Contribution of Nano-Silica in Affecting Some of the Physico-Chemical Properties of Cultivated Soil with the Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article 3, Volume 25, Issue 4 - Serial Number 97, December 2020, Page 389-400 PDF (513.33 K) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Document Type: Research papers | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: 10.21608/jalexu.2020.189536 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
View on SCiNiTO | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Author | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abdullah Hassan Al-Saeedi | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, College of Agricultural and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P. O. Box 420, Al-Hassa 31982, Saudi Arabia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
:Nano-silica can be used as a soil amendment to improve the physicochemical properties and crop productivity. Five rates of Nano-silica suspensions (0, 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg Si-NPs kg -1 soil) were used in the current experiment to investigate the effects of Nano-silica on some chemical and physical properties added to sandy loam soil before bean plant cultivation during the 2018-2019 season. This experiment used a random complete design with three replicates. According to the findings, nano-silica rates have a substantial impact on the percentage of clay particles, cation exchange capacity (CEC), sodium adsorption rate (SAR), porosity, saturation percentage, specific surface area (SSA), total N, and Si+4. With increasing nano-silica rates salinity (EC), Ca++, and Mg++decreased due to the additional uptake by plant, the bean crop yield increased with the increase of nano-silica (Si-NPs) treatments up to 200 mg.kg -1 and reduced with increasing (Si-NPs) at 400 mg. kg -1. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keywords | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nanosilica; CEC; pH; Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris); Porosity; Crop Yield; Specific Surface Area; SAR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Text | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION Silicon (Si) is the second most abundant element in the earth's crust. Although all plants contain silicon (Si) in their tissues, the concentration among plant species ranges from 0.1 to 10 % on a dry weight basis (Epstein, 2009). Silicon exists primarily in the form of mineral silicates, alumino-silicates, and silicon dioxide (SiO2), however, most of these forms are unattainable to the plants. As the only molecular species that can cross the root plasma membrane at physiological pH, and plants can absorb silicon only in the form of mono silicic acid (H4SiO4), which naturally exists in the soil (Raven, 2001). However, the concentration depends on soil texture, properties, pH, organic matter, minerals present (Tubaña & Heckman, 2015), and soil moisture conditions (Ma & Takahashi, 2002; Takahashi, 1974). Many research studies have demonstrated that the positive contribution of silicon on the physical, biochemical and molecular alteration in plants alleviates plant tolerance to abiotic stress (drought, salinity, and heavy metals, et al.) and biotic stress (bacteria, fungi, viruses, insects, and herbivores) (Al-Huqail et al., 2019; A. Alsaeedi et al., 2017, 2018, 2019; Etesami & Jeong, 2018; Javaid et al., 2019; Manivannan et al., 2016; Mathur & Roy, 2020; Romero, 2011; Ullah et al., 2016).Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Si-NPs) have fascinated researchers over the last decade due to their unique and multifaced physiochemical properties (Jeelani et al., 2020). Silica nanoparticle (Si-NPs) is non-toxic for the plant, is small in size at between 10-100 nm, has a highly specific surface area reach 350 m2.g-1, and has great absorption capacity by the plant cells (Asgari et al., 2018; Jeelani et al., 2020; Rastogi et al., 2019). Rastogi et al. (2019) and Mathur & Roy, (2020) reviewed the benefits and the impactions of using silica nanoparticles (Si-NPs) on plant and agricultural productivity. Other studies showed a positive impact of using silica nanoparticles (Si-NPs) during the different plant growth (A. Alsaeedi et al., 2017, 2018, 2019; Karunakaran et al., 2013; Mathur & Roy, 2020; Rastogi et al., 2019; Suriyaprabha et al., 2012; Yuvakkumar et al., 2011). It is known that the synthetic silica nanoparticles (Si-NPs) have the same quality and functionality as a source for the beneficial element Si similar to natural silica, but with a non-toxic effect (Asgari et al., 2018; Karunakaran et al., 2013; Nazaralian et al., 2017; Schaller et al., 2019). As silicic acid or nanoparticles, silicon improves the nutrient availability in soil and the uptake capacity by plants. The positive correlation between phosphorus (P) availability and mobilization in soil with silicon content was demonstrated by (Neu et al., 2017; Schaller et al., 2019; Schaller, Frei, et al., 2020). Silicon improved nutrient uptake by plants, i.e., nitrogen and phosphorus (Neu et al., 2017; Seyfferth & Fendorf, 2012; Subramanian & Gopalswamy, 1991), potassium (Pati et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2005), iron (Mali & Aery, 2009), and macro and micronutrients as cited by (Adams et al., 2020; A. Alsaeedi et al., 2019). Also, soil water storage capacity was significantly improved with the application of silica nanoparticles (Schaller, Cramer, et al., 2020; Schaller, Frei, et al., 2020). Sandy soil characterized with scantly physicochemical properties made it improper for efficient agricultural production as it resulted in low water retention and high infiltration rates, poor structural development, neglected organic matter, clay content, and easily lost nutrients via leaching (El-Saied et al., 2016; Hartmann & Lesturgez, 1995). The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) is considered the most important cultivated legume in the world. Its cultivation is of vital importance along with maize. These two food items constitute the diet of a large part of the world population, providing the largest part of the protein (Arenas-Romero et al., 2013). This work investigates the effect of applying silica nanoparticles (Si-NPs) to the plant, through the soil, on some physical and chemical properties of root zone soil.
