, Yang C, Chen M, Haddad MS, et al. Temporomandibular joint disc repositioning using bone anchors: an immediate post surgical evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. . BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:262.
  2. Greene CS, Marbach JJ. Epidemiologic studies of mandibular dysfunction: a critical review. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:184-90.
  3. Seifeldin SA, Elhayes KA. Soft versus hard occlusal splint therapy in the management of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Saudi Dent J 2015;27:208-14.
  4. Dolwick MF, Katzberg RW, Helms CA. Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: fact or fiction? J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:415-8.
  5. Gonzalez-Garcia R, Gil-Diez Usandizaga JL, Rodriguez-Campo FJ. Arthroscopic anatomy and lysis and lavage of the temporomandibular joint. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2011;19:131-44.
  6. Wilkes CH. Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Pathological variations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:469-77.
  7. Kiehn CL, Desprez JD. Meniscectomy for internal derangement of temporomandibular joint. Br J Plast Surg 1962;15:199-204.
  8. Farrar WB, McCarty WL Jr. The TMJ dilemma. J Ala Dent Assoc 1979;63:19-26.
  9. Onishi M. [Arthroscopy of the temporomandibular joint (author's transl)]. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi 1975;42:207- 13.
LaskinDM.Temporomandibulardisorders:thepast,present,andfuture.Odontology2007;95:10-5.

    • Laskin D. Surgical management of internal derangements. Temporomandibular disorders: an evidenced-based

    approach to diagnosis and treatment Chicago: Quintessence Publishers 2006:469-81.

    • Murakami KI, Iizuka T, Matsuki M, Ono T. Recapturing the persistent anteriorly displaced disk by mandibular manipulation after pumping and hydraulic pressure to the upper joint cavity of the temporomandibular joint. Cranio

    1987;5:17-24.

    • Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF, Martinez GA. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplified treatment for

    severe, limited mouth opening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:1163-7.

    • Monje-Gil F, Nitzan D, Gonzalez-Garcia R. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis. Review of the

    literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17: 575-81.

    • Celic R, Jerolimov V, Knezovic Zlataric D, Klaic B. Measurement of mandibular movements in patients with

    temporomandibular disorders and in asymptomatic subjects. Coll Antropol 2003;27:43-9.

    • HuskissonEC.Measurementofpain.Lancet1974;2:1127-31.

    • Nitzan DW. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: biologic basis and treatment outcome. In: Stegenga B, de

    Bont LGM, (eds). Management of Temporomandibular Joint Degenerative Diseases: Biologic Basis and

    Treatment Outcome. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel; 1996. pp.113-23.

    • McCain JP, de la Rua H, LeBlanc WG. Puncture technique and portals of entry for diagnostic and operative

    arthroscopy of the temporomandibular joint. Arthroscopy 1991;7:221-32.

    • Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria,

    examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301-55.

    • Okeson J. Etiology and identification of functional disturbances in masticatory system. management of

    temporomandibular joint and occlusion 7th ed: Elsevier; 2013.

    • Al-Moraissi EA, Wolford LM, Ellis E, 3rd, Neff A. The hierarchy of different treatments for arthrogenous

    temporomandibular disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg

    2020;48:9-23.

    • Ahmed N, Sidebottom A, O'Connor M, Kerr HL. Prospective outcome assessment of the therapeutic benefits of

    arthroscopy and arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50:745-8.

    • Al-Moraissi EA. Arthroscopy versus arthrocentesis in the management of internal derangement of the

    temporomandibular joint: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:104-12.

    • MurakamiK,HosakaH,MoriyaY,SegamiN,IizukaT.Short-termtreatmentoutcomestudyforthemanagement of temporomandibular joint closed lock. A comparison of arthrocentesis to nonsurgical therapy and arthroscopic

    lysis and lavage. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:253-7.

    • HobeichJBSZ,IsmailE,SadigWM,HokayemNE,AlmasK.Arthroscopyversusarthrocentesis.Aretrospective

    study of disc displacement management without reduction. Saudi Med J 2007;28:1541-4.

    • Fridrich KL, Wise JM, Zeitler DL. Prospective comparison of arthroscopy and arthrocentesis for

    temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:816-20.

    • GoudotP,JaquinetAR,HugonnetS,HaefligerW,RichterM.Improvementofpainandfunctionafterarthroscopy

    and arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: a comparative study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2000;28:39-43.

    XuY,LinH,ZhuP,ZhouW,HanY,ZhengY,etal.Acomparativestudybetweenuseofarthroscopiclavageand arthrocentesis of temporomandibular joint based on computational fluid dynamics analysis. PLoS One 2013;8:e78953.

    • Tan DBP, Krishnaswamy G. A Retrospective Study of Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement Treated with Arthrocentesis and Arthroscopy. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 2012;21:73-8.

    • Gonzalez-GarciaR,Rodriguez-CampoFJ,Escorial-HernandezV,Munoz-GuerraMF,Sastre-PerezJ,Naval-Gias L, et al. Complications of temporomandibular joint arthroscopy: a retrospective analytic study of 670 arthroscopic procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1587-91.

    Statistics
    Article View: 359
    PDF Download: 542