Field comparison between droplet distribution and the bioresidual activity of different insecticides against Spodoptera littoralis (boisd) by using certain ground spraying equipment on cotton platns
Bakr, R., Hindy, M., Genidy, N., Ahmed, N., Dar, R. (2014). Field comparison between droplet distribution and the bioresidual activity of different insecticides against Spodoptera littoralis (boisd) by using certain ground spraying equipment on cotton platns. EKB Journal Management System, 7(1), 185-193. doi: 10.21608/eajbsa.2014.13214
Reda Fadeel Ali Bakr; Mohamed A. Hindy; Noha A.M. Genidy; Nevein S.E. Ahmed; Rehab A.A. Dar. "Field comparison between droplet distribution and the bioresidual activity of different insecticides against Spodoptera littoralis (boisd) by using certain ground spraying equipment on cotton platns". EKB Journal Management System, 7, 1, 2014, 185-193. doi: 10.21608/eajbsa.2014.13214
Bakr, R., Hindy, M., Genidy, N., Ahmed, N., Dar, R. (2014). 'Field comparison between droplet distribution and the bioresidual activity of different insecticides against Spodoptera littoralis (boisd) by using certain ground spraying equipment on cotton platns', EKB Journal Management System, 7(1), pp. 185-193. doi: 10.21608/eajbsa.2014.13214
Bakr, R., Hindy, M., Genidy, N., Ahmed, N., Dar, R. Field comparison between droplet distribution and the bioresidual activity of different insecticides against Spodoptera littoralis (boisd) by using certain ground spraying equipment on cotton platns. EKB Journal Management System, 2014; 7(1): 185-193. doi: 10.21608/eajbsa.2014.13214

Field comparison between droplet distribution and the bioresidual activity of different insecticides against Spodoptera littoralis (boisd) by using certain ground spraying equipment on cotton platns

Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. A, Entomology
Article 12, Volume 7, Issue 1, June 2014, Page 185-193  XML PDF (282.64 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/eajbsa.2014.13214
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Reda Fadeel Ali Bakr1; Mohamed A. Hindy2; Noha A.M. Genidy3; Nevein S.E. Ahmed4; Rehab A.A. Dar5
1-Department of Entomology, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University -Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
2Plant Protection Res. Instit. , Agric. Res. Center, Spray Technology Res. Department, Dokki, Giza.
3Department of Entomology, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University
4Central Agricultural Pesticides Laboratory, Agric. Res. Center, Pesticide Residues and Environmental Pollution Research Department.
5Plant Protection Res. Instit. , Agric. Res. Center, Spray Technology Res. Department, Dokki, Giza
Abstract
Field experiments are carried out in an area of about 1.9 feddan planted with cotton plants Giza (89) during season 2005 in 28th June at Kafr Bani Ghrian, Monofia governorate. The selected area was split into 18 plots and control plots. Three products were sprayed with Profenofos, Spinosad and Pyriproxyfen of recommended rate and ¾ recommended rate and one treatment left without spraying as control by using conventional motor sprayer (600 L./Fed.), Motorized Knapsack sprayer (Agromondo) (20L/Fed.) and hand held compression sprayer (Kwazar) (94L/Fed.) for each product the average number of egg-masses of cotton leaf worm/m² was 3. Data indicated that, all tested compounds induce negative influenced on larval survival. The most effective compounds are Profenofos and Pyripoxyfen followed by Spinosad. It could be recommended to use Profenofos and Pyriproxyfen followed by Spinosad with LV spraying equipment with not less than (20L/Fed.) and use ¾ recommended dose which revealed successful results in mortality.
Keywords
cotton plants; Bioresidual activity; Spodoptera littoralis; Profenofos; Pyriproxyfen; Spinosad; LV and Ground Equipment
Statistics
Article View: 195
PDF Download: 252