MATERIAL AND METHODS 2.1 Greenhouse experiment: A greenhouse experiment was carried out at the Agricultural and Veterinary Training Research Station at King Faisal University in Al-Hassa, Saudi Arabia, in 2016-2017. The soil at the experimental site was sandy (sand 99.48%, silt 0.25%, and clay 0.27%), having a pH (7.5), salinity (832 ppm), and OM (< 0.05%). Random complete design with three replicates was conducted in a greenhouse. Five treatments of synthesized hydrophilic silica nanoparticles (Si-NPs) (Aerosil 300 produced by Evonik Industries, Germany) were applied Si-NPs at rates 0, 100, 200, 300, 400 mg.kg -1 to the soil before the transplanting of the common bean plant. Fertilizers (NPK) were supplied equally for all treatments according to the local program. The distance between rows was 75 cm and between two plants in the same row was 50 cm each. 2.2 Soil preparation and analysis The soil samples were collected from the surface at a depth of 0-50 cm after harvesting. The soil was air-dried and sieved using a square hole sieve of 2 mm mesh to remove stones and other residual materials. Soil salinity, pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), Sodium absorption rate (SAR), total nitrogen (N-3), Calcium (Ca++), Magnesium (Mg++), Sodium (Na+), silicon (Si+4), and saturation percentage (%) were measured according to (Frantz et al., 2008; Sparks et al., 2020). Soil particle analysis (clay), Specific surface area (SSA), and porosity were quantified (Klute, 1986). 2.3 Statistical analysis All data were analyzed statistically by the XLSTAT software package. Experiments were set up in a completely randomized design with three replicates for each treatment. When a significant difference was observed between treatments, multiple comparisons were made by Fisher’s test. Significant differences were accepted at the p level ≤ 0.05.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 3.1 Physical properties 3.1.1 Clay percentage Analysis of variance showed a significant increase in the percentage of clay among the four treatments compared to the zero Si-NPs treatment (control), as shown in Table 1 and Fig. (1). The result was highly expected due to the nanosize of the added silica. Nanoparticles, including clay and Si-NPs, increased tenfold at Si-NPs400 more than the control. Analysis of variance resulted in a highly positive significant relationship between the treatment and clay percentage p < 0.0001 and high correlation (R=0.98). The increase in nanomaterial in sandy soil environments adds a colloidal effect which can enhance the soil hydraulics and chemical properties (Goldberg et al., 2011). As reported by Kim et al. (2014), nano-silica showed a highly negative zeta potential charge in the pH ranging from 3-13. Through water absorption, Si-NPs is turned into a viscous gel behaving like a clay colloid and consequently increases the bonding and connections between particles (Changizi & Haddad, 2016). 3.1.2 Porosity High correlations were found between Si-NPs treatments and porosity (R=0.96) Figure (1B). Also, p=0.00013 (Table 1) indicated that the pore volume increased in the soil as we add Si-NPs. Nanoparticles accumulated in the large pores of sandy soil to create a new microporosity inside the macropores. However, that reflected positively on the overall porosity. This finding results are in agreement with the other research studies (Bayat et al., 2019; Ben-Moshe et al., 2013; Zhang, 2007). 3.1.3 Saturation The saturation percentage increased by 36% from the control (Si-PNs0) to the fifth treatment (Si-NPs400). The highly significant value of pet al., 2019; Pérez-Hernández et al., 2020; Ren & Hu, 2014; Schaller, Cramer, et al., 2020). 3.1.4 Specific surface area (SSA) Although a small quantity of Si-NPs was added to the soil, the effect was tremendously large, as shown in Figure (1D) and Table (1). The increases in SSA reached 80% (about 141 m2 g-1) compared to the control with Si-NPs400. Table (1) shows a highly significant p<0.0001, and the correlation coefficient (R) was equal to 0.98. SSA is the most effective property in the soil at Si-NPs treatment, leading to many Physico-chemical properties changes (Ghormade et al., 2011; Pérez-Hernández et al., 2020). Bayat et al. (2019) stated the positive effects of different nanomaterials on soil surface area using magnesium oxide MgO. 3.2 Chemical Properties 3.2.1 Salinity (EC) Soil soluble salts depicted in Table (1) and Figure (1G) show a high negative correlation (R= -0.99) and a significant effect of Si-NPs treatment p<0.0001, salts concentration in soil reduced as Si-NPs treatment increased. That could be due to the low level of cations and anions in the soil, as discussed later in this paper. 