Evaluation of Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix as a grafting material around immediate dental implant in mandibular posterior teeth | ||||
| Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 24, Issue 3, July 2021, Page 297-305 PDF (1.3 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2020.38219.1088 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Ahmed Abed Mansour  1; Mohamed Abd Elsalam Khalil2; Mohammad Abel-Hamied Shuman3
| ||||
| 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dental Medicine,Boys,Cairo, Al-Azhar University. | ||||
| 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dental Medicine,Boys,Cairo, Al-Azhar University | ||||
| 3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dental Medicine,Assiut, Al-Azhar University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Abstract Objective: the present study was performed to evaluate Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM) as a grafting material around immediate dental implant in mandibular posterior teeth Material and Methods: eight patients were selected for immediate dental implant in mandibular posterior teeth and use MPM as a grafting material around the implant. After surgery each patient were evaluated clinically at the following interval immediate, one week, two weeks, and three months postoperatively for:: Presence of infection, Edema, Graft exposure and/or loss, Soft tissue dehiscence, Pain, Nerve injury and Implant stability, and radiographically immediate and three months postoperatively interval by CBCT for: Bone density around the dental implant and Horizontal bone loss around the dental implant. Results: All patients hadn’t any infection, nerve injury, Graft exposure and /or loss, soft tissue dehiscence and facial edema throughout the study till three months. Osstel at 3 months (81.0 ± 7.68) was higher than immediately (63.40±4.16). Bone density at 3 months (447.0± 28.64) was higher than immediately (243.0±17.18). Patients experienced mild to moderate pain after surgery, at the surgical sites which decrease gradually during four days postoperatively then disappeared completely at the 7th day. Conclusion: The use of MPM with immediate implant reduces postoperative infection, edema, pain, graft exposure and/or loss and soft tissue dehiscence. Use of MPM with immediate implant enhances the implant stability, improves bone density around it and decrease marginal bone loss around the immediate implant. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix; immediate implant; bone density; marginal bone loss; implant stability | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 234 PDF Download: 285 |
||||
