FRAMEWORK TO ASSIST IN SELECTING HUMAN CENTRED DESIGN TOOLS AND METHODS | ||||
| Journal of Arts & Architecture Research Studies | ||||
| Article 17, Volume 1, Issue 2, December 2020, Page 276-287 PDF (693.96 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Specialized scientific research papers | ||||
| DOI: 10.47436/jaarsfa.v1i2.72 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
Ammer Harb 
| ||||
| Design Department, Politecnico di Milano, Italy | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Human Centred Design is a significant approach in design. It increases the value of design as well as helping businesses to overcome the challenges of not meeting user needs. However, the abundance of Human Centred Design tools and the difficulty to discriminate between them have created the urge to develop selection framework for these tools in regard to the design process. In this paper, I present a framework to assist in selecting Human Centred Design tools. I highlight the significance of the Human Centred Design approach. I also explain the theoretical background behind creating the framework. Then I describe the participatory design workshop method I used to support and validate the results of the theoretical background in order to further develop the selection framework. This framework can be adopted in the design field in order to facilitate the process and to support practitioners’ decisions to select suitable tools. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Human Centred Design; Design process; Usability; Design Thinking | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Abras, C., Maloney-krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). Abras, Maloney-Krichmar, Preece - 2004 - User-Centered Design (1) in Bainbridge, W. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Thousand Oaks Sage Publications.pdf. 1–14.
Bevan, N. (2005). Cost benefits evidence and case studies. Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age. …, 1–30.
Bevan, N. (2009). Criteria for selecting methods in user-centred design. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 490(2003), 28–34.
Bevan, N., & Ferre, X. (2010). Usability Planner: Development of a Tool to Support the Selection and Estimation of Cost Benefits of UCD Methods. 3rd International Conference on Human-Centred Software Engineering, HCSE 2010, October.
Birkhofer, H., Jansch, J. & Kloberdanz, H. (2005). An extensive and detailed view of the application of design methods and methodology in industry. International Conference on Engineering Design ICED 05 Melbourne.
Hanington, B. M., Martin, B. (2012). Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers. Chicago
International Organisation for Standardisation [ISO]. (2010) Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems
Lockton, D. (2013). Design With Intent, A Design Pattern Toolkit for
Environmental & Social behaviour change. PHD. School of Engineering &
Design, Brunel University.
Kimbell, L. (2009). Beyond design thinking : Design-as-practice and designs-in-practice. CRESC Conference, May, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660910942454
Norman, D., Draper, S. (1986). User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA.
Rohrer, C. (2008). When to Use Which User Experience Research Methods.
Alertbox, retrieved from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/user-research-methods.
html on 5 June 2014
Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P, Walker, G, Baber, C., Jenkins, D. (2005). Human
Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. Ashgate, Farnham.
Tidball, B., Stappers, P. J., & Mulder, I. (2010). Models, Collections and Toolkits for Human Computer Interaction: What Can We Learn? Proceedings of the 2010 Bristish Computer Society Conference on Human Computer Interaction, BCS-HCI 2010, 1–9. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 210 PDF Download: 257 |
||||