3.2.2 Cation exchangeable capacity (CEC) As the value of CEC is always positively related to the specific surface area of the soil, the increase of the CEC value in this experiment was highly anticipated with the addition of nano-silica. Si-NPs400 increased the CEC up to 20% versus the control (Si-NPs=0). The analysis of the variance Table (1) showed highly significant effects from Si-NPs treatments p,0.0001. Correlation, Figure (1E), is also highly significant (R=0.99). Also, there is a positive high significant correlation between CEC and SSA and high correlation (R=0.97) Figure (1F). The result of this paper agrees with results from other researchers who examined the effects of nanomaterials (El-Saied et al., 2016; Fitriatin et al., 2018; Rihayat et al., 2018). 3.2.2 pH Soil pH did not show a significant relationship with soil Si+4 content (R=0.05) Figure (1H), although analysis of variance for Si-NPs treatments showed a slightly significant p=0.009 with a correlation coefficient (R=0.89) Table (1). Si-NPs200 and Si-NPs300 had the highest pH with values of 7.35 and 7.30, respectively Figure (1H). Si-NPs has a low pH ranging between 3.7-4.5. The slight increase in pH value in Si-NPs200 and Si-NPs300 could be a result of the increase in nutrient solubility in the soil such as Na+ and decrease of some due to the excellent growth and crop yields such as Ca++ and K+ content (Al-Busaidi & Cookson, 2003; Kool et al., 2011). 3.2.3 Calcium and Magnesium soil content (Ca++, Mg++) The results shown in Table (1) demonstrated the highly significant effect of Si-NPs addition with calcium pp=0.001. Calcium content decreased in the soil as Si content increased Figure (1A). In this study, Ca++ and Mg++ content in the soil decreased as Si+4 content increased with negative correlation (-0.99) and (-0.95), respectively Figures (2B&D). The explanation for this could be due firstly to Si increasing the solubility and mobility of nutrients in the soil, making it readily available to plant (Aqaei et al., 2020), and secondly to the improvement in the plant growth and metabolism process which maximized nutrient uptake by the root, in particular, Ca++ and Mg++ (Ditta & Arshad, 2016; Mathur & Roy, 2020). 3.2.4. Sodium (Na+) Data analysis of the effect of Si-NPs on the level of sodium in the soil did not show any significant difference between all treatments except Si-NPs400, which is 14% higher than others Table (1) and Figures (2E&F). It is well documented that silicon reduces the plant's sodium uptake (Ahmad et al., 1992; A. H. Alsaeedi et al., 2017; Yeo et al., 1999). Figure (2F) shows no significant relationship between silicon content in the soil and sodium content with a poor correlation coefficient. The accumulated sodium in the soil due to root absorption selectivity under silicon treatment could be affected by the irrigation water, which leaches sodium and weakens bonds outside the root zone (Matthew & Akinyele, 2014). That could explain the nonsignificant effect of Si-NPs treatments 0-300 on sodium content in the soil. 3.2.5 Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) The high value of unutilized or excluded sodium in the soil due to the silicon's positive effect on the root absorption mechanism was reflected in SAR values (Table 1 and Fig. 2G). For this reason, Si-NPs400 recorded the highest SAR with 20% average increases compared with other treatments. Si-NPs400 showed a highly significant effect p 3.2.6 Nitrogen (N) Analysis of the variance showed the highly significant effect of Si-NPs treatments on nitrogen levels in the soil pet al., 2020) and to the positive effect of silicon in reducing the nitrogen leaching from soil (Bocharnikova & Matichenkov, 2010; Matichenkov et al., 2020; Matichenkov & Bocharnikova, 2001). 3.2.7 Silicon (Si+4) As expected, the value of soil silica was increased significantly as Si-NPs treatment increased with p-1, then Si-NPs300, 200, and 100 with a value of 139.81, 95.83, and 61.11 mg kg-1, respectively. Many researchers report similar results for directly increasing soil content from silicon linearly with the added amount or dosage (Ma & Takahashi, 2002; Matichenkov et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020). 3.3 Yield The analysis of variance showed a significant effect of Si-NPs applications in improving the final yield of common bean (as bean) p<0.0001, as indicated in Table (1). Si-NPs300 demonstrated the maximum yield of 63.27 g plant-1, Si-NPs 400, 200,100, and 0 showed 59.30, 58.27, 57.26, and 55.57 respectively Figure (3E). Si-NPs400 showed a reduction of 7.2%, Si-NPs200 reduction was equal to 8.8%, Si-NPs100 also showed a reduction of 10.4%. Finally, Si-NPs0 showed a reduction in yield reached 13%. These results, supported by many references and research studies, prove silicon's positive effect in increasing the yield and physiological operation during plant life ( Alsaeedi et al., 2017, 2019; Etesami & Jeong, 2018; Javaid et al., 2019).
