Effect of Some Weed Control Treatments on Potato (Solanum tuberosum, L) Crop | ||||
| Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches | ||||
| Article 3, Volume 20, Issue 2, June 2015, Page 238-253 PDF (163.77 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Research papers | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jalexu.2015.161391 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Ali Sharshar  1; El-Hassanein Hassanein2; Omayma ElSaid Shaltout3; Mona Yousry3; Ahmad El-Gamal3
| ||||
| 1Agricultural Research Center, Weed Research Central Laboratory, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Agricultural Research Center, Weed Research Central Laboratory, Egypt | ||||
| 3Faculty of agriculture, Saba-Basha, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Two field experiments were carried out at the Experimental Farm, of Sakha Agriculture Research Station, Agriculture Research Centre, Kafr El-sheikh Governorate which is clay soil. These experiments were conducted to study the effect of some weeds control treatments on weeds and potato crop, during the above mentioned dates 2011/12 and 2012/13 winter seasons. Each experiment comprised twelve treatments which were, 1- Sencor 70 % WP (metribuzin 300 g/Fed.), which applied at 5% emergence of potato, 2- Gesagard 50 % SC (prometryn 1.25 L/Fed.), applied at 5% emergence of potato, 3- Stomp 50% EC (pendimethalin 1.7 L/Fed.), applied after planting (AP) and before irrigation, 4- Amex 48% EC (butralin 2.5 L/Fed.), applied post planting, 5-Fusilade forte 15 % EC (fluazifop-p-butyl 1.4 L/Fed.), applied at 30 days after planting (DAP), 6- Sencor followed by Fusilade forte (300 g /1.4 L/Fed.), 7-Gesagard followed by Fusilade forte (1.25/1.4 L/Fed.), 8- Stomp followed by Fusilade forte 1.7/1.4 L/Fed, 9- Amex followed by Fusilade forte 2.5/1.4 L/Fed., 10- hand hoeing twice at 45 and 60 DAP, 11- hand hoeing thrice at 45, 60 and 75 DAP, and 12- Untreated control. The results of this obtained showed that the best treatments for controlling weed in potato were hand hoeing twice, hand hoeing thrice and herbicidal combination of Sencor 300g/Fed. + Fusilade forte 1.4 L/Fed. for controlling annual grassy and broadleaved weeds were recorded as of 87.9, 95.6, 81.5% total weeds control in the 2011/12 and 2012/13 winter seasons. Moreover, these treatments increased the number of tuber, average weight of tuber, number of tuber/10 kg, plant height (cm), number of main stems, tuber grading index, tuber shape index, tuber dry matter, starch % and tuber specific gravity compared with untreated check during both seasons of the study. The research showed that the best treatments to control weeds associated with the potato plants to get the highest yield and quality of potato tubers are hoeing twice or thrice, and four sequenced treatments of Sencor, Stomp, Gesagard and Amex that followed by Fusilade forte for each. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| weed; control; potato; herbicides | ||||
| References | ||||
|
A.O. A. C. (1980).Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, bed., Washington, D.C.P.1018.
Arnold, R. N., Murray, M.W., Gregory, E.J., and Smeal, D. (1991).Weed Control in field potatoes. Agric. Experiment Station Research Report 723.College of Agric. and Home Economics.
Arora, A, Tomar, S. S., Gole, M. K. (2009).Yield and quality of potato as influenced by weed management practices and their residual study in soil. Agric. Sci. Digest, 29(2):39-41.
Channappagoudar, B. B., Biradar, N. R., Bharmagoudar, T. D., Koti, R. V. (2007). Crop weeds competition and chemical control of weeds in potato. Karnataka. of Agric. Sci., 20 (4):715-718.
Channappagoudar, B.B., Biradar, N. R., Bharamagoudar, T. D., Koti, R. V. (2008). Influence of herbicides on physiological and biophysical parameters in potato. Karnataka. of Agric. Sci., 21, 1:4-7.
Dinesh, K., R. Ezekiel, B. Sing and I. Ahmed (2005). Conversion table for specific gravity dry matter and starch content from under water weight of potatoes grown in North India plains. Potato J., 32 (1-2) : 79-84
Duncan, B. D. (1955). Multiple test range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 11-142.
