Evaluation of Some Clones Derived from Two Sweet Potato Cultivars Under Water Deficit Conditions | ||||
| Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches | ||||
| Article 11, Volume 24, Issue 3 - Serial Number 91, September 2019, Page 382-409 PDF (1.33 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Research papers | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jalexu.2019.163469 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Mohamed Gharib1; Aly Abido1; Gamal Abdelnasser2; Sameh Moussa3; Mona Mohamed Yousry1 | ||||
| 1Plant Production Dept., Faculty of Agric., Saba Basha, Alexandria Univ. | ||||
| 2Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Dept., Faculty of Agric., Saba Basha, Alexandria Univ. | ||||
| 3Potato and Vegetative Reproduction Res. Dept., Horticulture Res. Inst., ARC. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas, L.) is one of the root crops worldwide especially developing countries as a popular staph food, but due to its highly heterozygosity as cross-pollinated crop wherein many of its traits exhibit constant variation. Also, sweet potato is sensitive to water deficits especially during its formation stage including vine development and storage root induction. Therefore, this study was undertaken in corporation between El-Sabaheya Horticultural Research Station and the Experimental and Research Farm of The Faculty of Agriculture (Saba-Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria governorate, Egypt, to develop distinct sweet clones. Stem cuttings of both Abees and Mabrouka cultivars were exposed to gamma ray radiation or immersed in colchicine or sodium azide solutions. 8 promising clones were selected to be evaluated under water deficit conditions in two field trials in comparison with their mother plants during the summer seasons of 2017 and 2018. Four irrigation levels (100, 75, 50 and 25% of ET0) were applied. The gained results revealed that the best results for the vegetative growth characters were achieved with the treatment of 100 % of evapotranspiration, except for number of main branches / plant which possessed the highest mean values with the treatment 25 % of evapotranspiration. Tuber root yield character and its component traits were significantly affected by both studied variables (sweet potato genotypes and irrigation levels). As for the main effect of irrigation levels on tuber root yield/feddan and its component characters, there are significant and direct proportional relationship between the independent variable (irrigation levels) and dependent one (studied traits).The highest average values for tuber root yield/feddan were scored at 100 % of irrigation level during the two seasons, followed with the treatment 75 % of irrigation level; while 25 % of irrigation treatment possessed the lowest mean values. The highest average values were recorded for marketable tuber root yield (%) were recorded at 100 % of irrigation level; while the lowest mean values were scored at 25 % of irrigation treatment. Carotene content and percentages of total sugar and starch were not significantly affected by different levels of irrigation from 100% down to 50% except for starch percentage during the second season. The obtained results, clearly demonstrated that there are large and mainly positive direct effects of both average tuber root weight (g) and number of tuber roots/plant on sweet potato yield (ton/fed.). In briefly, It is recommended to select clone A1 (It was developed as a mutation resulting from the exposure of Abees cv. to gamma ray) because it is characterized by a high productivity (ton / fed.) at 100% irrigation level or when there is a shortage of water supply (75% of evapotranspiration) compared with other tested sweet potato genotypes. Also, clone M1 (It was developed as a mutation resulting from immerging of Mabrouka cv. in colchicine solution) could be selected because of its high productivity, suitable for starch extraction, both when irrigation water is available or even when there is a shortage of irrigation water up to 75% of evapotranspiration. Clone M2 (It was developed as a mutation resulting from immerging of Mabrouka cv. in colchicine solution) could be the best choice where severe water shortage conditions (50% and 25% of evapotranspiration) are found. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| sweet potato; Ipomoea batatas; L; mutations; water stress; correlation coefficients and path analysis | ||||
| References | ||||
|
AOAC (1985). Official Methods of Analysis pp 490-510. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Washington, D.C.
Abou El-Khair, E.E., D.A.S. Nawar and H.M.E. Ismail (2011).Effect of irrigation water quantity and farmyard manure on potato plant grown in sandy soil. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 89 (1): 317-334.
Anjum, S.A., X. Xie, L. Wang, M.F. Saleem, C. Man and W. Lei (2011). Review: Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afri. J. Agric. Res., 6(9): 2026-2032.
Ballmer, T., T. Hebeisen, R. Wüthrich and F. Gut (2012). Potential for drip irrigation in potato production under changing climatic conditions. Forschungsanstalt Agroscope Reckenholz-Taenikon ART, Zuerich., 3(5): 244-251.
Bennett, J. (2003). Opportunities for increasing water productivity of CGIAR crops through plant breeding and molecular biology. In: J. W. Kijne, R. Barker and D. Molden, editors, Water productivity in Agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement. CAB International. p. 103-127.