CONCLUSION It can be inferred that adding nano-silica to soil increased of the clay soil content, and consequently, the saturation percentage, specific surface area (SSA), cation exchange capacity (CEC), porosity, and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). At the Si-NPs200 rate, the improvement of these properties enhanced the total nitrogen (N) in the soil and accordingly increased the yield of the common bean. The use of nano-silica particles in soil reduced the average of salinity, soluble Ca2+, and Mg2+.
Table 1: Mean of a square of clay, porosity, saturation, SSA, salinity (EC), pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), soluble Ca2+, Mg2+ and Na+, Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), available nitrogen (N), soluble silicon (Si+4) in the soil after pean harvesting of pean and the yield under the effect of different rates of Nano-silica amendment.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REFRENCES
Adams, C. B., Erickson, J. E., & Bunderson, L. (2020). A mesoporous silica nanoparticle technology applied in dilute nutrient solution accelerated establishment of zoysiagrass. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20006
Ahmad, R., Zaheer, S. H., & Ismail, S. (1992). Role of silicon in salt tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Science, 85(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(92)90092-Z
Al-Busaidi, A., & Cookson, P. (2003). Salinity – pH Relationships in Calcareous Soils of Oman. Journal for Scientific Research. Agricultural and Marine Sciences, 8(1), 41–46.
Al-Huqail, A. A., Alqarawi, A. A., Hashem, A., Ahmad Malik, J., & Abd_Allah, E. F. (2019). Silicon supplementation modulates antioxidant system and osmolyte accumulation to balance salt stress in Acacia gerrardii Benth. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26(7), 1856–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.11.049
Alsaeedi, A., El-Ramady, H., Alshaal, T., & Almohsen, M. (2017). Enhancing seed germination and seedlings development of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) by SiO2 nanoparticles. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 57(4), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejss.2017.891.1098
Alsaeedi, A., El-Ramady, H., Alshaal, T., El-Garawani, M., Elhawat, N., & Al-Otaibi, A. (2018). Exogenous nanosilica improves germination and growth of cucumber by maintaining K+/Na+ ratio under elevated Na+ stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 125(April 2018), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.006
Alsaeedi, A., El-Ramady, H., Alshaal, T., El-Garawany, M., Elhawat, N., & Al-Otaibi, A. (2019). Silica nanoparticles boost growth and productivity of cucumber under water deficit and salinity stresses by balancing nutrients uptake. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 139(March), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.03.008
Alsaeedi, A. H., El-Ramady, H., Alshaal, T., El-Garawani, M., Elhawat, N., & Almohsen, M. (2017). Engineered silica nanoparticles alleviate the detrimental effects of Na+ stress on germination and growth of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(27), 21917–21928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9847-y
Aqaei, P., Weisany, W., Diyanat, M., Razmi, J., & Struik, P. C. (2020). Response of maize ( Zea mays L.) to potassium nano-silica application under drought stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(9), 1205–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1727508
Arenas-Romero, O., Huato-Damián, M. A., Tapia-Rivera, J. A., Simón-Báez, A., Lara-Huerta, M., & Huerta-Cabrera, E. (2013). The Nutritional value of Beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L .) and its importance for Feeding of Rural communities in Puebla-Mexico. Journal of Biological Sciences, 2(8), 59–65.
