EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH A MODIFIED SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE USING XENOGENIC BONE GRAFT (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL) | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 5, Volume 46, Issue 3, December 2021, Page 29-36 PDF (1.25 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.33084.1082 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Lubna F. Elsharkawy  1; Nagy H. Elprince2; Ahmed O. Sweedan3
| ||||
| 1Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
| 2Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| ABSTRACT Background: Modified Socket shield technique, is an approach used to help maintain buccal bone level after implant insertion. However, the significance of bone grafting of the gap between the labial shield and the implant, in improving bone regeneration and prevention of the soft tissue ingrowth, has been described. Aim of the study: Evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes of using xenogenic bone graft on outcome of immediate dental implant placement using the modified socket shield technique. Material and method: 16 patients were divided into two study groups. Control group received an immediate implant with modified socket shield technique. Test group received immediate implant with modified socket shield and bone graft put in the buccal gap. Outcome measurement was primary and secondary implant stability measurement and radiographic evaluation. Results: Peri-implant BMD after 6 months for the test group showed to increase with a % change median of 39.4 % and this was found to be significantly higher than the control group. Implant secondary stability was found to be significantly higher in the test group with a median of 78 ISQ compared to 73 ISQ for the control group. Conclusion: DBBM is effective in healing of peri-implant defect and provides an appropriate stability and enhanced BMD. However, this technique requires proper case selection and is considered highly sensitive. Abbreviations: BMD = bone mineral density, BBH = Buccal bone height, ISQ = Implant stability quotient. . DBBM = Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral.; | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Socket shield technique; gap bone grafting; root preservation | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(3):399–410.
Chen ST, Wilson TG, Hämmerle CHF. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic
basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2004;19:12–25.
Troiano M, Benincasa M, Sánchez P, Calvo-Guirado J. Bundle bone preservation with Root-T-Belt: Case study. Ann Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2014;2(7):1–6.
Mitsias ME, Siormpas KD, Kotsakis GA, Ganz SD, Mangano C, Iezzi G. The Root Membrane Technique: Human Histologic
Evidence after Five Years of Function. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017.
Salama M, Ishikawa T, Salama H, Funato A, Garber D. Advantages of the root submergence technique for pontic site development
in esthetic implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent [Internet]. 2007;27(6):521–7.
Hürzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: A proof-of-principle report.
J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(9):855–62.
Han CH, Park KB, Mangano FG. The modified socket shield technique. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(8):2247–54.
Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites:
Partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(2):122–9.
Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. New osseodensification implant site preparation method to increase bone
density in low-density bone: In vivo evaluation in sheep. Implant Dent. 2016;25(1):24–31.
Du Toit J, Gluckman H. The modified socket-shield technique. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(7):2005–6.
Liu J, Kerns DG. Mechanisms of Guided Bone Regeneration: A Review. Open Dent J. 2014;8(1):56–65.
Pinheiro ALB, Gerbi MEMM. Photoengineering of bone repair processes. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006;24(2):169–78.
Siormpas K, Mitsias M, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, Garber D, Kotsakis G. Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone Utilizing
the “Root-Membrane” Technique: Clinical Results up to 5 Years Postloading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(6):1397–
405.
Shah SA, Khan I, Shah HS. Effectiveness of submucosal dexamethasone to control postoperative pain & swelling in apicectomy
of maxillary anterior teeth. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) [Internet]. 2011;5(2):156–65.
Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: A retrospective
clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2008;8(1).
Yuan D, Wang X, Chen S. Vertical and horizontal dimensional changes of peri‐implant facial bone following immediate placement
and provisionalization with customized definite abutment in maxillary anterior single implants. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2019;30(S19):387–387.
Zhang DZ, Xiao WL, Zhou R, Xue LF, Ma L. Evaluation of bone height and bone mineral density using cone beam computed
tomography after secondary bone graft in alveolar cleft. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(5):1463–6.
Cherel F, Etienne D. Papilla preservation between two implants: A modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped
anatomy? A case report. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2014;45(1):23–30.
Gharpure AS, Bhatavadekar NB. Current evidence on the socket-shield technique: A systematic review. J Oral Implantol.
2017;43(5):395–403.
Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Hürzeler M. Socket Shield Technique for immediate implant placement – clinical, radiographic and
volumetric data after 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(11):1450–8.
Stanley M, Braga FC, Jordao BM. Immediate Loading of Single Implants in the Anterior Maxilla: A 1-Year Prospective Clinical
Study on 34 Patients. Int J Dent. 2017;2017.
Sharma SD, Vidya B, Alexander M, Deshmukh S. Periotome as an Aid to Atraumatic Extraction: A Comparative Double Blind
Randomized Controlled Trial. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015;14(3):611–5.
Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Leone M, Checchi V, Esposito M. Flapless versus open flap implant surgery in partially edentulous
patients subjected to immediate loading: 1-year results from a split-mouth randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol.
2011;4(3):177–88.
El Nahass H, N. Naiem S. Analysis of the dimensions of the labial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: A cone-beam computed
tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):57–61.
Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips
versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2002;18(1):53–8.
Araújo M, Linder E, Lindhe J. Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: An experimental study in dog.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(1):1–6.
Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss®. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2003;14(2):137–43.
Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous Bovine Bone Mineral in Healing of Human Extraction Sockets: 2. Histochemical Observations
at 9 Months. J Periodontol. 2001;72(2):152–9.
Caneva M, Botticelli D, Pantani F, Baffone GM, Rangel IG, Lang NP. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral in marginal defects at
implants installed immediately into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(1):106–
12.
Becker W, Clokie C, Sennerby L, Urist MR, Becker BE. Histologic Findings After Implantation and Evaluation of Different
Grafting Materials and Titanium Micro Screws Into Extraction Sockets: Case Reports. J Periodontol. 1998;69(4):414–21.
Hallman M, Lundgren S, Sennerby L. Histologic analysis of clinical biopsies taken 6 months and 3 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 80% bovine hydroxyapatite and 20% autogenous bone mixed with fibrin glue. Clin Implant Dent Relat
Res. 2001;3(2):87–96.
Hsu KM, Choi BH, Ko CY, Kim HS, Xuan F, Jeong SM. Ridge Alterations following Immediate Implant Placement and the
Treatment of Bone Defects with Bio-Oss in an Animal Model. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(5):690–5.
Jensen T, Schou S, Gundersen HJG, Forman JL, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Bone-to-implant contact after maxillary sinus floor
augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios in mini pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(6):635–44.
Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Correlation between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact: A retrospective histological and histomorphometrical study of seven titanium implants retrieved from humans. Clin Implant Dent
Relat Res. 2006;8(4):218–22.
Andreotti AM, Goiato MC, Nobrega AS, Freitas da Silva EV, Filho HG, Pellizzer EP, et al. Relationship Between Implant Stability
Measurements Obtained by Two Different Devices: A Systematic Review. J Periodontol. 2017;88(3):281–8.
Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Lang NP. Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone
characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(3):275–80.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 492 PDF Download: 667 |
||||
