برنامج تدريبي قائم على قواعد البيانات اللغوية في إعداد المعلم: الکفاية النحوية في الکتابة. A Corpus-Based Training Program in Teacher Education: The Case of Grammatical Competence in Writing | ||||
| التربية (الأزهر): مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية) | ||||
| Article 13, Volume 39, 188ج4, October 2020, Page 572-605 PDF (1.02 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: بحوث فی مجال المناهج وطرق التدریس | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jsrep.2020.148104 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| أسامه محمود عبد الله عبد الله أبوالنور1; عبد الرحيم سعد الدين الهلالي2; عطية عبد القادر الطناني2 | ||||
| 1کلية التربية، جامعة الأزهر (القاهرة) | ||||
| 2أستاذ المناهج وطرق التدريس کلية التربية بالقاهرة جامعة الأزهر | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| استهدفت الدراسة الحالية الکشف عن أثر برنامج قائم على قواعد البيانات اللغوية في تنمية الکفاية النحوية لدى طلاب شعبة اللغة الإنجليزية بکلية التربية، جامعة الأزهر، ولقد اعتمدت الدراسة على المنهج شبه التجريبي (تصميم المجموعة الضابطة ذو الاختبارين القبلي والبعدي)، بلغ عدد طلاب عينة الدراسة 59 طالبًا تم اختيارهم بطريقة عشوائية، ولقد قام الباحث بتقسيم طلاب عينة الدراسة عشوائيًا إلى مجموعتين، إحداهما تجريبية قوامها 30 طالبًا، وأخرى ضابطة قوامها 29 طالبًا، کما تم الاعتماد على اختبار للکتابة ومقياس متدرج للتصحيح بعد التحقق من صدق الاختبار وثباته، قام الباحث بتصميم برنامج تدريبي قائم على قواعد البيانات اللغوية کمادة معالجة تجريبية لتحقيق هدف الدراسة، کشفت نتائج الدراسة أن البرنامج التدريبي القائم على قواعد البيانات اللغوية أدى إلى تحسن کبير في الکفاية اللغوية للطالب المعلم في الکفاية النحوية والتي انعکست في أدائهم الکتابي، وأوصت الدراسة بحتمية تدريب الطالب المعلم على کيفية استخدام وتوظيف قواعد البيانات اللغوية في الاستجابة لحاجات واهتمامات متعلم العصر الرقمي، ذلک الجيل الأکثر دراية ومهارة في التعامل مع معطيات العصر، وقد خُتمت الدراسة بعدد من التوصيات التي ترتبط باستخدام برامج التدريب القائم علي قواعد البيانات اللغوية، والکفاية النحوية ، ومهارات الکتابة في برامج إعداد المعلم والتنمية المهنية المستدامة. The current research sought to explore the effect of a corpus-based training program on developing grammatical competence as measured in the writing test among EFL majors at the Faculty of Education, Al-AzharUniversity. To meet this end, a quasi-experimental method (the pretest-posttest control-group design) was adopted. The research participants totaling 59 students were randomly assigned into two groups, namely an experimental group (30 students) and a control one (29 students). A writing test was developed with a scoring rubric after testing its validity and reliability and a corpus-based program was developed as a treatment material for fulfilling the research purpose. Results of the study revealed that the corpus-based training program led to significant improvement in EFL student teachers' grammatical competence manifested in their writing. The study highly recommended that teacher education programs need to train student teachers on how to use corpus-based or data-driven language teaching in reaction to the needs and interests of the digital and Gen z students who are more knowledgeable than their teachers themselves. The study concluded with a number of recommendations concerning the use of corpus-based program, EFL grammatical competence and writing skills in initial-teacher education programs and teachers’ continuous professional development programs. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| corpus; concordance lines; grammatical competence; phrases; clauses; tenses. قواعد البيانات اللغوية; خطوط التوافق; الکفاية النحوية; العبارات; أشباه الجمل; الأزمنة | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1) المراجع الاجنبية Abdul Aziz, S. (2001). Arab/ Yemeni students' predictable errors in writing English. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(8), 5-12.
Abdulrahman, S. A. (2006). Analysis of students' errors in the use of the English personal pronouns at the university level, (MA Thesis). Faculty of Post- graduate Studies, Omdurman Islamic University. Sudan.
Akyüz, S. (2018). The Effects of call in EFL: Using concordance lines on grammar teaching (Master's thesis, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
Al-Shammari, A. (2012). College students’ common errors in English grammar. Faculty of Education, Al-Azhar University Journal, 1(150), 775-801.
Baker, P., Hardie, A., & McEnery, T. (2006). A glossary of corpus linguistics.UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Benavides, C. (2015). Using a corpus in a 300‐level Spanish grammar course. Foreign Language Annals, 48(2), 218-235.
Boghossian, P. (2006). Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. USA: Clarendon Press.
Boulton, A. (2009). Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. ReCALL, 21, 37–51. doi:10.1017/S0958344009000068.
Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied linguistics, 1(2), 89
Brown, D. (2007). Teaching by principles. An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
Brownstein, B. (2001). Collaboration: The foundation of learning in the future. Education, 122(2).
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.
Campoy, M. C., Cubillo, M. C. C., Belles-Fortuno, B., & Gea-Valor, M. L. (Eds.). (2010). Corpus-based approaches to English language teaching. A&C Black.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.). Language and communication (pp. 2-27). New York: Longman.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Carnell, E. (2006). Understanding and enriching young people’s learning: issues, complexities and challenges. Improving Schools, 8(3), 269-284.