Beukema, H.P. and D.E. van der Zagg (1990).Introduction to potato production.University of Wageningen press, Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, Pudoc. – III, 208.
Blum, A., L. Shipiler, G. Golan and J. Mayer (2009). Yield stability and canopy temperature of wheat genotypes under drought stress. Field Crops Res., 22(4): 289-296.
Charles, W.B., D.G. Hoskin and P.J. Cave (1973). Overcoming self and cross incompatibilities in Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam and Ipomoea trichoara Elliot. In: 3rd International Symposium on Tropical Root Crops, Ibadan, Nigeria. IITA. p. 17.
Davies, H.V., R.A. Jefferies and L. Scobie (1989). Hexose accumulation in cold stored tubers of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.): The effect of water stress. J. Plant Phys., 134: 248-254.
Dewey, D.R. and N.H. Lu (1959). A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agron. J. Sci. 515-518.
Dospekhove, B.A. (1984). Field experimental statistical procedures. Mir Publishers pp 349.
Engida, T.E.V., D. Sastry and D. Nigussie (2006).Correlation and Path Analysis in Sweet Potato and Their Implications for Clonal Selection. J. Agron., 5(3): 391-395.
Falkenmark, M. (2013). Growing water scarcity in agriculture: future challenge to global water security. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 371:201-204.
FAOSTAT (2006).FAO database. (http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx). (http:/www.ars-grin.gov/)
FAOSTAT (2014). FAO database. (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC)
Flexas, J., J. Bota, F. Loreto, G. Coranic and T.D. Shakey (2004).Diffusive and metabolic limitation to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. J. Pl. Biol., 6: 269-279.
Fongod, A.G.N., A.M. Mih and T.N. Nkwatoh (2012). Morphological and agronomical characterization of different accessions of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) in Camiron. International Research J. of Agric. Sci. and Soil Sci., (2): 234-245.
Gedamu, Y., G. Belay and N. Dechassa (2010).Genotypic and phenotypic correlations of root yield andother traits of orange fleshed sweet potatoes [Ipomoea batatas(L.) Lam.]. J. Dry lands., 3(2): 208-213.
Ghosh, S.G., K. Asanuma, A. Kusutani and M. Toyota (2000).Effect of moisture stress at different growth stages on the amount of total nonstructural carbohydrate, nitrate reductase activity and yield of potato. Japanese J. Trop. Agric., 44(3): 158-166.
Haverkort, A.J., M. Van de Waart and K.B.A. Bodiaender (1990).The effect of early drought stress on numbers of tubers and stolons of potato in controlled and field conditions. Potato Res., 33: 89-96.
Hironori, M., F. Ogasawara, K. Sato, H. Higo and Y. Minobe (2007).Isolation of a regulatory gene of anthocyanin biosynthesis in tuberous roots of purple-fleshed sweet potato.Plant Physiology143: 1252-1268.
Kamile, U. and G.N. Ayse (2015). Developments of Gamma Ray Application on Mutation Breeding Studies in Recent Years. International Conference on Advances in Agricultural, Biological & Environmental Sciences (AABES-2015) July 22-23, 2015 London (UK).
Kohyama, K. and K. Nishinari (1991).Effect of soluble sugars on gelatinization and retrogradation of sweet potato starch. J. Agric. Food Chem., 39: 1406-1410.
Kumar, R., S. S. Solankey and M. Singh (2012). Breeding for drought tolerance in vegetables. Vegetable Sci., 39 (1): 1-15.
Levy, D. (1983).Varietal differences in the response of potatoes to repeated short periods of water stress in hot climates. II. Tuber yield and dry matter accumulation and other tuber properties. Potato Res., 26: 315-321.
Li, C.C. (1975). Path-analysis primer. Boxwood Press Pacific Grove Calif (C.F. Ragheb, 1995).
Loebenstein, G., S. Fuentes, J. Cohen and L.F. Salazar (2003). Sweet potato: Virus and Virus-Like Diseases of Major Crops in Developing Countries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 223–248.
Lynch, D.R. and G.C.C. Tai (1979). Yield and yield components response of eight potato genotypes to water stress. Crop Sci., 29 (5): 1207-1211.
MacKerron, D.K.L. and R.A. Jefferies (1986). The influence of early soil moisture stress on tuber numbers in potato. Potato Res., 29: 299-312.
Malik, C.P. and M.P. Singh (1980). Plant enzymology and histoenzymology. A text manual, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
Mansour, M. K. M. (2018). Production of new distinct clones of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas, L.) using mutagenic substances and gamma-ray radiation. M.Sc. thesis, Fac. Agric. (Saba Basha), Alexandria Univ. Egypt. Pp. 62.
