Automated Blood Culture versus Amplification of 16S rRNA Gene Method for Detection of Neonatal Septicemia

Desouky, Somaya M.; Abd ElGlil, Reem; Abd Almonaem, Eman R.; Abdelmoneim, Eman Salah; AL-Tabbakh, AL-Shaimaa M.

doi:10.21608/ejmm.2021.197453

	Automated Blood Culture versus Amplification of 16S rRNA Gene Method for Detection of Neonatal Septicemia
Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Article 6, Volume 30, Issue 4, October 2021, Page 39-45 PDF (363.68 K)
Document Type: New and original researches in the field of Microbiology.
DOI: 10.21608/ejmm.2021.197453
View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Somaya M. Desouky¹; Reem Abd ElGlil¹; Eman R. Abd Almonaem²; Eman Salah Abdelmoneim ³; AL-Shaimaa M. AL-Tabbakh¹
¹Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
²Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
³Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
Abstract
*Background: Accurate and rapid diagnosis of neonatal septicemia is highly warranted because of high associated morbidity and mortality. Blood culture serves as a routine method for diagnosis of bacterial sepsis. However, it sometimes takes ≥ 72 hours for the results, with low sensitivity. Full automated blood culture method is superior to conventional methods in terms of speed and sensitivity. The polymerase chain reaction–based detection of 16S rRNA has reduced the laboratory turnaround time and has good sensitivity. Objectives:* The aim of this study was to compare automated blood culture and amplification of 16srRNA gene by PCR in detection of aerobic bacterial infection in blood samples of hospitalized neonates with suspected neonatal sepsis and to determine the most common types of bacteria causing neonatal sepsis. Methodology: Blood samples collected from 40 neonates clinically suspected as neonatal sepsis were subjected to bacterial identification through automated blood culture by BacT/ALERT PF Plus Culture Bottles, and bacterial detection of 16S rRNA gene by PCR. Results: Out of 40 neonatal blood samples with suspected sepsis, 37(92.5%) neonates showed concordance between automated blood culture and PCR; 17(42.5%) showed positive results while 20 (50%) gave negative results by both methods. The remaining 3 cases (7.5%) were positive only by PCR. PCR sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 86.9%, 85% and 100% respectively. So, accuracy of PCR in relation to automated blood culture is 92.5%. The most common pathogens in cases of early onset neonatal sepsis were Klebsiella pneumoniae (7/15, 46.7%) followed by Streptococcus agalactiae (1/15, 6.6%) while the most common pathogens found in cases of late onset neonatal sepsis were Klebsiella pneumoniae and coagulase negative staphylococci (4/25,16% for each) then Staphylococcus aureus (1/25, 4%). Conclusion: 16S rRNA PCR showed accurate rapid diagnosis with higher sensitivity in diagnosis of neonatal septicemia. Klebsiella peumoniae was the main causative bacteria in early onset neonatal sepsis and late onset neonatal sepsis.
Keywords
Neonatal sepsis; 16S rRNA; automated blood culture; EONS; LONS


Statistics Article View: 388 PDF Download: 297