WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR IRRIGATED SUGARCANE UNDER TRICKLE IRRIGATION | ||||
Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
Article 66, Volume 25, Issue 4, October 2008, Page 1343-1357 PDF (386.6 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2008.190271 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
M. Hanafy1; A. Mahrous2; M. Z. El Garib3 | ||||
1Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Ag., Cairo Univ., Egypt. | ||||
2Assis. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Ag., Cairo Univ., Egypt. | ||||
3Agric. Engineer, Private Sector., Egypt. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Effect of irrigation water requirements and row spacing of surface and subsurface trickle irrigated sugarcane on soil moisture distribution, sugarcane yield, sugar percentage and water use efficiency were studied. There are three different lateral distance between plants (L) used in the experiment; 0.75 m, 1.00 m and 1.25 m under four irrigation treatments; 70%, 85%, 100% and 115% from water requirements of sugarcane. Soil moisture content was affected by different water requirements and row spacing. While the average soil moisture content in the upper layer (0 – 20cm) under subsurface trickle irrigation was less than under surface trickle irrigation, it was in subsurface trickle irrigation more than in surface trickle irrigation in lower layer (30 – 50cm). The results of this work indicated that the maximum yield production is 70 ton/fed under surface trickle irrigation system, 1.25 m distance between plants and at 85% of water requirements of sugarcane. Also the results indicated that the maximum yield production is 70 ton/fed under sub-surface trickle irrigation system, 1.00 m and 1.25 m distance between plants and at 100% and 85% of water requirements of sugarcane respectively. A crop coefficient curve for sugarcane was plotted for measuring crop evapotranspiration. | ||||
References | ||||
Abu Zeid, M. 1995. International water-save programs and water-save activities. In: Hamdy A (Ed) Water Saving: Prospects and Challenges (1, pp. 1-18) Cairo, Egypt. Allen, R.G., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes and M. Smith, 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and Drainage. Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, pp: 300. Bastug, R. 1987. A study on determining the water production functions of cotton under Cukurova conditions (PhD.). CukurovaUniv., Adana, lIT. and Drain. Dept (pp. 120). Bruggeman, A., I. McCann, T. Oweis and M. Pala. 2005. Improved decision making for deficit irrigation of wheat in northern Syria. Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org. Hanafy, M. and Bakeer., G. 1994. Optimum trickleline placement depth in subsurface trickle irrigation in clay soils. Misr, J. Ag. Eng., 11 (4): October, 1994. Kanber, R., Onder, S., M. Koksal, and Waetherhead, E. K., (1993). Comparison of surge and continuous furrow methods in Harran Plain in GAP area. Final report, on Irr. And Soil Project. Adana, 52 p. Misra, R. D. 1973. Response of corn to different sequences of water stress as measured by evapotranspiration deficits. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of California, Davis Stewart, N., and R. M. Hagan.1973. Functions to predict effects of crops water deficits. J. Irrig. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 99: 421-439 Stewart, N., R. M. Hagan and W. O. Pruitt. 1976. Production functions and predicted irrigation programs for principal crops as required for water resources planning and increased water use efficiency. Final Rep. U.S. Dept. of Interior, Bur. of Reclamation, Washington, D.C.
Stewart, N., R. H. Cuenca, W. O. Pruitt, R. M. Hagan and J. Tosso. 1977. Determination and utilization of water production functions for principal California crops. W-67 Calif Contributing Proj. Rep. University of California, Davis Tekinel O & Kanber R 1979. Cukurovakosullarinda kisintili su kullanma durumunda pamugun su tuketimi ve verimi (pp 39). TOPRAKSU Arast. Enst. Yay.98(48),TarsusTurkey. Yalcuk, H. and H. M. Ozkara. l984. The effects of omitted irrigation on cotton production in West Anatolia Region. Soil-Water Res. Ins. Pup. No. 107, Izmir (pp. 35). | ||||
Statistics Article View: 134 PDF Download: 116 |
||||