THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE & COMMUTING PATTERNS: LITERATURE REVIEW
Abouelhamd, I. (2021). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE & COMMUTING PATTERNS: LITERATURE REVIEW. EKB Journal Management System, 49(No 5), 662-678. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2021.57245.1026
Islam Abouelhamd. "THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE & COMMUTING PATTERNS: LITERATURE REVIEW". EKB Journal Management System, 49, No 5, 2021, 662-678. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2021.57245.1026
Abouelhamd, I. (2021). 'THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE & COMMUTING PATTERNS: LITERATURE REVIEW', EKB Journal Management System, 49(No 5), pp. 662-678. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2021.57245.1026
Abouelhamd, I. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE & COMMUTING PATTERNS: LITERATURE REVIEW. EKB Journal Management System, 2021; 49(No 5): 662-678. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2021.57245.1026

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE & COMMUTING PATTERNS: LITERATURE REVIEW

JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences
Article 7, Volume 49, No 5, September and October 2021, Page 662-678  XML PDF (404.5 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2021.57245.1026
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Islam Abouelhamd email orcid
Architectural Engineering Department, Assiut University, 71515, Assiut, Egypt
Abstract
This article is a primary-theoretical research that investigates the effect of urban spatial structure on commuting patterns. The examined variables are the city size, centrality, concentrations of activities, urban densities, and land-uses distribution. The selection is based on the most commonly used variables in the literature. The objective is detecting the prior theoretical and empirical contributions from the old and recent studies to conclude the research gap for potential optimization. The prior research confirms that both city size and the distance from the Central Business District are positively led to longer commuting distance, time, and cost. On the contrary, most of the literature has substantiated that the decentralized and densified population, employment, and social services, as well as the mixed land-uses, would notably reduce the average commuting distance, the number of motorized trips, and total vehicles miles travelled. The effect of urban-density and land-uses mix remains unclear due to findings that conflict with the empirical results. In the high-densified and diversified districts, traffic congestions may result in longer commuting time, which offsets the decrease in the distance. Furthermore, there is a research gap detected on the effect of the spatial distribution of urban densities, concentrations, and land-uses on the commuting patterns in scale of a city. Finally, this article raises the motivation to empirically investigate these variables in further studies for the Egyptian case.
Keywords
Urban Spatial Structure; Commuting Patterns; Urban Centrality; Urban Densities; Vehicles miles travelled
References
[1]      Paramita, B. (2011) Shaping Urban Spatial Structure [Online], Conference: SGRA. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233726166_Shaping_Urban_Spatial_Structure.

[2]      Acheampong, R. A. (2020) ‘Spatial structure, intra-urban commuting patterns and travel mode choice: Analyses of relationships in the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana’, Cities, vol. 96, p. 102432.

[3]      Krehl, A. (2015) ‘Urban spatial structure: An interaction between employment and built-up volumes’, Regional Studies, Regional Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 290–308.

[4]      Angel, S. and Blei, A. M. (2016) ‘The spatial structure of American cities: The great majority of workplaces are no longer in CBDs, employment sub-centers, or live-work communities’, Cities, vol. 51, pp. 21–35.

[5]      Boarnet, M. G. and Wang, X. (2019) ‘Urban spatial structure and the potential for vehicle miles traveled reduction: The effects of accessibility to jobs within and beyond employment sub-centers’, The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 122, p. 775.

[6]      Muñiz, I. and Sánchez, V. (2018) ‘Urban Spatial Form and Structure and Greenhouse-gas Emissions from Commuting in the Metropolitan Zone of Mexico Valley’, Ecological Economics, vol. 147, pp. 353–364.

[7]      Nam, K., Kim, B. and Lim, U. (2016) ‘Quantitative Regional Economic and Environmental Analysis for Sustainability in Korea’, Quantitative Regional Economic and Environmental Analysis for Sustainability in Korea, pp. 171–189 [Online]. Available at DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0300-4_10.

[8]      Sohn, J. (2005) ‘Are commuting patterns a good indicator of urban spatial structure?’, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 306–317.

[9]      Lin, D., Allana, A. and Cui, J. (2015) ‘The impacts of urban spatial structure and socio-economic factors on patterns of commuting: a review’, International Journal of Urban Sciences, Pages 238-255 [Online]. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2015.1016092.