Asgari, F., Majd, A., Jonoubi, P., & Najafi, F. (2018). Effects of silicon nanoparticles on molecular, chemical, structural and ultrastructural characteristics of oat (Avena sativa L.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 127(March), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.021
Bayat, H., Kolahchi, Z., Valaey, S., Rastgou, M., & Mahdavi, S. (2019). Iron and magnesium nano-oxide effects on some physical and mechanical properties of a loamy Hypocalcic Cambisol. Geoderma, 335, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.007
Ben-Moshe, T., Frenk, S., Dror, I., Minz, D., & Berkowitz, B. (2013). Effects of metal oxide nanoparticles on soil properties. Chemosphere, 90(2), 640–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.018
Bocharnikova, E. A., & Matichenkov, V. V. (2010). Theory and practice of silicon fertilizers. Del 6 Al 9 de Octubre de 2010, 5(9), 390. http://orgprints.org/29758/1/actas-lleida-vd.pdf#page=391
Changizi, F., & Haddad, A. (2016). Effect of Nano-SiO2 on the Geotechnical Properties of Cohesive Soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 34(2), 725–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9962-9
Ditta, A., & Arshad, M. (2016). Applications and perspectives of using nanomaterials for sustainable plant nutrition. Nanotechnology Reviews, 5(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2015-0060
El-Saied, H., El-Hady, O. A., Basta, A. H., El-Dewiny, C. Y., & Abo-Sedera, S. A. (2016). Bio-chemical properties of sandy calcareous soil treated with rice straw-based hydrogels. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 15(2), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2014.11.004
Epstein, E. (2009). Silicon: its manifold roles in plants. Annals of Applied Biology, 155(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2009.00343.x
Etesami, H., & Jeong, B. R. (2018). Silicon (Si): Review and future prospects on the action mechanisms in alleviating biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 147(May 2017), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.063
Fitriatin, B. N., Arifin, M., Devnita, R., Yuniarti, A., Haryanto, R., & Setiabudi, M. A. (2018). P retention and cation exchange as affected by nanoparticle of volcanic ash and application of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on Andisol Ciater, West Java, Indonesia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1927, 030025. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5021218
Frantz, J. M., Locke, J. C., Datnoff, L., Omer, M., Widrig, A., Sturtz, D., Horst, L., & Krause, C. R. (2008). Detection, Distribution, and Quantification of Silicon in Floricultural Crops utilizing Three Distinct Analytical Methods. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 39(17–18), 2734–2751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620802358912
Ghormade, V., Deshpande, M. V., & Paknikar, K. M. (2011). Perspectives for nano-biotechnology enabled protection and nutrition of plants. Biotechnology Advances, 29(6), 792–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.007
Goldberg, S., Lebron, I., Seaman, J. C., & Suarez, D. L. (2011). Soil Colloidal Behavior. In P. M. Huang, Y. Li, & M. E. Sumner (Eds.), Handbook of Soil Sciences Properties and Processes. Routledge Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11267-17
Hartmann, C., & Lesturgez, G. (1995). Physical properties of tropical sandy soils : A large range of behaviours. Group, v, 1–10. http://www.archive.org/details/plantrelationsfi00coul
Javaid, T., Farooq, M. A., Akhtar, J., Saqib, Z. A., & Anwar-ul-Haq, M. (2019). Silicon nutrition improves growth of salt-stressed wheat by modulating flows and partitioning of Na+, Cl− and mineral ions. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 141(June), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.06.010
Jeelani, P. G., Mulay, P., Venkat, R., & Ramalingam, C. (2020). Multifaceted Application of Silica Nanoparticles. A Review. Silicon, 12(6), 1337–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00229-y
Karunakaran, G., Suriyaprabha, R., Manivasakan, P., Yuvakkumar, R., Rajendran, V., Prabu, P., & Kannan, N. (2013). Effect of nanosilica and silicon sources on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, soil nutrients and maize seed germination. IET Nanobiotechnology, 7(3), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2012.0048
Kim, K. M., Kim, H. M., Lee, W. J., Lee, C. W., Kim, T. Il, Lee, J. K., Jeong, J., Paek, S. M., & Oh, J. M. (2014). Surface treatment of silica nanoparticles for stable and charge-controlled colloidal silica. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 9, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S57922
