Field Study on the Two Mite Species; Hemisarcoptes coccophagzs Meyer (Astigmata: Hemisarcoptidae) and Phyllotetranychus aegyptiacus Sayed (Prostigmata: Tenuipalpidae) on Two Varieties of Date Palm Trees at Giza Governorate | ||||
Acarines: Journal of the Egyptian Society of Acarology | ||||
Article 7, Volume 7, Issue 2, December 2013, Page 29-35 PDF (6.39 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original research articles | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/ajesa.2013.163695 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Sawsan G. Radwan; Angel R. Attia | ||||
Plant Protection Research. Institute , ARC., Giza, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Field study was carried out on the predaceous mite, Hemisarcoptes coccophagus Meyer and the phytophagous mite, Phyllotetranychus aegyptiacus Sayed associated with the diaspidid, Fiorinia phoenicis Balachowsky infesting two varieties (Semany and Zaghtol) of date palm trees at Giza governorate during the period from mid April 2012 to mid May 20l3.Population of F. phoenicls was noted all over the year being low from 1st November. Its population was recorded on Semany arrd Zaglol variety averaging 67.0 and 76.3 individuals/sq. inch showing highly significant difference as Zaghlol was favor for the prey. Population of nymphs and adults of H. coccophagus, was noted in large numbers from mid April to 1st August. Its means all over the period of study was 10.3 and 11 .8 individuals/sq. inch on Semany arrd Zaghlol with significant difference between records of the two varieties showing Zaghlol to be favor for the predaceous mite associated with its prey, F. phoenicis. The highest population of nymhs and adults of P. aegyptiacus was recorded in mid December; no individuals were recorded during the period from July to mid November. Means of P. aegtptiacus nymphs and adults on Semany ard Zaghlol werc 2.7 and 5.1 individuals/ sq. inch showing Zaghlol to be favored for the phytophagus mite. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Hemisarcoptes coccophagus; Phyllotetranychus aegyptiacus; Fiorinia phoenicis; date palm | ||||
Statistics Article View: 80 PDF Download: 109 |
||||