[10]  Hu, L., Sun, T. and Wang, L. (2018) ‘Evolving urban spatial structure and commuting patterns: A case study of Beijing, China’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 59, pp. 11–22.

[11]  Jun, M.-J. (2020) ‘The effects of polycentric evolution on commute times in a polycentric compact city: A case of the Seoul Metropolitan Area’, Cities, vol. 98, p. 102587.

[12]  Antipova, A. (2018) Urban environment, travel behavior, health, and resident satisfaction, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan.

[13]  Cervero, R. (1989) ‘Jobs-Housing Balancing and Regional Mobility’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 136–150.

[14]  Dong, T., Jiao, L., Xu, G., Yang, L. and Liu, J. (2019) ‘Towards sustainability: Analyzing changing urban form patterns in the United States, Europe, and China’, Science of The Total Environment, vol. 671, pp. 632–643.

[15]  Duarte, C. M. and Fernández, M. T. (2017) ‘The Influence of Urban Structure on Commuting: An Analysis for the Main Metropolitan Systems in Spain’, Procedia Engineering, vol. 198, pp. 52–68.

[16]  Engelfriet, L. and Koomen, E. (2018) ‘The impact of urban form on commuting in large Chinese cities’, Transportation, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1269–1295.

[17]  Fosgerau, M. and Kim, J. (2019) ‘Commuting and land use in a city with bottlenecks: Theory and evidence’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 77, pp. 182–204.

[18]  Liu, Y., Fang, F. and Jing, Y. (2020) ‘How urban land use influences commuting flows in Wuhan, Central China: A mobile phone signaling data perspective’, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 53, p. 101914.

[19]  Lu, Y., Sun, G., Sarkar, C., Gou, Z. and Xiao, Y. (2018) ‘Commuting Mode Choice in a High-Density City: Do Land-Use Density and Diversity Matter in Hong Kong?’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 920.

[20]  Marcińczak, S. and Bartosiewicz, B. (2018) ‘Commuting patterns and urban form: Evidence from Poland’, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 70, pp. 31–39.

[21]  Yao, Z. and Kim, C. (2017) ‘The Changes of Urban Structure and Commuting: An Application to Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the United States’, International Regional Science Review, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 3–30.

[22]  Zhang, Z. (2017) ‘A Study on Urban Spatial Structure in the Context of the Jobs-Housing Balance: A Case of Suzhou, China’, Smart Growth and Sustainable Development, GeoJournal Library 122, pp. 73–85.

[23]  Zhou, H. and Gao, H. (2020) ‘The impact of urban morphology on urban transportation mode: A case study of Tokyo’, Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 197–205.

[24]  Sun, B., Zhang, T., He, Z. and Wang, R. (2016) ‘URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE AND MOTORIZATION IN CHINA’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 470–486.

[25]  Krehl, A., Siedentop, S., Taubenböck, H. and Wurm, M. (2016) ‘A Comprehensive View on Urban Spatial Structure: Urban Density Patterns of German City Regions’, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 76.

[26]  Bertaud, A. (2004) The Spatial Organization of Cities: Deliberate Outcome or Unforeseen Consequence?: Working Paper [Online], 01th edn, University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley, CA.

[27]  Chatman, D. G. (2003) ‘How Density and Mixed Uses at the Workplace Affect Personal Commercial Travel and Commute Mode Choice’, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1831, no. 1, pp. 193–201.

[28]  Ewing, R. and Cervero, R. (2010) ‘Travel and the Built Environment’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 265–294.

[29]  Gordon, P. and Richardson, H. W. (1996) ‘Beyond Polycentricity: The Dispersed Metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970-1990’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 289– 295.

[30]  Bento, A. M., Cropper, M. L., Mobarak, A. M. and Vinha, K. (2005) ‘The Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Travel Demand in the United States’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 466–478.

[31]  Silva, J. d. A. e., Golob, T. F. and Goulias, K. G. (2006) ‘Effects of Land Use Characteristics on Residence and Employment Location and Travel Behavior of Urban Adult Workers’, Smart Growth and Sustainable Development, Geo-Journal Library 122, vol. 1977, no. 1, pp. 121– 131.

Statistics
Article View: 505
PDF Download: 519