Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography & Fundus Fluorescein Angiography
Ahmed Khalil, H., Osman Abd-El Khalek, M., Abd Elsattar Elnoby, A. (2021). Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography & Fundus Fluorescein Angiography. EKB Journal Management System, 2(2), 156-169. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2021.174980
Hossam El-din Mohamed Ahmed Khalil; Mohamed Osman Abd-El Khalek; Ahmed Abd Elsattar Elnoby. "Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography & Fundus Fluorescein Angiography". EKB Journal Management System, 2, 2, 2021, 156-169. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2021.174980
Ahmed Khalil, H., Osman Abd-El Khalek, M., Abd Elsattar Elnoby, A. (2021). 'Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography & Fundus Fluorescein Angiography', EKB Journal Management System, 2(2), pp. 156-169. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2021.174980
Ahmed Khalil, H., Osman Abd-El Khalek, M., Abd Elsattar Elnoby, A. Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography & Fundus Fluorescein Angiography. EKB Journal Management System, 2021; 2(2): 156-169. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2021.174980

Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography & Fundus Fluorescein Angiography

Egyptian Journal of Medical Research
Article 13, Volume 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 1, June 2021, Page 156-169  XML PDF (391.49 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejmr.2021.174980
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Hossam El-din Mohamed Ahmed Khalil; Mohamed Osman Abd-El Khalek; Ahmed Abd Elsattar Elnoby
Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University
Abstract
Background: OCT-A is developing as a new non-invasive rapid technique which may replace FFA as a gold standard procedure for diagnosis of DMI.  Aim of the Work: Comparison between fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for imaging of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in diabetic retinopathy patients (DR) affected and not affected by diabetic macular ischemia, (DMI). Subjects and Methods: In this prospective study, 30 eyes for 30 patients and separated by macular status as 19 eyes with DMI and 11 eyes without DMI instructed to undergo OCT-A scan, FFA. Full ophthalmological examination was done and patients signed their informed consents. Results: Of the 30 patients, 13 females and 17 males with a mean age of 52.63 ± 11.9 years. 17 eyes with DMI and 13 eyes without DMI have underwent full ophthalmological examination, BCVA measurement, FFA and OCT-A. BCVA was higher among eyes without DMI (0.5 ±0.2) as compared with eyes with DMI (0.25 ±0.2). Mean time for FFA was 9.4 ± 3.2 m and for OCT-A was 1.5 ± 0.8 m. OCTA can save time than FFA by 85%. 57% was affected with artifacts with OCT-A while 7% has allergic reactions to flourescien dye. Subjects with DMI presented a mean area on FA and OCTA of 0.85 ± 0.2 mm2 and 0.79± 0.2 mm2, respectively (p < /em> = 0.001). Patients without DMI presented a mean area on FA and OCTA of 0.39 ± 0.1 mm2 and 0.36 ± 0.1 mm2, respectively (p < /em> = 0.01). The ICC for the FAZ measurements between the 2 observers on FA and OCTA was 0.98 and 0.99, respectively. Conclusion: OCTA represents a novel technique to diagnose DMI and it may become an alternative to FA for this purpose.
Keywords
DMI; OCT-A; FFA
References
  1. Arend O, Wolf S, Harris A, Reim M. The relationship of macular microcirculation to visual acuity in diabetic patients. Archives of ophthalmology. 1995; 113(5):610-4.
  2. Bresnick GH, De Venecia G, Myers FL, Harris JA, Davis MD. Retinal ischemia in diabetic retinopathy. Archives of ophthalmology. 1975; 93(12):1300-10.
  3. Conrath J, Giorgi R, Raccah D, Ridings B. Foveal avascular zone in diabetic retinopathy: quantitative vs qualitative assessment. Eye. 2005; 19(3):322-6.
  4. de Carlo TE, Adhi M, Moult E, Choi W, Baumal CR, Witkin AJ, Duker JS, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK. Select features of diabetic retinopathy on swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography compared with fluorescein angiography and normal eyes. JAMA ophthalmology. 2016; 134(6):644-50.
  5. Garcia JM, Lima TT, Louzada RN, Rassi AT, Isaac DL, Avila M. Diabetic macular ischemia diagnosis: comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography. Journal of ophthalmology. 2016; 2016.
  6. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XIV. Ten-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Archives of ophthalmology. 1994; 12(9):1217-28.
  7. Lee SN, Barteselli G, Chhablani J. Safety and efficacy of oral fluorescein angiography in detecting macular edema in comparison with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2013; 33(8):1574.
  8. Novais EA, Adhi M, Moult EM, Louzada RN, Cole ED, Husvogt L, Lee B, Dang S, Regatieri CV, Witkin AJ, Baumal CR. Choroidal neovascularization analyzed on ultrahigh-speed swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography compared to spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography. American journal of ophthalmology. 2016; 164:80-8.
  9. Sim DA, Keane PA, Zarranz-Ventura J, et al. Predictive factors for the progression of diabetic macular ischemia, American Journal of Othalmology 2013; 156(4):684-92.
  10. Spaide RF, Klancnik JM, Cooney MJ. Retinal Vascular Layers Imaged by Fluorescein Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015; 133(1):45-50.
Statistics
Article View: 202
PDF Download: 227