Chang, J. Y. (2014). The use of general and specialized corpora as reference sources for academic English writing: A case study. ReCALL, 26(2), 243-259.
Chen, P. (2013). Enhancing ELF learners’ lexical awareness through corpus-based reading-to-writing EBP instruction. The 58th Annual Conference of the International Linguistic Association.KingsboroughCommunity College at the City University of New York, New York, USA.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.
Close, R. A. (1981). English as a world language and as a mother tongue. World Englishes, 1(1), 5-8.
Cotos, E. (2014). Enhancing writing pedagogy with learner corpus data. ReCALL, 26(2), 202-224.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual review of applied linguistics, 21, 43-59.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd Ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Fikroni, M. R. (2018). Grammatical Competence within L2 Communication: Language Production, Monitor Hypothesis, and Focus on Forms Instruction. Pancaran Pendidikan, 7(1).
Flowerdew, L. (2011). Corpora and language education.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Flowerdew, L. (2012). Corpora in the classroom: An applied linguistic perspective. In K. Hyland, C. M. Huat, & M. Handford (Eds.), Corpus applications in applied linguistics (pp. 208–224). New York: Bloomsbury.
Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Constructivism revisited: Implications and reflections. The Constructivist, 16(1), 1-17.
Fullan, M. (2007). Change theory as a force for school improvement. In J. M. Burger, C. F. Webber, & P. Klinck, (Eds.). Intelligent leadership: Constructs for thinking education leaders. (pp. 27-39). Netherlands: Springer.
Gavioli, L. (2009). Corpus analysis and the achievement of learner autonomy in interaction. In L. Lombardo (Ed.), Using corpora to learn about language and discourse. (pp. 39–71). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2010). How can data-driven learning be used in language teaching? In A. O’Keefe & M. McCarthy (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 359–369). UK: Routledge.
Girgin, U. (2011). Corpus-based activities at lower levels of EFL proficiency: The effectiveness of using concordance lines on grammar learning (Doctoral dissertation, Bilkent University).
Huang, Z. (2014). The effects of paper-based DDL on the acquisition of lexico-grammatical patterns in L2 writing. ReCALL: the Journal of EUROCALL, 26(2), 163.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes, (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 53-73). UK: Penguin Books.
Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. ELR Journal, 4, 1–16.
Johns, T., Lee, H.-C., & Wang, L. (2008). Integrating corpus-based CALL programs in teaching English through children’s literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 483–506. doi:10.1080/09588220802448006.
Kennedy, G. (1998). An introduction to corpus linguistics.UK: Addison Wesley Longman.
Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 141(1), 124-128.
Lange R.T. (2011) Inter-rater Reliability. In: Kreutzer J.S., DeLuca J., Caplan B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1203
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied linguistics, 18(2), 141-165.
Lee, J., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Social network analysis of peer relationships and online interactions in a blended class using blogs. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 35-44.
Lin, M. H. (2015). Effects of corpus‐aided language learning in the EFL grammar classroom: A case study of students' learning attitudes and teachers' perceptions in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly. Doi: 10.1002/tesq.250.
Lindholm, J. (2009). Guidelines for developing and assessing student learning outcomes for undergraduate majors. USA: UCLA.
Lindquist, H. (2009). Corpus linguistics and the description of English. USA: Edinburgh University Press.
Mahdi, H. S. (2018). Effectiveness of mobile devices on vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 134-154.
Mart, C. T. (2018). The contentious debate over the language literature division. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 6(1), 117-127.
Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2019). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson.
Mohammed, A. M. (2003). The Interlingua errors of Arab students in the use of English binomials. Humanities and Documents Center Journal, 1(15), 7-22.
Morrow, K. (1977). Authentic Texts in ESP. In S. Holden (Ed.), English for specific purposes. London: Modern English Publications.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.
O'Keeffe, A., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). (2010). The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. USA: Routledge.
O'keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Osbourne, S. (2000). Public-private partnerships for public services: An international perspective. Routledge.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.
Phoocharoensil, S. (2012). L2 English compliment responses: An investigation of pragmatic transfer. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(6), 276-287.
Reppen, R. (2010). Using corpora in the language classroom. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Reppen, R. (2011). Using corpora in the language classroom. In B. Tomlinson (Eds), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 32-40). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Safina, M. S. (2014). Formation of Sociocultural competence in foreign language teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 80-83.
Savignon, S. J., & Wang, C. (2003). Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Learner attitudes and perceptions. IRAL, 41(3), 223-250.
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
Schunk, D. H, & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and Educational Applications. USA: Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schunk, D. H, & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
Sim, J. W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2010). The use of weblogs in higher education settings: A review of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 151-163.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The modern language journal, 82(3), 320-337.
Tomlinson, B. (2011). Materials development in language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Treadwell, J. W. (2010). The impact of discovery learning in writing instruction on fifth-grade student achievement. (PhD Dissertation). Walden University. USA.
Vannestål, M. E., & Lindquist, H. (2007). Learning English grammar with a corpus: Experimenting with concordance in a university grammar course. ReCALL: the Journal of EUROCALL, 19(3), 329.
Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford University Press.
Willis, J. (2011). Concordances in the classroom without a computer: Assembling and exploiting concordances of common words. In B. Tomlinson (Eds). Materials development in language teaching (pp. 40-56). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Yilmaz, M. (2017). The Effect of Data-driven Learning on EFL Students’ Acquisition of Lexico-grammatical Patterns in EFL Writing. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 75-88. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 205 PDF Download: 455 |
||||