El-Gamal, A. M. (1989). Increasing seed-sized tubers of cara potato by gibbrillic acid and some agricultural treatments. J. Agric. Sci., Mansoura Univ., 14(2): 699-706.
El-Mahy, S. A. (2005). Efficacy of some pre- and post-emergence herbicides in potato and tomato crops with reference to residues of fluazifop-butyl in tomato and bermudagrass plants. Bull. of Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ. 56, 1:173-188.
Frito Lay Company (1999). Potato sending Manual. Operations quality system department. Leicester, United Kingdom
Gitsopoulos, T. K., Damalas, C. A., Georgoulas, I. (2014). Herbicide mixtures for control of water smartweed (Polygonum amphibium) and wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus) in potato. Weed Techn. 28, 2:401-407.
Haase, N.U. (2003). Estimation of dry matter and starch concentration in potatoes by determination of underwater weight and near infra red spectroscopy. Journal of potato research, Netherland, 46(3-4):117-127
Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall Private, Ltd., New York
Jovovic, Z., Momirovic, N., Alovic, I., Stesevic, D. (2005). The effect of weed control mode on some more significant production traits of potato. Herbologia, 6: 1:75-84.
Kheraba, A. H., Shaban, S. A., Abdulla, A. M. (1991).Weed control studies on potato. II - Yield and quality. Egyptian Journal of Agrono.17-32.
Kumar, C. C., Shrivastava, G. K., Kumar, C. A., Dewangan, C. (2013). Effect of water management, weed and integrated nutrient management on yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum).Trends in Biosciences, 6:5:544-546.
Mircov, V. D., Alovic, I., Brocic, Z. (2006). Results of weed control in field potatoes. Herbologia, 7(1):3-7.
Mukhopadhyay, S. K., Dhiman R., Chettri, M. (2002). Evaluation of Prometryn 50 WP as a herbicide in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Orissa Journal of Horticulture, 30:1:64-67.
Mukherjee, P. K., Rahaman, S., Maity, S. K., Sinha, B. (2012). Weed management practices in potato [Solanum tuberosum L.]. Journal of Crop and Weed,. 8:1:178-180.
Panghal, V. S., Nehra, B. K., Khurana, S. C., Singh, N. (2003). Effect of different herbicides and time of application on tuber yield and weed control efficiency in potato. of the Indian Potato Association, 30: 1/2:107-108.
Rana, M. C., Rana, S. S., Man Singh (2004). Influence of weed control and fertility levels on the productivity of seed potato under Lahaul valley conditions of Himachal Pradesh.Indian Journal of Weed Science, 37: 3/4:228-230.
Rashmi Yadav and Kumar, V. A. (2011). Bio-efficacy of herbicides against complex weed flora in potato (Solanum tuberosum) crop grown through mini plants. Indian Journal of Agric. Sci. 81: 4:386-388.
Salna, A. and Tyla, G.(1996). Studies on the effectiveness of Fusilade Super, Nabu, Targa, Zellek on couch-grass killing in potato stands. Lietuvos Zemdirbystes Instituto Mokslo Darbai, Zemdirbyste,. (54):83-96.
Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1980). Statistical Methods. 6th Ed., Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, USA.
Thomas K. G., Christos A. D. and I. Georgoulas. (2014). Herbicide mixtures for control of water smartweed (Polygonum amphibium) and wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus) in Potato. Weed Techn., 28(2):401-407.
Vincent, L. (2009). Tropical root and tuber [crops: cassava sweet potato, Yams and Aroids Publisher ISBN 978-1-84593-424-8.
Wettstein, D. (1957). Chlorophyll lethal under submikro-skopiche formwechsel der plastiden. Expt. Cell Res., 12:427-433.
Winigar, F.A. and ludwing J.W. (1974). Methoden der Qualitatsbeurteilung bei Kartoffeln Furden menschlichen konsum. J. Potato Research, 17:4 434-465
Zarzecka, K. (1998). Assessment of different weed control systems on potato plantations: Part II. Effect of weed control systems on the height and quality of potato yield. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych. Seria A, Produkcja Roslinna, 113, (1/2):179-186. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 99 PDF Download: 233 |
||||
