Recovery of Some Valuable Elements from Highly Ferruginous Shale, Um Bogma Formation, Wadi Um Hamed, South Western Sinai, Egypt. | ||||
The Bulletin Tabbin Institute for Metallurgical Studies (TIMS) | ||||
Volume 109, Issue 1, August 2021, Page 54-71 PDF (775.66 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original research papers | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/tims.2021.191718 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
H. A. Radwan1; A. A. Faheim2; E. M. El-Sheikh1; Z. H. Abd El-Wahab2; M. A. Gado1 | ||||
1Geology of isotopes, Nuclear Materials Authority, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
2Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Girls), Youssif Abbas St., Nasr-City, Cairo, Egypt, P.O. Box 11754. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
The present work describes a study of the acidic pug leaching technique for U- extraction in addition to some associated valuable metals from a collected technological sample of ferruginous shale from Wadi Um Hamed of Um Bogma Formation at Abu Thor locality of southwestern Sinai, Egypt. A representative sample of the ore material was found to assay 900, 700 and 400 ppm of REEs, U and Cu, respectively in addition to some major and minor oxides. Numerous steps were perform upon the studied sample to process parametric studies like sulfuric acid concentration (50-150 kg/ton), curing time (0.5-5.0 h) and curing temperature (50-150°C) in order to assess the best one giving the optimum conditions. Under the optimal conditions (150 kg/ton sulfuric acid for 4.0 h at 150°C), the first step involved Fe-removal as hydroxide from the pregnant leaching solution using pH adjustment method followed by U- recovery through sorption / desorption and precipitation steps with the help of Amberlite IRA-400-Cl (strongly basic anion exchange resin) via column method. In the third step, REEs- recovery from U- free effluent was investigated using oxalic acid precipitation process while Cu- recovery by precipitation as hydroxide with ammonia solution was tack place. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Uranium; Wadi Um Hamed; Southwestern Sinai; Egypt; Pug leaching efficiency; Kinetic modeling | ||||
Statistics Article View: 172 PDF Download: 121 |
||||