METHODS OF SOCIAL PROTECTION FOR THE RURAL FAMILY IN ISMAILIA GOVERNORATE | ||||
| Sinai Journal of Applied Sciences | ||||
| Article 17, Volume 10, Issue 2, August 2021, Page 271-288 PDF (659.08 K) | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/sinjas.2021.89939.1039 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Raed Abd Elnasser Salama  1; Marwan M. Hassan2
| ||||
| 1Dept. Econ. and Rural Develop., Fac. Environ. Agric. Sci., Arish Univ., Egypt. | ||||
| 2Dept. Mang. Inst. Fam. and childhood, Fac. Home Econ., Arish Uni., Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The research aimed to identify the methods of social protection and the degree of utilization from the respondents' point of view. The research was conducted in Ismailia Governorate, and seven villages were selected from the governorate, so that each village represents one of the seven governorate centers. Using both frequencies, percentages, mean, standard deviation, simple correlation coefficient, multiple linear regression, and a reduced model (rising stepwise regression). The research reached many results, the most important of which are the following: The results showed that most of the respondents understand the meaning of the concept of social protection, and the study showed that there are 27 methods of social protection, and the average degree of benefit from them ranges between (1.22-2.63) degrees, The method that benefited the most was the right of rural people to vote and elections, with an average score of 2.63, and the least was the method of rural participation in development projects with an average score of 1.22. The results of the study showed that the ten independent variables studied together explain about 31.1% of the total variance in the total degree of the respondents' benefit from social protection methods. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Methods of Social Protection; Social Protection; Rural Family | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 158 PDF Download: 143 |
||||
