The efficacy of both locally prepared vaccines against foot and mouth disease in cattle in Monofeia governorate
Shaban, E., Ibrahim, F., Abo-Sakaya, R., Salem, S. (2021). The efficacy of both locally prepared vaccines against foot and mouth disease in cattle in Monofeia governorate. EKB Journal Management System, 40(2), 179-183. doi: 10.21608/bvmj.2021.68643.1380
Ehab F. Shaban; Faysal K. Ibrahim; Rania Yahya Abo-Sakaya; Sayed A. H. Salem. "The efficacy of both locally prepared vaccines against foot and mouth disease in cattle in Monofeia governorate". EKB Journal Management System, 40, 2, 2021, 179-183. doi: 10.21608/bvmj.2021.68643.1380
Shaban, E., Ibrahim, F., Abo-Sakaya, R., Salem, S. (2021). 'The efficacy of both locally prepared vaccines against foot and mouth disease in cattle in Monofeia governorate', EKB Journal Management System, 40(2), pp. 179-183. doi: 10.21608/bvmj.2021.68643.1380
Shaban, E., Ibrahim, F., Abo-Sakaya, R., Salem, S. The efficacy of both locally prepared vaccines against foot and mouth disease in cattle in Monofeia governorate. EKB Journal Management System, 2021; 40(2): 179-183. doi: 10.21608/bvmj.2021.68643.1380

The efficacy of both locally prepared vaccines against foot and mouth disease in cattle in Monofeia governorate

Benha Veterinary Medical Journal
Article 36, Volume 40, Issue 2, July 2021, Page 179-183  XML PDF (291.84 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/bvmj.2021.68643.1380
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ehab F. Shaban1; Faysal K. Ibrahim2; Rania Yahya Abo-Sakaya email 2; Sayed A. H. Salem3
1Directorate of Veterinary Medicine, Monofeia.
2Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Toukh 13736, Egypt
3Virology Department، Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, Giza
Abstract
Vaccination was the main approach to control spreading of FMD disease in Egypt. This study was carried out for evaluation of vaccination by governmental and prevailing local vaccines in cattle sera in menofia governorate during the period from October 2018 to May 2019. A total 130 serum samples were collected to evaluate the antibodies against FMDV. 30 samples were used as control, 50 samples collected from animals received local governmental vaccine and 50 samples from animals received local prevailing vaccine. 49 out of 100 serum samples (37.7%) were positive and 81 out of 130 serum samples (62.3%) were negative for NSP. Results were (0.0), 3(3.7%) pre-vaccination and 27(33.33%), 18(22.22%) 1st MPV- 25(30.86%), 18(22.22%) 2nd MPV-15(18.52%), 13(16.05%) 3rd MPV and (0.0), 9(11.11%) 4th MPV for serotype A. For serotype (O): 9(11.1%), 10(12.4%) pre-vaccination- 36(44.44%), 28(34.56%) 1st MPV-33(40.74%), 27 (33.33%) 2nd MPV-24(29.63%), 20(24.7%) 3rd MPV-14(17.3%), 12(14.80%) 4th MPV. For serotype (SAT2): 4(4.9%), 24(4.93%) pre-vaccination-30 (37.03%), 21(25.93%) 1st MPV-27(33.33%), 21(25.93%) 2nd MPV- 18 (22.22%), 14(17.3%) 3rd MPV-3 (3.71%), 4(4.93%) 4th MPV. In Conclusion. FMD controlling requires vaccines that will supply disparity of infected from vaccinated animals.
Keywords
Cattle; FMDV; NSP; ELISA kit; MPV
Statistics
Article View: 178
PDF Download: 203