Klute, A. (Ed.). (1986). Methods of Soil Analysis. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed
Kool, P. L., Ortiz, M. D., & Van Gestel, C. A. M. (2011). Chronic toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles, non-nano ZnO and ZnCl 2 to Folsomia candida (Collembola) in relation to bioavailability in soil. Environmental Pollution, 159(10), 2713–2719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.05.021
Ma, J. F., & Takahashi, E. (2002). Soil, Fertilizer, and Plant Silicon Research in Japan. In Soil, Fertilizer, and Plant Silicon Research in Japan. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51166-9.X5000-3
Mali, M., & Aery, N. C. (2009). Effect of Silicon on Growth, Biochemical Constituents, and Mineral Nutrition of Cowpea. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 40(7–8), 1041–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620902753590
Manivannan, A., Soundararajan, P., Muneer, S., Ko, C. H., & Jeong, B. R. (2016). Silicon mitigates salinity stress by regulating the physiology, antioxidant enzyme activities, and protein expression in Capsicum annuum “Bugwang.” BioMed Research International, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3076357
Mathur, P., & Roy, S. (2020). Nanosilica facilitates silica uptake, growth and stress tolerance in plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 157(May), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.10.011
Matichenkov, V., Bocharnikova, E., & Campbell, J. (2020). Reduction in nutrient leaching from sandy soils by Si-rich materials: Laboratory, greenhouse and filed studies. Soil and Tillage Research, 196(September 2019), 104450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104450
Matichenkov, V. V., & Bocharnikova, E. A. (2001). The relationship between silicon and soil physical and chemical properties V. In Lawrence E. Datnoff, G. H. Snyder, & G. H. Korndörfer (Eds.), Silicon in Agriculture (pp. 209–219). Elsevier Science B.V. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12605.003.0016
Matthew, A., & Akinyele, A. (2014). Sodium and Calcium Salts Impact on Soil Permeability. Journal of Earth Sciences and …, 4(3), 37–45. http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/GEO/Vol 4_3_3.pdf
Nazaralian, S., Majd, A., Irian, S., Najafi, F., Ghahremaninejad, F., Landberg, T., & Greger, M. (2017). Comparison of silicon nanoparticles and silicate treatments in fenugreek. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 115, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.03.009
Neu, S., Schaller, J., & Dudel, E. G. (2017). Silicon availability modifies nutrient use efficiency and content, C:N:P stoichiometry, and productivity of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Scientific Reports, 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40829
Pati, S., Pal, B., Badole, S., Hazra, G. C., & Mandal, B. (2016). Effect of Silicon Fertilization on Growth, Yield, and Nutrient Uptake of Rice. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 47(3), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2015.1122797
Pérez-Hernández, H., Fernández-Luqueño, F., Huerta-Lwanga, E., Mendoza-Vega, J., & Álvarez-Solís José, D. (2020). Effect of engineered nanoparticles on soil biota: Do they improve the soil quality and crop production or jeopardize them? Land Degradation and Development, 31(16), 2213–2230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3595
Rastogi, A., Tripathi, D. K., Yadav, S., Chauhan, D. K., Živčák, M., Ghorbanpour, M., El-Sheery, N. I., & Brestic, M. (2019). Application of silicon nanoparticles in agriculture. 3 Biotech, 9(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1626-7
Raven, J. A. (2001). Chapter 3 Silicon transport at the cell and tissue level. In L E Datnoff, G. H. Snyder, & G. H. Korndörfer (Eds.), Silicon in Agriculture (Vol. 8, pp. 41–55). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-3420(01)80007-0
Ren, X., & Hu, K. (2014). Effect of nanosilica on the physical and mechanical properties of silty clay. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters, 6(11), 1010–1013. https://doi.org/10.1166/nnl.2014.1857
Rihayat, T., Salim, S., Arlina, A., Fona, Z., Jalal, R., Alam, P. N., Zaimahwati, Sami, M., Syarif, J., & Juhan, N. (2018). Determination of CEC value ( Cation Exchange Capacity ) of Bentonites from North Aceh and Bener Meriah, Aceh Province, Indonesia using three methods. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 334(1), 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/334/1/012054
Romero, A. (2011). Silicon and plant diseases . A review El silicio y las enfermedades de las plantas . Una revisión. 29(3), 473–480.
