IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH PROVISIONALIZATION USING AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT PARTICULATES VS DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE BONE VS NANO-HYDROXYAPATITE AS A SPACE FILLING MATERIAL IN THE MAXILLARY ESTHETIC ZONE
Yousif omar, M., El Khadem, A., Abdel Rasoul, M. (2021). IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH PROVISIONALIZATION USING AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT PARTICULATES VS DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE BONE VS NANO-HYDROXYAPATITE AS A SPACE FILLING MATERIAL IN THE MAXILLARY ESTHETIC ZONE. EKB Journal Management System, 67(2), 1357-1369. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.55129.1423
Mohamed Yousif omar; Amr El Khadem; Mohammed Abdel Rasoul. "IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH PROVISIONALIZATION USING AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT PARTICULATES VS DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE BONE VS NANO-HYDROXYAPATITE AS A SPACE FILLING MATERIAL IN THE MAXILLARY ESTHETIC ZONE". EKB Journal Management System, 67, 2, 2021, 1357-1369. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.55129.1423
Yousif omar, M., El Khadem, A., Abdel Rasoul, M. (2021). 'IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH PROVISIONALIZATION USING AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT PARTICULATES VS DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE BONE VS NANO-HYDROXYAPATITE AS A SPACE FILLING MATERIAL IN THE MAXILLARY ESTHETIC ZONE', EKB Journal Management System, 67(2), pp. 1357-1369. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.55129.1423
Yousif omar, M., El Khadem, A., Abdel Rasoul, M. IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH PROVISIONALIZATION USING AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT PARTICULATES VS DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE BONE VS NANO-HYDROXYAPATITE AS A SPACE FILLING MATERIAL IN THE MAXILLARY ESTHETIC ZONE. EKB Journal Management System, 2021; 67(2): 1357-1369. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.55129.1423

IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH PROVISIONALIZATION USING AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT PARTICULATES VS DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE BONE VS NANO-HYDROXYAPATITE AS A SPACE FILLING MATERIAL IN THE MAXILLARY ESTHETIC ZONE

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 3, Volume 67, Issue 2 - Serial Number 4, April 2021, Page 1357-1369  XML PDF (1.97 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.55129.1423
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed Yousif omar email orcid 1; Amr El Khademorcid 2; Mohammed Abdel Rasoulorcid 3
1Implantology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
2Assistant Professor, Oral and Dental Removable Prosthodontics, Dentistry. Cairo University
3Lecturere, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dentistry. Cairo University
Abstract
Background: Latest dentistry had been reported as fast and growing evolution. Regarding the implant- rehabilitation protocols, they had been altered in order to fulfill patient’s increasing prospects in terms of ease, appealing and smaller treatment period. Aim; evaluate bone and soft tissue changes after tooth extraction and immediate implant insertion with immediate provisionalization in the anterior maxilla, Results: Mean horizontal bone loss for Group I, II and III were (0.671), (0.380) and (0.289) mm respectively. This was statistically not significant as p=0.057. Mean vertical bone loss for Group I, II and III were (0.212), (0.233) and (0.262) mm respectively. This was statistically not significant as p=0.807. Conclusion: Immediate implant with immediate temporization using graft materials to augment jumping gap is a successful treatment modality for rehabilitation of hopeless teeth in the esthetic zone. The type of graft materials doesn’t significantly affect on the outcome (horizontal and vertical bone loss) following implant installation with immediate temporization in the esthetic zone.
Keywords
Implant; Immediate; Graft; Esthetic; Maxilla
Statistics
Article View: 317
PDF Download: 321