Mini-Autogenous Skin Grafts with Skin Homografts Versus Autogenous Skin Graft for Covering Post Burn Wounds in Children | ||||
| The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | ||||
| Article 10, Volume 44, Issue 4, October 2020, Page 535-543 PDF (16.2 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Research article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2020.140022 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Mostafa A Elsobaty* ; Mohamed El Shazly; Awny Askalany; Mahmoud Abdel Aal; Mohamed Elsherif; Mohamed Salah Eldin* | ||||
| The Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: Burns, as a common type of injury in children, have many developed techniques for management of its wounds, but still have many obstacles which meet plastic surgeons. One of these is the lack of the donor sites for autogenous skin grafting especially in large body surface area burns which are unfortunately common in developing countries with limited technical and financial resources. Finding a suitable methodology to address this problem was our main hypothesis in this project. A mixed grafting technique based on using mini-autogenous skin grafts covered with large homogenous skin graft had been investigated for this purpose. Patients and Methods: This study is a prospective study of 20 patients with post burn raw areas who were treated as inpatients at the Burn Unit of Assiut University Hospital, Egypt between September 2017 and September 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group: 1 with 10 children treated by covering the wounds with mini autogenous skin grafts and skin homo grafts and Group: 2 with 10 children treated by the conventional autogenous skin grafts only. Results: The mean age was 6.8±2.3 years, 15 males and 5 females. The mean of the harvested skin in group 1 was 1.7±0.67% vs. 3.3±1.06% for group 2 (p < 0.001). Although the mean time of surgery was significantly longer for patients of group 1, these patients showed significant less bleeding from the site of the donor than the 2nd group. There were non-significant differences between both groups regarding the take of the graft at the recipient site (p=0.476). The hyperpigmentation was significantly higher among patients of group 2 (p=0.024). Conclusion: From this study we advocate the use of mini autogenous skin grafts covered with skin homografts for covering the extensive post burn raw areas in children. It provides the covering for wide raw areas in presence of shortage of the donor sites. It is a valid reliable procedure with easier and less expensive aspects suitable for developing and low-income countries where large wound burns are so common. No specific grants were received by this research from funding agencies in the commercial, public, or not-for-profit sector. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Children burn; Extensive raw area; Unavailability of donor site; Inexpensive | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Pape S.A., Skouras C.A. and Byrne P.O.: An audit of the use of laser Doppler imaging (LDI) in the assessment of burns of intermediate depth. Burns, 27 (3): 233-9, 2001. 2- El Sonbaty M. and El Oteify M.: Epidemiology of burns in Assiut Province, Egypt, during the last two years. Ann. Burns and Fire Disasters, 14: 106-9, 1991. 3- Association A.P.: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. BMC Med., 17: 133-7, 2013. 4- Becker D.: Temporary wound dressing of burns with fresh, sterile, frozen porcine skin. Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters, 11: 171-5, 1998. 5- Adams D.C. and Ramsey M.L.: Grafts in dermatologic surgery: review and update on full-and split-thickness skin grafts, free cartilage grafts, and composite grafts. Dermatologic Surgery, 31: 1055-67, 2005. 6- Turnage R.H., Nwariaku F., Murphy J., Schulman C., Wright K. and Yin H.: Mechanisms of pulmonary microvascular dysfunction during severe burn injury. World Journal of Surgery, 26 (7): 848-53, 2002. 7- Gibson T. and Medawar P.B.: The fate of skin homografts in man. Journal of Anatomy, 77 (Pt 4): 299, 1943. 8- Helton W.S., Fisichella P.M., Berger R., Horgan S., Espat N.J. and Abcarian H.: Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Archives of Surgery, 140 (6): 549-62, 2005. 9- Lumenta D.B., Kamolz L-P. and Frey M.: Adult burn patients with more than 60% TBSA involved-Meek and other techniques to overcome restricted skin harvest availability the Viennese concept. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 30 (2): 231-42, 2009. 10- Quintero E.C., Machado J.F.E. and Robles R.A.D.: Meek micrografting history, indications, technique, physiology and experience: A review article. Journal of Wound Care, 27 (Sup 2): S12-S8, 2018. 11- Tanner J., Vandeput J. and Olley J.: The mesh skin graft. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 34 (3): 287-92, 1964. 12- Medina A., Riegel T., Nystad D. and Tredget E.E.: Modified Meek Micrografting Technique for Wound Coverage in Extensive Burn Injuries. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 37 (5): 305-13, 2016. 13- Ünal S., Ersoz G., Demirkan F., Arslan E., Tütüncü N. and Sari A.: Analysis of skin-graft loss due to infection: Infection-related graft loss. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 55 (1): 102-6, 2005. 14- Ang E.S., Lee S.T., Gan C.S., See P., Chan Y.H., Ng L.H., et al.: The role of alternative therapy in the management of partial thickness burns of the face-experience with the use of moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO) compared with silver sulphadiazine. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 29 (1): 7-10, 2000. 15- Iovanovich J., Tsati E., Tsoutsos D., Frangia K. and Papalois A.: Moist exposed burn therapy: Evaluation of the epithelial repair process (an experimental model). Ann Burns Fire Disast, 13: 3-9, 2000. 16- Wardhana A. and Samiadji M.J.J.P.R.: Clinical Applications of Micro-Skin Grafting for Skin Defect Coverage, 1 (1), 2012 | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 199 PDF Download: 629 |
||||
