Elimination of the subject in the texts of the ancient Egyptian language (intermediate stage) | ||||
| International Journal of Advanced Studies in World Archaeology | ||||
| Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2021, Page 186-200 PDF (1.01 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ijaswa.2021.187046 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Hussein Abdo Khalifa | ||||
| Assistant teacher at the Faculty of Archeology in Qena | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| delete It is a term used in linguistics to refer to the absence of a specific linguistic unit in the sentence in which it is understood From the context, and according to Schenkel’s opinion, Elimination: It is the non-repetition of the additions that are attached to the core of the sentence if The sentence is compound and contains more than one sub-sentence. And Mahmoud Al-Ham said that the deletion appears in The first position of the dependent sentence, provided that it does not affect it from the grammatical point of view, and there is a relationship between the sentence Which contains the deletion and the previous sentence in terms of meaning. Borchot sees it as reducing the additions that Appended in bulk provided that it does not affect the integrity of the subject, as is known for example the omission of the introductory article iw, and through this, the researcher sees that deletion is the omission of any element of the sentence, either for the purpose of brevity In speech if the meaning is clear and implicitly understood, and therefore there is no need to mention the omitted element, or for necessity We note that omission is of two types: obligatory omission: which, in the case of linguistic necessity, may be For the purpose of constructing the unknown, ordering, requesting, or wishing. Permissible omission: It is for the purpose of brevity in speech when The meaning is clear and understood implicitly, and therefore there is no need to mention it, as the element may be deleted or not. be delete In the ancient Egyptian language, usually in compound sentences that contain more than one sub-clause, where the At least there is one or more main clauses, and the main clause expresses the main event and may be accompanied by subordinate main clauses These sentences are often linked in the Arabic language by the conjunction (and), but in the ancient Egyptian language These sentences are listed successively without a linking tool, where the linking of the sentences understands each other through the sentence relationship The sentence preceding it, and when there is a common part between these sentences is often omitted and is implied by During the context of speech where it represents the same thing in the previous sentence and therefore there is no need to repeat it again. This part may be an introductory tool used to open the speech, so there is no need to repeat it in the middle of the speech or a predicate In the case of the nominative sentence, it can also be a subject or object in the phrasal verb, and this is what the research will include Through the main element in the sentence structure, which is the subject, as it was deleted in many texts and there are many Its positions and causes in the ancient Egyptian language through literary and religious texts in the Middle Ages (2140 BC to 1360 BC). | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Elimination; ancient Egyptian; language; (intermediate stage) | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 117 PDF Download: 336 |
||||
