Buccal Fat Pad Reinforce Buccal Advancement Flap Vs Rotational Palatal Flap in Chronic Oroantral Fistula Treatment
Elshamaa, M., Elborolsy, S., Mahran, H. (2021). Buccal Fat Pad Reinforce Buccal Advancement Flap Vs Rotational Palatal Flap in Chronic Oroantral Fistula Treatment. EKB Journal Management System, 67(4), 3013-3021. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.82426.1691
Mohamed Mostafa Elshamaa; Samir Ali Elborolsy; Hamada Mahran. "Buccal Fat Pad Reinforce Buccal Advancement Flap Vs Rotational Palatal Flap in Chronic Oroantral Fistula Treatment". EKB Journal Management System, 67, 4, 2021, 3013-3021. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.82426.1691
Elshamaa, M., Elborolsy, S., Mahran, H. (2021). 'Buccal Fat Pad Reinforce Buccal Advancement Flap Vs Rotational Palatal Flap in Chronic Oroantral Fistula Treatment', EKB Journal Management System, 67(4), pp. 3013-3021. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.82426.1691
Elshamaa, M., Elborolsy, S., Mahran, H. Buccal Fat Pad Reinforce Buccal Advancement Flap Vs Rotational Palatal Flap in Chronic Oroantral Fistula Treatment. EKB Journal Management System, 2021; 67(4): 3013-3021. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.82426.1691

Buccal Fat Pad Reinforce Buccal Advancement Flap Vs Rotational Palatal Flap in Chronic Oroantral Fistula Treatment

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 7, Volume 67, Issue 4 - Serial Number 2, October 2021, Page 3013-3021  XML PDF (958.01 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.82426.1691
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed Mostafa Elshamaaorcid 1; Samir Ali Elborolsy email orcid 1; Hamada Mahranorcid 2
1Lecturer, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry. Beni-Suef University
2Lecturer of Maxillofacial Surgery, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Egypt
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Oroantral fistula(OAF), the most common complication after extraction of posterior maxillary teeth leading to chronic maxillary sinusitis, patient discomfort and can cause difficulty in speech, mastication, and overall hygiene of the patient. Many treatment approaches have been developed to treat OAFs; Buccal Fat Pad (BFP) as a graft material, Buccal Advancement flap (BAF) and rotational palatal flap(RPF).
Aim: To compare two treatment modalities for the management of Oroantral Fistula (OAF). We compared the clinical outcomes for both Buccal Fat Pad (BFP) reinforce Buccal Advancement flap(BAF) and rotational palatal flap (RPF) treatment approaches.
Material and Methods: A total of 76 patients were included in this randomized controlled clinical study and were divided into two groups; Group A: treated with BFP reinforce BAF, and Group B: treated with RPF. Both procedures were performed under local anesthesia. All the patients were assessed clinically by Valsalva test at 1 week and 4 weeks post-surgicalwhere the surgical siteswere examined by direct visual examination for the amount of both epithelization and closure of the OAF.
Results: Our results showed no statistical significant difference (P>0.05) in the clinical outcomes of for both tested OAF treatments
Conclusion: Both treatment approaches are good and dependable inthe management of OAF.
Keywords
Key Words: Buccal advancement flap; Oroantral fistula; Palatal rotation flap; Buccal Fat Pad
Statistics
Article View: 288
PDF Download: 228