Evaluation of implant’s primary stability using Densah bur versus expander in patients with missing maxillary premolar (A randomized clinical trial)
Mahmoud Riad, A., Fahmy, A., El Khourazaty, N. (2021). Evaluation of implant’s primary stability using Densah bur versus expander in patients with missing maxillary premolar (A randomized clinical trial). EKB Journal Management System, 67(2), 1487-1495. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.57472.1449
Ahmed Hisham Mahmoud Riad; Ahmed Fahmy; Nada El Khourazaty. "Evaluation of implant’s primary stability using Densah bur versus expander in patients with missing maxillary premolar (A randomized clinical trial)". EKB Journal Management System, 67, 2, 2021, 1487-1495. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.57472.1449
Mahmoud Riad, A., Fahmy, A., El Khourazaty, N. (2021). 'Evaluation of implant’s primary stability using Densah bur versus expander in patients with missing maxillary premolar (A randomized clinical trial)', EKB Journal Management System, 67(2), pp. 1487-1495. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.57472.1449
Mahmoud Riad, A., Fahmy, A., El Khourazaty, N. Evaluation of implant’s primary stability using Densah bur versus expander in patients with missing maxillary premolar (A randomized clinical trial). EKB Journal Management System, 2021; 67(2): 1487-1495. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.57472.1449

Evaluation of implant’s primary stability using Densah bur versus expander in patients with missing maxillary premolar (A randomized clinical trial)

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 15, Volume 67, Issue 2 - Serial Number 4, April 2021, Page 1487-1495  XML PDF (1.12 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.57472.1449
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed Hisham Mahmoud Riad email orcid 1; Ahmed Fahmy2; Nada El Khourazatyorcid 2
1Implantology department, Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
2Associate Professor of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate implant primary stability using Densah bur in comparison with expanders in maxillary premolar area. Material and methods: This study was conducted on twenty patients. The patients were divided into two equal groups. Each patient received one implant at the edentulous site of missing first or second maxillary premolar. One group received implants after using Densah bur, while the other group received implants after using screw expander. After implant placement, Smart peg was placed on implant and Ostell was used to record ISQ. Implant stability was measured intraoperative and at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 for both groups. The collected results were tabulated and statistically analyzed. Results: The study results showed there was no statistically significant difference between (Expander) and (Densah bur) groups in ISQ reading except at surgery and week two where the highest mean value was found in (Expander) group, while the least mean value was found in (Densah bur) group. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, Densah bur enabled successful implant insertion with acceptable primary stability in the resorbed maxillary premolar area. Moreover, the Densah bur can be used in a faster manner.
Keywords
Atrophic maxilla; Maxillary Premolar; Expansion; Densah bur; Implant stability
Statistics
Article View: 543
PDF Download: 677