Students’ Views of E-learning Usage in Higher Education: An Explanatory Sequential Study

1)    المراجع الاجنبية

Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in human behavior, 63, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2016). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27-50.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001

Al-Juda, M. Q. B. (2017). Distance Learning Students' Evaluation of E-Learning System in University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 324-335.https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p324

Al-Qahtani, A. A. Y., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students’ achievement in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00490.x

Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2018). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 2003–2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088

Alamri, M. M. (2019). Students’ academic achievement performance and satisfaction in a flipped classroom in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2019.096786

Aldiab, A., Chowdhury, H., Kootsookos, A., & Alam, F. (2017). Prospect of eLearning in Higher Education Sectors of Saudi Arabia: A Review. Energy Procedia, 110, 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.187

Aldiab, A., Chowdhury, H., Kootsookos, A., Alam, F., & Allhibi, H. (2019). Utilization of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education system: A case review for Saudi Arabia. Energy Procedia, 160, 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.186

Alebaikan, R., & Troudi, S. (2010). Blended learning in Saudi universities: Challenges and perspectives. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 18(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687761003657614

Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers and Education, 127, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.007

Alharbi, A. (2013). E-learning in the KSA : A taxonomy of learning methods in Saudi Arabia. Auckland University of Technology.

Alqahtani, S., & Issa, T. (2018). Barriers to the adoption of social networking sites in Saudi Arabia’s higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(10–11), 1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1464600

Alruwaili, T., & Ku, H. Y. (2019). The role of online communities and the impact of educational social media on Saudi female college students in the United States. Educational Media International, 56(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1614244

Alsabawy, A. Y., Cater-Steel, A., & Soar, J. (2016). Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.065

Alshahrani, N. S., Saudagar, A. K. J., & Alkhattabi, M. A. (2018). Current status and prospects for e-learning management in the promotion of distance education in Saudi Arabia. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291078.3291086

Alzahrani, M. G. (2017). Student Satisfaction with Using Online Discussion Forums at Saudi Universities. World Journal of Education, 7(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n2p1

Ashour, S. (2019). How technology has shaped university students’ perceptions and expectations around higher education: an exploratory study of the United Arab Emirates. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1617683

Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00126

Binyamin, S. S., Rutter, M. J., & Smith, S. (2019). Extending the technology acceptance model to understand students’ use of learning management systems in Saudi higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(3), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9732

Cheng, G., Guan, Y., & Chau, J. (2016). An empirical study towards understanding user acceptance of bring your own device (BYOD) in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2792.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Cubeles, A., & Riu, D. (2018). The effective integration of ICTs in universities: the role of knowledge and academic experience of professors. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(3), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1457978.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.

Eichelberger, A., & Leong, P. (2019). Using TPACK as a framework to study the influence of college faculty’s beliefs on online teaching. Educational Media International, 56(2), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1614246.

Elearning Deanship. (2020). Elearning Deanship | E-learning Rules. Retrieved April 27, 2020, from https://elearning.nu.edu.sa/en/112.

Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017). Teaching with technology in higher education: understanding conceptual change and development in practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300.

Farhan, W., Razmak, J., Demers, S., & Laflamme, S. (2019). E-learning systems versus instructional communication tools: Developing and testing a new e-learning user interface from the perspectives of teachers and students. Technology in Society, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101192.

Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in School and Out-of-School Contexts: A Multidimensional View of Engagement. Theory Into Practice, 50(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.607401.

Hakami, M. (2013). Teachers ’ and Students ’ Use of ICT in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (University of Bristol). Retrieved from https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.602347.

Hakami, M. (2014). Teaching Maths in secondary schools using the IWB: How teacher’s knowledge of the affordance of IWB influence teaching practice. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2014 (pp. 777–783). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/149015.

Hossain, S. F. A., Xi, Z., Nurunnabi, M., & Anwar, B. (2019). Sustainable academic performance in higher education: a mixed method approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1680392.

Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212.

Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Aristovnik, A., & Umek, L. (2019). Exploring critical factors of the perceived usefulness of blended learning for higher education students. PLoS ONE, 14(11), e0223767. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223767.

Kim, B., & Park, M. J. (2018). Effect of personal factors to use ICTs on e-learning adoption: comparison between learner and instructor in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 24(4), 706–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1312244.

Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers and Education, 51(2), 864–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005.

Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2006). Elearning : the key concepts. Routledge.

Matsushita, K. (2017). An invitation to deep active learning. In Deep Active Learning: Toward Greater Depth in University Education (pp. 15–33). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5660-4_2.

Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, London: SAGE Publications.

Mottus, A., Kinshuk, Chen, N. S., Graf, S., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). Teacher facilitation support in ubiquitous learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(5), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1544587.

Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., López Sánchez, J. Á., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students’ satisfaction. Computers and Education, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608

Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011

Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3

Rodrigues, H., Almeida, F., Figueiredo, V., & Lopes, S. L. (2019). Tracking e-learning through published papers: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 136, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.007.

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers and Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.

Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers and Education, 49(2), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004

Sharma, B., Nand, R., Naseem, M., & Reddy, E. V. (2019). Effectiveness of online presence in a blended higher learning environment in the Pacific. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1602756.

Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007.

Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A. B. T., & Arshah, R. B. A. (2019). E-learning Model for Students’ Satisfaction in Higher Education Universities: Review Paper. 2019 International Conference on Fourth Industrial Revolution, ICFIR 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFIR.2019.8894778.

Venkatesh, Thong, & Xu. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.

Waha, B., & Davis, K. (2014). University students’ perspective on blended learning. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(2), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.884677.