Clinical and Radiographical evaluation of fiberglass crown and stainless steel crown in primary molars. | ||||
Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science | ||||
Article 4, Volume 24, Issue 4, October 2021, Page 457-462 PDF (439.42 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2021.66875.1184 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
amgad mostafa mostafa 1; Alaa eldeen Abdallah Mohamed2; mohamed Galal Ibrahim3; Alaa Nabil Abbas3 | ||||
1B.D.S. (2012G), Faculty of Dental Medicine, boys, Cairo, Al-Azhar University, Dentist, Egyptian Ministry of Health. | ||||
22 Associate Professor, Pedodontics and Oral Health Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo, AL-Azhar University | ||||
3Lecturer of Pedodontics and Oral Health, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo, Al Azhar University | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Purpose: Evaluate fiberglass and stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars (clinical and radiograph) Subjects and methods: Forty molars teeth indicated for crown restoration. Patients were selected from the outpatient Clinic of the Department of Pedodontics and Oral Health, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University. Bilateral crowns to first or second primary molars, one side was restored by stainless steel crowns (group A), and the other side was restored by fiberglass crowns (group B). Teeth were randomly assigned to Figaro or PMC crown groups. Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used to evaluate recurrent caries marginal integration crown retention and gingival status at48 hrs. 3 and 6 months. Results: After six months of follow-up, the Fiberglass crown showed a significant difference in crown retention than the stainless-steel crowns (SSCs). Associated with recurrent caries and gingival inflammation. Conclusions: Stainless steel crowns continue to be the restoration of choice for compromised primary molar teeth despite unpleasant esthetics. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
fiberglass crown; stainless steel crown; crown retention | ||||
Statistics Article View: 414 PDF Download: 684 |
||||