COMPARISON BETWEEN STANDARD AND WIDEFIELD FLUORESCIEN ANGIOOGRAPHY IN DETECTING NEW VESSELS IN DIABETIC RETINOPATHY PATIENTS | ||||
| ALEXMED ePosters | ||||
| Article 39, Volume 2, Issue 2, October 2020, Page 71-71 | ||||
| Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2020.52316.1081 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
Muhamad Ashraf Barakat 
| ||||
| Department of Ophthalmology, faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| • Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a sight-threatening complication of diabetes and is known to be the leading cause of blindness. • Fluorescein angiography is one of the most important tools for evaluating diabetic retinopathy. • The peripheral retina is the site of many diabetic retinopathy lesions, Therefore evaluation of the retinal periphery is important for screening, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of DR • Conventional (FA) covers retinal area of 30°- 60° in one exposure. Hence it is a time-consuming procedure to angiograph the retinal periphery and it depends on patient`s cooperation and operator`s expertise. • Recently, Heidelberg Spectralis ultra-widefield angiography module was developed and it consists of an interchangeable noncontact 102° lens that attaches to the camera head to provide high-contrast, undistorted and evenly illuminated 102° images in one exposure and at the same time point. Aim of the work: • The aim of this study is to compare the HEIDELBERG SPECTRALIS Standard field 55° lens and UWF 102° lens in diagnosis and evaluation of severity of DR and detection of new vascularization. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Diabetic retinopathy (DR); WIDEFIELD FLUORESCIEN ANGIOOGRAPHY; NEW VESSELS | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 103 |
||||
