A PEDAGOGICAL CONTEXT TO INTEGRATE TREND FORECASTING TECHNIQUES INTO INNOVATIVE DESIGN EDUCATION | ||||
| Journal of Arts & Architecture Research Studies | ||||
| Volume 2, Issue 3, June 2021, Page 83-103 PDF (1.69 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Specialized scientific research papers | ||||
| DOI: 10.47436/jaars.2021.72366.1009 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
Noha Essam Khamis 
| ||||
| Product Design Department, Applied Sciences & Arts, German University in Cairo (GUC), Egypt. Postdoc Associate, Design Department, London South Bank University (LSBU), United Kingdom | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Despite the abundance of knowledge in trend forecasting evident within many disciplines, there is a dearth of information on the application of trend forecasting in design education in the context of determining the innovation in trends’ concepts and philosophy, theme, colour, materials and finish. This issue stems from the inadequacy of the traditional learning framework in design curriculums to keep up with the multi-layered structure of design professions’ demands that acquire expanded, cross-boundary knowledge and futurology skills. This study suggests a thematic approach that employs trend forecasting as an integral part of the design process, entwined with form, function, desirability, and other considerations that highlight the market development within the real life context. This paper aims to investigate the significance of trend forecasting incorporated in the design education development process, and to set a practical guidance to educators to create a culture of anticipatory progress in learning, teaching and assessment that is completely aligned with the strategic objectives. The study has adopted a case-study based methodology of presenting examples of senior students’ projects and assessing the learning outcomes to be applied as medium synthesizing for new ideas generation. The results demonstrate forecasting through different scales of studies to provide a learning experience that is based on research, application and interaction with the design industry. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Pedagogical Context; Trends Forecasting Techniques; Learning outcomes; Innovative Design | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Academy of Design (2013). “Crafting the Future”. 10th European Academy of Design Conference, April 17-19 2013 in Gothenburg.
Adams, R., S., Daly, Sh., Mann, L., & Dall'Alba, G., (2011). “Being a professional: Three lenses into design thinking, acting, and being. Design Studies” - DESIGN STUD. 32. 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.004.
Adamson, L. and others. (2010). “Quality Assurance and Learning Outcomes”, ENQA Workshop Report. ENQA, Helsinki.
Armstrong, J. & Green, K., (2017). “Forecasting Methods and Principles: Evidence-Based Checklists”. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science.
Cuhls K, Blind K, Grupp H. (2002). “Innovations for our Future”. Physica Publishers: Heidelberg.
De Gooijer, J. G. and Hyndman, R. J. (2006). “25 years of time series forecasting”. International journal of forecasting, 22(3):443–473.
Demirbilek, N. and Demirbilek, O. (2007) “Architectural Science and student-centered learning in towards solutions for a livable future; progress, practice, performance, people”. Official Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Architectural Science Association ANZAScA, 14-16 November 2007, 85-91.
Demirkan, H., & Demirbaş, O., (2010). “The effects of learning styles and gender on the academic performance of interior architecture students” Volume2,Issue2,2010,P. 1390-1394, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.205
Docebo, A. R., (2014). “E-Learning Market Trends & Forecast 2014-2016”. Docebo.
Hyndman, R.J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2018). “Forecasting: principles and practice”, 2nd edition, OTexts: Melbourne, Australia. OTexts.com/fpp2.
Kapp, K. M. (2012). “The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Case-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education”. New York: Pfieffer: An Imprint of John Wiley & Sons.
Kimbell, L., (2011). “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I”. Design and Culture. 3. 285-306. 10.2752/175470811X13071166525216.
Lokhoff, J. and Bas Wegewijs and others, (2010). “A Tuning Guide to Formulating Degree Programme Including Programme Competences and Programme Learning Outcomes”. NUFFIC/Tuning Association, Bilboa, Groningen and The Hague.
Lopez, C. L. (2001) “Assessment of Student Learning in Context: What We Know; What We Are Learning”. Paper presented at the Kansas Statewide Assessment Workshop, Hutchinson, Kans., Apr. 2001.
Malhotra, S., Das, L.K. & Chariar, V.M. (2014). “Design research methods for future mapping”. International Conferences on Educational Technologies and Sustainability, Technology and Education 2014. New Tapei City, Taiwan.
Sheil, B., (2008). “Proto architecture: analogue and digital hybrids”. Bob Sheil - John Wiley & Sons.
Streits, N., Kameas, A., & Mavrommati, I., (2007). “The Disappearing Computer: Interaction Design, System Infrastructures and Applications for Smart Environments”. Springer, Heidelberg, LNCS 4500, May 2007.
Vejlgaard, H., (2012). “Anatomy of a Trend”. US: McGraw-Hill Education.
Walonick, D. S., (1993). “An overview of forecasting methodology”. http://www.statpac.com/research-papers/forecasting.htm. P. 9.
Wang, T. (2010). “A new paradigm for design studio education”. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 173-183.
Zou, H., & Yang, Y. (2004). “Combining time series models for forecasting”. International Journal of Forecasting, 20, 69–84. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 323 PDF Download: 272 |
||||
