COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON PARTIAL AUXILIARY LIVER AUTO AND HOMOTRANSPLANTATION IN DOGS | ||||
| Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal | ||||
| Article 24, Volume 29.2, Issue 58, July 1993, Page 213-224 PDF (3.64 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Research article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/avmj.1993.185893 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| A.M.A. HOSSIEN; M.T. NASSEF; H.B. EL-BADAWI; M.A. ALI; A.S. SALEH; G.A.H. AHMAD; A.MI. EL-KHATEEB | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The present work was done on 25 clinically healthy mongral dogs, weighing between 10-25 kg. b.w. The dogs were divided into three groups. The first group was subjected to partial auxiliary autotransp < /strong>lantation. The immunological factors were behind this choice. The second group, homotransp < /strong>lantation with portocaval shunt. The third group was subjected to partial auxiliary homotransp < /strong>lantation and portocaval shunt. The postmortem and histopathological examination were studied. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 92 PDF Download: 83 |
||||
