Impact of Planting Methods and Plant Density on Intercropped Wheat with Sugar Beet | ||||
| Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches | ||||
| Article 9, Volume 24, Issue 2 - Serial Number 92, June 2019, Page 212-225 PDF (1.14 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Research papers | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jalexu.2019.163359 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Mahmoud Abdelaziz Gomaa1; Essam Esmail Kandil1; Atef Abdelgeleel Zen El-Dein2; Awad Kamal Abu Eisha2 | ||||
| 1Plant Production Dep., Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Agricultural Research Center, Etay El-Baroud Research Station El-Beheira, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Two field experiments were carried out at Etay El-Baroud Research Station, El-Beheira Governorate, Agric. Res Center in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons to evaluate three planting methods and four intercropping densities of wheat with sugar beet and their interaction. The obtained results indicated that planting sugar beet on wide ridges (120 cm width) and wheat on the wide of the same ridges (M1) significantly increased yield and its components. The intercropping densities of wheat had significant effect on most of studied traits for this crop. Decrease densities of wheat lead to the highest values of all sugar beet characters and spike length of wheat, while No. of spikes/m2, grain weight/m2 of wheat were increased by increasing intercropping densities of wheat. A monoculture crop gave the highest values of both crops. Significant interaction effect between planting methods and intercropping plant density was found on some studied characters of the two crops under testing. Planting method intercropping combination on wide sugar beet ridges 120 cm width (M1) resulted in the greatest land eqvillant ratio (LER) and gross returns. The results showed that the productivity of land increased by intercropping 12.50 % of wheat seeding rate per feddan with sugar beet gave the highest LER and gross returns. The best productivity of land was achieved by planting wheat with sugar beet on sugar beet ridges 120 cm width (M1) by using intercropping density 12.50 %. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Intercropping; Sugar beet; Wheat; planting; density; intercroping | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Abd El-Zaher, S.R. and E.K. Gendy (2014). Effect of plant density and mineral and bio-nitrogen fertilization on intercropping faba bean with sugar beet. Egypt, J. Appl. Sci., 29(7):352-366.
Ahlawat, I. P., S. Omprakash and G. S. Saini (2002). Scientific Crop Production in India. Aman Publishing House, Meerut. pp- 576.
CoStat, Ver. 6.4 (2005). Cohort software798 light house Ave. PMB320, Monterey, CA93940, and USA. Email: info@cohort.com and Website: http://www.cohort.com/DownloadCoStatPart2.html
Egbe, O. M. (2010). Effect of Plant density of intercropped soybean with tall sorghum on competitive ability of soybean and economic yield at Otobi, Benue State, Nigeria. J. Cereals and Oil seeds,1(1): 1-10.
FAO (2017). Food and Agriculture Organization database for 2017 season.
Farghaly, B. S, A. A. Zohry and S. A. A. Bassal (2003). Crops management for intercropping sugar beet with some essential crops to maximize area unit productivity. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 28(7):5183- 5199.
Gao, Y., Wu, P.T., X.N. Zhao and Z.K. Wang (2014). Growth, yield and nitrogen use in the wheat/maize intercropping system in an arid region in north western China. Field Crop Res., 167:19-30.
Hamdany, M. K.H. and M. R. El-Aassar (2017). Effect of intercropping three faba bean varieties with sugar beet plants on piercing sucking insect pests and associated natural enemies under ridge space and seedling rates in relation crop yield. Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci. (A. Entomology),10(6):57- 77.
Hassan, G., A. Faiz, B. Marwat and K.B. Nwfp (2005). Effects of planting methods and tank mixed herbicides on controlling grassy and broadleaf weeds and their effect on wheat. Agric. Univ., Peshawar (Pakistan). Dept. Weed Sci A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Institute,Tarnab Peshawar, Pakistan during Rabi 2001-2002.
Kumar, B., U.S.Tiwana, A.Singh and H. Ram (2014). Productivity and quality of intercropped maize (Zea mays L.) + cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Walp. fodder as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus levels. Range Management and Agroforestry, 35: 263-267.
Le-Docte, A. (1927).Commercial determined of sugar beet root using such Le-Docte process lnt. Sug. J. 29: 488-492. (C.F. Sugar beet Nutrition 1927 App. Sci., pub London, A.P. Drycott).
Saban, Y., A. Mehmet and E. Mustafa (2008). Identification of advantages of maize-legume intercropping over solitary cropping through competition indices in the East Mediterranean Region. Turk., J. Agric.,32:111-119.
Salama, H.S. A., D. El-S. El-Karamity and A. I. Nawar (2016). Additive intercropping of wheat, barley, and faba bean with sugar beet: impact on yield, quality and land use efficiency. Egypt. J. Agron., 38(3):413-430.
Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran (1967). Statistical Methods 7th edition, Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Towa, USA.
Willey, R.W. and D.S. Soiree (1972). Studies on mixture of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reverse to plant population. J. Agric. Sc. Cambridge, 79: 519-529.
Zahoor, A., S. Paigham, M.K. Khair and Y. Sadahiro (2010). Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) response to different planting methods and row geometries II: Effect on plant growth and quality. J. Food Agric. and Envi., 8 (2): 785-791. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 124 PDF Download: 232 |
||||
