Evaluation of Alexandria Zoological Garden | ||||
| Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches | ||||
| Article 6, Volume 22, Issue 1 - Serial Number 82, March 2017, Page 90-109 PDF (1.78 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Research papers | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Mohamed Gamal EL-Tork1; Aly Ibrahim Aly Hassan Abido2; Safaa Said Essa Ali* 3 | ||||
| 1Floriculture, Ornamental Horticulture and Landscape Gardening Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University ,Egypt. | ||||
| 2Plant Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture -Saba Basha, Alexandria. University. | ||||
| 3Plant Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture -Saba Basha, Alexandria. University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Alexandria Zoological Garden (Alex Zoo) began in 1907 as a small menagerie in 1916, Antoniadis Gardens was redesigned to be able to display some animals and birds. Alex Zoo has an area of about 26 acres located in Smouha district, Alexandria, Egypt. An evaluation was carried out to determine the situation of Alex Zoo to see whether it matches the international standards of zoological gardens and whether the zoo was meeting the goals, roles, and benefits of similar zoological gardens. Results from site observations as well as the statistically analyzed questionnaires indicated several facts: concerning the reason for visiting Alex Zoo, most of the studied sample said that they visit the zoo mainly for entertainment and recreation then for education. The majority of visitors were not satisfied either about the gardens of Alex Zoo, or about the general situation and components of the zoo. Most of the visitors were not satisfied about the zoo entrances and accessibility since there is no possibility for the visitors to enter the zoo area using their cars because all the zoo entrances are provided with stairs since Alex Zoo level is higher than the level of surrounding area. As for the walkways circulation, the old design of Alex Zoo allows a kind of easy movement of visitors between animal exhibits since the streets is used only for pedestrians. The majority of visitors were upset since there is no possibility for wheel chaired disabled visitors to move into the zoo through the different entrances to reach the first level of the zoo unless being carried over by other visitors. On the other hand, the majority of visitors were satisfied about the safe barriers of visitors which keep them away and safely from the primary barriers around the perimeter of enclosures. There are no wayfinding signs or maps indicating the location and direction to any animal exhibit. The cleaning level was another point of dissatisfaction since most of the visitors were greatly upset because the accumulation of dirts and garbage everywhere. The majority of visitors were also not satisfied about the area and facilities of the children playground. Most of the visitors were not satisfied about the garden maintenance, lawns, flowers and other ornamentals, number and variety of garden plants. On the other hand, they were almost satisfied about the number and distribution of shade trees in the zoo since they were planted over one hundred years. With respect to the animal's area of Alex Zoo, the majority of visitors expressed their great satisfaction about the success of Alex Zoo designer to create a considerable level of exhibit simulation. In the same level of success, the majority of visitors were greatly satisfied about using good, safe and illusive animal barriers. Most of the visitors were partly satisfied about the presence of animal labels to obtain reasonable information about animals and how they live in the wild. But above all, the majority of visitors were greatly dissatisfied due to the low number of animals in the zoo, the cleaning level of animals and exhibits, as well as the absence of tour guides in the zoo. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Zoological Gardens; Alexandria Zoo Evaluation; Landscape Gardening; visitors perception; illusion design | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Ashraf, N.V.K.(2000). The botanical side of a zoological park in Coimbatore , India Zoo's print Journal, 15 (1) : 191-196
Badr, S.S. (2014). Zoos as recreational places and its impact on the Egyptian society. Alexandria Zoo ( E1 Nozha ), Egypt as Case study Environmental Studies in Architecture and Urban Design, 1:1-11.
Bitgood, S.C. (1999). Zoo Exhibit Design : Impact of setting factors on visitors. Visitor Studies Today ,2 (2) : 1-5.
Booth, N.K. (1983). Basic Elements of Landscape Architectural Design. Waveland Press Inc. Long Grove, Illinois.
Brawley, E. (2007). Designing successful gardens and out door space for Individuals with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 21:265- 283.
Carstens , D.Y. (1998). Outdoor spaces in housing for the elderly. In: Cooper- Marcus, C. and Francis , C., eds. , people places : Design Guidelines for Urban Open Spaces . van Nostrand Reinhold , New York , pp. 209-251.
