Effect of Different Final Irrigation Activation Methods on Root Canal Cleanliness | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Article 12, Volume 67, Issue 3 - Serial Number 4, July 2021, Page 2725-2734 PDF (299.04 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.68904.1559 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Randa Elsobky 1; Abeer Darrag2; Neveen Shaheen 3 | ||||
1B.D.S (2011) | ||||
2Professor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University | ||||
3Assistant Professor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Aim: to evaluate canal cleanliness after using manual dynamic activation, passive ultrasonic irrigation and photoactivated disinfection in comparison with conventional needle irrigation, using scanning electron microscopy Methods: Sixty single rooted human premolars with nearly straight single canal were collected, the crowns of all teeth were removed near the level of cementoenamel junction to obtain approximately 15 ±1 mm uniform root lengths. After instrumentaion with ProTaper Next files up to X4 (40/06), roots were randomly divided into 4 equal groups (n=15) according to the method of final irrigation activation. Group I: Conventional needle and syringe irrigation. Group II: Manual dynamic activation. Group III: passive ultrasonic irrigation. Group IV: photoactivated disinfection. Canal cleanliness was evaluated with SEM using different magnification (X350- X1000). Results: Group III had the best cleanliness of the root canal while Group I had the worst cleanliness, there were statistical significant differences between Group I versus Groups II and III and between Group III and Group IV (P ≤ 0.05). Regardless the irrigation activation method, the coronal level showed significantly less amount of smear layer and remaining debris than the apical level. Conclusions: None of the tested final irrigation activation methods resulted in completely clean canal wall. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Keywords: Canal cleanliness; manual dynamic activation; passive ultrasonic irrigation; photoactivated disinfection; scanning electron microscopy | ||||
Statistics Article View: 250 PDF Download: 389 |
||||