Schaller, J., Cramer, A., Carminati, A., & Zarebanadkouki, M. (2020). Biogenic amorphous silica as main driver for plant available water in soils. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59437-x
Schaller, J., Faucherre, S., Joss, H., Obst, M., Goeckede, M., Planer-Friedrich, B., Peiffer, S., Gilfedder, B., & Elberling, B. (2019). Silicon increases the phosphorus availability of Arctic soils. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37104-6
Schaller, J., Frei, S., Rohn, L., & Gilfedder, B. S. (2020). Amorphous Silica Controls Water Storage Capacity and Phosphorus Mobility in Soils. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8(July). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00094
Seyfferth, A. L., & Fendorf, S. (2012). Silicate Mineral Impacts on the Uptake and Storage of Arsenic and Plant Nutrients in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environmental Science & Technology, 46(24), 13176–13183. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3025337
Singh, A. K., Singh, R., & Singh, K. (2005). Growth, yield and economics of rice (Oryza sativa) as influenced by level and time of silicon application. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 3, 190–193.
Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., & Loeppert, R. H. (Eds.). (2020). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3: Chemical Methods. American Sciety of Agronomy Ins.
Subramanian, S., & Gopalswamy, A. (1991). Effect of moisture, organic matter, phosphate and silicate on availability of silicon and phosphorus in rice soils. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 39(1), 99–103.
Suriyaprabha, R., Karunakaran, G., Yuvakkumar, R., Prabu, P., Rajendran, V., & Kannan, N. (2012). Growth and physiological responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to porous silica nanoparticles in soil. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-012-1294-6
Takahashi, E. (1974). Effect of Soil Moisture on the Uptake of Silica by Rice Plant Seedlings. Journal of the Science of Soil and Manure, Japan, 45(12). https://doi.org/10.20710/dojo.45.12_591
Tubaña, B. S., & Heckman, J. R. (2015). Silicon in Soils and Plants. In Silicon and Plant Diseases (pp. 7–51). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22930-0_2
Ullah, U., Ashraf, M., Shahzad, S. M., Siddiqui, A. R., Piracha, M. A., & Suleman, M. (2016). Growth behavior of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under drought stress in the presence of silicon and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Soil and Environment, 35(1), 65–75.
Xu, D., Gao, T., Fang, X., Bu, H., Li, Q., Wang, X., & Zhang, R. (2020). Silicon addition improves plant productivity and soil nutrient availability without changing the grass:legume ratio response to N fertilization. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67333-7
Yeo, A. R., Flowers, S. A., Rao, G., Welfare, K., Senanayake, N., & Flowers, T. J. (1999). Silicon reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in saline conditions and this is accounted for by a reduction in the transpirational bypass flow. Plant, Cell and Environment, 22(5), 559–565. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00418.x
Yuvakkumar, R., Elango, V., Rajendran, V., Kannan, N. S., & Prabu, P. (2011). Influence of nanosilica powder on the growth of maize crop (Zea Mays L.). International Journal of Green Nanotechnology: Biomedicine, 3(3), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/19430892.2011.628581
Zhang, G. (2007). Soil Nanoparticles and their Influence on Engineering Properties of Soils. Advances in Measurement and Modeling of Soil Behavior, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/40917(236)37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistics Article View: 272 PDF Download: 452 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||