Referential Choice in the Discourse of Native, Near-Native and Non-Native Speakers of English: Revisiting Kibrik’s Approach

References:

Primary Sources:

Jordan King Abdullah II FULL SPEECH: Ideologies of hate distort the word 'God'. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2x3HkEuH3g

Midyear 2018 Undergraduate Commencement Keynote Speech | Naguib Sawiris. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo3ItNRpF18

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has just addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York. https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2018/09/27/256105/full-text-pms-speech-to-the-united-nations.

Also on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_wew4_C3p8.

Queen Rania Speech The Women's Conference 2007. https://www.queenrania.jo/en/media/speeches/california-governor-and-first-ladys-women%E2%80%99s-conference. Also on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3PEgmlQBpE

Remarks by the President at 9/11 Museum Dedication. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/05/15/remarks-president-911-museum-dedication. Also on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ULtHI3zXXk&feature=emb_title

Secondary Sources:

Carlson, L., Marcu, D. , and Okurowski, M. 2003. Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. In Jan van Kuppevelt and Ronnie Smith (eds.), Current Directions in Discourse and Dialogue. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Chafe, W. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. Subject and topic, ed. by C. N. Li, 25– 56. New York: Academic Press Inc.

Chafe, W.1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Chiarcos, C., & Krasavina, O. 2005. Rhetorical distance revisited: A pilot study. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2005.

El-Zawawy, A. 2016. Studies in contrastive linguistics and stylistics. Novinka: New York.

Fox, B., 1987a. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fox, A. 1983 . Topic continuity in Biblical Hebrew narrative. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 3, 215-254.

Givón, T. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Grosz, B., & Sidner, C. L. .1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational linguistics.

Grüning, A., & Kibrik, A. A. 2005. Modeling referential choice in discourse: A cognitive calculative approach and a neural network approach. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/713378/1/gruening_04.pdf

Hu, J., & Pan, H. (2001, February). Processing local coherence of discourse in centering theory. In Proceedings of the 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (pp. 139-150).

Huggingface, https://huggingface.co.

Kibrik, A. A. 2000. A cognitive calculative approach towards discourse anaphora. In P. Baker, A. Hardie, T. McEnery and A. Siewierska (eds.), Proceedings of the Discourse anaphora and anaphor resolution conference (DAARC2000). Lancaster: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language.

Kibrik, Andrej A., 1999. Reference and working memory: Cognitive inferences from discourse observation. In K. van Hoek, A.A. Kibrik, and L. Noordman (eds.), Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kibrik, A. A. 2000. Cognitive discourse analysis: Some results. Paper presented at the 7^th International Pragmatics Conference. Budapest, July 2000.

Kibrik, A.A., &  Krasavina,O.N.(2005).A corpus study of referential choice: the role of rhetorical structure. Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue”: Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies, eds I.M.Kobozeva, A.S.Narin’jani, and V.P.Selegey (Moscow:Nauka), 561–569.

Kibrik, A.A., Podlesskaja, V.I. (Eds.) .2009. Night Dream Stories: A corpus study of spoken Russian discourse. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul'tur.

Kibrik, A.A., Dobrov,G.B., Zalmanov, D.A., Linnik,A.S., & Loukachevitch, N. V.2010.“Referencial’ nyjvyborkakmnogofaktornyjverojatnostnyjprocess [Referential choiceasamulti-factorial probabilistic process],”in Proceedings of the Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue” (2010), Bekasovo: Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies, ed.A.E. Kibrik (Moscow:Izdatel’stvoRGGU),173–181.

Kibrik, A. A. 2011. Cognitive discourse analysis: local discourse structure. In Slavic linguistics in a cognitive framework (pp. 273-304).

Kibrik, A., & Fedorova, O. 2018, May. A «Portrait» Approach to Multichannel Discourse. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018).

Krasavina, O.N. 2006 .“Multi-factorial choices inspeaking,” in The Second Biennial Conference on Cognitive Science, eds B.M.Velichkovsky,T.V. Chernigovskaya,Yu.I. Aleksandrov, and D.N.Akhapkin (Saint-Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University, Philological Faculty), 86–87.

Krasavina, O.N., & Chiarcos,C. .2007. “PoCoS: potsdam coreference scheme,” in Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Prague, (Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics),156–163.

Mann, W., Christian M., and Sandra A. T. 1992. Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In W. Mann and S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Description. Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Linguapress. http://linguapress.com .

Loukachevitch, N.V., Dobrov, G.B., Kibrik, A.A., Khudyakova, M.V., & Linnik, A.S.2011. “Factors of referential choice: computational modeling,” in Proceedings of the Papers from the Annual International Conference“Dialogue” (2011): Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies, ed. A.E. Kibrik. (Moscow:Izdatel’stvoRGGU),458–467.

Marcu, D. (2000) Extending a formal and computational model of Rhetorical Structure Theory, in Proc. 18th Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING’2000).

Moser, M. and J. Moore (1996) Toward a synthesis of two accounts of discourse structure. Computational Linguistics 22(3):409–419.

Readability Formulas.  https://readabilityformulas.com

Tetreault, J. and J. Allen .2003. An empirical evaluation of pronoun resolution and clausal structure, in Proc. 2003 Int. Symp. on Reference Resolution and its Applications to Question Answering and Summarization, 1–8.

Tomlin, R., 1987. Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M. and Brew, J., 2019. Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771.