Carpenter, P.L, Walker, T.D. and Lanphear, F.O. (1975). Plants in the Landscape W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.
Catibog-Sinha , C . (2008). Zoo Tourism : Biodiversity Conservation Through Tourism.Journal of Ecotourism, 7 : 155 – 173.
Churchman, D. (1985). How and what recreational visitors learn at zoos The Annual Western Meeting of the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquarium Administration, Anchorage, Alaska (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No . ED 259 911).
CLRdesign (2004). Long- range Physical Development Plan. Woodland Park Zoo.
Coe , J.C. (1983). A Greensward for Gorillas. 1983 AAZPA Conference Proceedings, American Zoo and Aquarium Association, Wheeling , WV, 117- 121.
Cooper- Marcus, C. and Barnes, M. (1995). Gardens in Healthcare Facilities: Uses, Therapeutic Benefits, and Design Recommendations. The Center for Health. Design, Inc
Croke , V . (1997). The modern ark : The story of zoos , past , present and future. New York : Scribner.
Frost , W. (2010). Zoos and tourism : conservation, education, Entertainment? Bristol , U.K. :Channel View Publications.
Graetz , M. (1995). The Role of Architectural Design in Promoting The Social Objectives of Zoos. A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Architecture, National university of Singapore.
Hancocks, D . (1971). Animals and architecture. New York : Praeger Publishers.
Harrison, B. (1991). The future evolution of zoos. The conference of the International Union of Directors of Zoological Gardens, Singapore.
Hirschi, K.D. and Screven, C.G.(1988). Effects of questions on visitor reading behavior. ILVS: A Journal of visitor Behavior, 1 (1) : 50 – 61.
Hoage , R . and Deiss , W. ( 1996). New worlds , new animals : From menageries tozoological park in the nineteenth century. London : the Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jones, G.R. (1985). What is a Zoo? Manuscript of the university of Michigan , USA.
Kirchner, C.E., Gerber ,E.G., and Smith, B.C.(2008). Designed to deter: community barriers to physically Activity for people with visual or motor impairments. American Journal of preventive Medicine, 34: 349- 352.
Lessow, D. (1990). Visitor perceptions of natural habitat zoo exhibits. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana university, Bloomington, IN.
Minter, S. (1995). The Healing Garden: A natural haven for body, senses Spirit. Charles E. Tuttle Company , Inc.
Mosca, C. (1982). Design features of graphics. In : K. Sausman (ed.), Zoological Park and Aquarium Fundamentals (pp.169 –174) . Wheeling, West Virginia: American Association Of Zoological parks and Aquariums.
Olney,R.J.S. and Ellis, P. (1989). Zoo and Aquaria of the world. International Zoo Yearbook, 28, 557,1989.
Patrick, P.G. and Tunnicliffe , S.D. (2013). Zoo Talk .Springer Science Business Media Dordrecht.
Polakowski, K. (1987). Zoo design : The reality of wild illusions. Ann Arbor , Michigan : University of Michigan.
Polakowski, K. J. (1989). A Design Approach to Zoological Exhibits: The zoo as Theater Zoo Biology supplement, 1 : 127 – 139.
Rees, P. A . (2011). An introduction to zoo Biology and Management .Wiley – Blackwell, a John Wiley Sons , Ltd . , Publication.
Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran W. (1989).Statistical Methods,8thed.,Iowa State University Press.
Tranter, R.T., Slater , R., and Vaughan, N. (1991). Barriers to mobility: physically – disabled and frail elderly People in their local outdoor environment. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 14:303 - 312.
WAZA (2006). Understanding Animals and Protecting Them, About the world zoo and aquarium strategy.World Association of Zoos and Aquariums , WAZA, Bern , Switzerland.
York, S.L. (2009). Residential design and outdoor area accessibility. NeuroRehabilitatio ,25 : 201 – 208.
Young, J. (2001). Sherbrooke Community Center : A restorative garden. M.SC. thesis , University of Manitoba , Canada. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 115 PDF Download: 327 |
||||