Mekonnen, B., S. Tulu and J. Nego (2015). Evaluation of Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas L.)Varieties for Yield and Yield Contributing Parameters in the Humid Tropics of Southwestern Ethiopia.J. Pl. Sci., (10)5: 191-199.
Mohanty, P., P. Ashok, K. Sasikala and D.V. Swami (2016).Character Association and Path Analyses in Sweet Potato. International J. of Vegetable Sci.Vol.22:514-554.
Moussa, S.A.M. and S.E. Gomaa (2017). Mutation breeding and assessment of clones induced through gamma radiation of the sweet potato cultivar (Abees). Egypt. J. Plant Breed. 21(2):312 – 338.
Neumann, P. M. (2008). Coping mechanisms for crop plants in drought-prone environments. Ann. Bot., 101: 901–907.
Ozias, A. P. and R.L. Jarret (2013). Nuclear DNA content and ploidy levels in the genus Ipomoea. JASHS 119(1): 110-115.
Paryy, M.A.J., P.J. Madgwick, J.F.C. Carvalho and P.J. Andralogic (2007). Prospects for increasing photosynthesis by overcoming the limitations of Rubisco. J. Agric. Sci., 45: 31-43.
Patil, V.D., V.G. Makane and P.R. Chopde (1981).Genetic variability and character association in intervarietal crosses of linseed. Ind. J. Agric. Sci.,51: 631-633.
Perey, A. C. (2015).Evaluation of selected sweet potato genotypes for drought resistance under greenhouse condition. Int. J. Curr. Res. Biosci. Plant Biol., 2(9): 104-114.
Rockström, J. (2003). Resilience building and water demand management for drought mitigation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 28(20): 869–877.
Shao, H., S. Jiang, F.Li, L. Chu, C. Zhao, M. Shao and X. Zhao (2007). Some advances in plant stress physiology and their implications in system biology era. Biointerafaces, 54: 33-36.
Shin, J.M., K. Bong-Kyu, S. Sang-Gyu, B.J. Seo, K. Ji-Seong, K. Byung, K. Si-Yong, L.S. Joon, C. Mi-Nam and K. Sun-Hyung (2011). Mutation breeding of sweet potato by gamma-ray radiation. Afri. J. Agric. Res., 6 (6): 1447-1454.
Simion,T. (2018). Breeding Sweet potato [Ipomoeae batatas (L.)Lam] For Low Moisture Stress Tolerance. Ann. Rev. & Res., 3(1):1-6.
Snedecor, G. H. and W. C. Cochran (1980). Statistical Methods. 7th ed. Iowa State University press, Ames., Iowa, U.S.A.
Sokoto, M. B. and K. A. Sadiq (2016). Science domain internationalproductivity of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas, L.) as influenced by water stress and variety in sokoto sudan savannah, Nigeria. Int. J. Plant & Soil Sci., 12(1): 1-9.
Sorrells, M.E., A. Diab and M. Nachit (2000).Comparative genetics of drought tolerance.In : Royo C. (ed.), Nachit M. (ed.), Di Fonzo N. (ed.), Araus J.L. (ed.). Durum wheat improvement in the Mediterranean region: New Challenges, Zaragoza (Spain): CIHEAM, 2000. p. 191-201.
Umiel, N. and W.H. Gabelman (1971). Analytical procedures for detecting carotenoids of carrot (Daucus carota L.) roots and tomato (Lycopersicone sculentum) fruits. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 96: 702-704.
Van Heeden, P. D. R. and R. Laurie (2008). Effects of prolonged restriction in water supply on photosynthesis shoot development and storage root yield in sweet potato. Physiol. Plant, 134: 99-109.
Vimala, B. (1989).Fertility and incompatibility in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Ann. Agr. Res. 10: 109-114.
Vimala, B. and B. Hariprakash (2011).Variability of morphological characters and dry matter content in the hybrid progenies of sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.]. Gene Conserve Vol. 10: 65-86.
Wang, H. (1964).A study on the self and cross incompatibilities in the sweet potato in Taiwan. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 84: 424-430.
Williams, W.A, M.B. Jones and M.W. Demment (1990). A concise table for path analysis statics. Agron. J. 82:1022-1024.
Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. J. of Agric. Res. 20: 202-209.
Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficient. Ann. Stat. 5: 161-215.
Yooyongwech, S., T. Samphumphuang, R. Tisarum, C. Theerawitaya and S. Chaum (2016). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) improved water deficit tolerance in two different sweet potato genotypes involves osmotic adjustment via soluble sugar and free proline. Sci. Hort., 198, 107–117. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 90 PDF Download: 278 |
||||
