The Different Effects of the Dynamic Population on Agricultural Productivity as a Comparison among Less and More Developed Countries
El-Ghannam, A. (2021). The Different Effects of the Dynamic Population on Agricultural Productivity as a Comparison among Less and More Developed Countries. EKB Journal Management System, 4(12), 47-74. doi: 10.21608/asajs.2021.198670
Ashraf Ragab El-Ghannam. "The Different Effects of the Dynamic Population on Agricultural Productivity as a Comparison among Less and More Developed Countries". EKB Journal Management System, 4, 12, 2021, 47-74. doi: 10.21608/asajs.2021.198670
El-Ghannam, A. (2021). 'The Different Effects of the Dynamic Population on Agricultural Productivity as a Comparison among Less and More Developed Countries', EKB Journal Management System, 4(12), pp. 47-74. doi: 10.21608/asajs.2021.198670
El-Ghannam, A. The Different Effects of the Dynamic Population on Agricultural Productivity as a Comparison among Less and More Developed Countries. EKB Journal Management System, 2021; 4(12): 47-74. doi: 10.21608/asajs.2021.198670

The Different Effects of the Dynamic Population on Agricultural Productivity as a Comparison among Less and More Developed Countries

المجلة العربية للعلوم الزراعية
Article 3, Volume 4, Issue 12, October 2021, Page 47-74  XML PDF (1.05 MB)
Document Type: المقالة الأصلية
DOI: 10.21608/asajs.2021.198670
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Ashraf Ragab El-Ghannam
Professor at Dept. of Rural Sociology Research, Agricultural Extension & Rural Development Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to identify and explain the different between population dynamic and agricultural productivity in LDC’s and MDC’s; as well as to investigate the relationships between population dynamic and agricultural productivity in LDC’s and MDC’s. The sample was involved 109 countries. According to the Human Development Report (2019), 58 of these countries are considering as LDC’s, while others 51 are considering as MDC’s. Means, standard deviation, T test, and Spearman correlation coefficients used as statistical techniques. Results of T test indicate a different statistically significant between LDC’s and MDC’s for the all dependent and independent variables, except the total population variable.
The results of Spearman's correlation coefficients showed that the highest index of crop production is likely to occur among LDC’s that have a high population growth rate and more dependency ratio, while it occurs among MDC’s with the highest percentage of the population age composition (0-14). Furthermore, the results suggest that the highest food production index are more likely to occur among MDC’s that have the more growth rate of population, more growth rates of urban population, highest rate of net migration, lowest dependency ratio, highest percent of population age composition (0-14 and 15-64), and lowest percent of population age composition (65+), while it occurs among LDC’s with the high population growth rate. Moreover, the results suggest that the highest livestock production index are more likely to occur among MDC’s that have the highest growth rate of population, highest growth rate of urban population, highest rate of net migration, less dependency ratio, highest percent of population age composition (15-64), and lowest percent of population age composition (65+).
 
Keywords
Dynamic Population; Agricultural Productivity; Agricultural Development; Development; Comparative Studies
References
  1. Alexandratos, N. & Bruinsma, J. 2012. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision.ESA Working Paper No. 12–03. Rome, FAO.
  2. Alston, J. 2010. The benefits from agricultural research and development, innovation, and productivity growth. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers No. 31. Paris, OECD Publishing.
  3. Anriquez, G. & Stloukal, L. 2008. Rural population change in developing countries: Lessons for policy making. ESA Working Papers No. 08–09. Rome, FAO.
  4. Binswanger–Mkhize, H.P. 2012. India 1960–2010: Structural change, the rural nonfarm sector, and the prospects for agriculture. Seminar paper presented at University of California, Berkeley, USA.
  5. Boserup, Ester (1965), The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure, Chicago: Aldine.
  6. Christiaensen, L. & Todo, Y. 2013. Poverty reduction during the rural-urban transformation: The role of the missing middle. Policy Research Working Paper Series 644. Washington, DC, World Bank.
  7. Dorosh, P. & Thurlow, J. 2014. Can cities drive African development? Economy wide analysis for Ethiopia and Uganda. World Development, 63: 113–123.
  8. Cohen, M. & Garrett, J. 2009. The food price crisis and urban food insecurity. London, IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development).
  9. Fairfield-Sonn, J.W. 2016. Political economy of GMO foods. Journal of Management Policy and Practice,17(1): 60.
  10. FAO. 2011b. The State of Food and Agriculture 2010–11. Women in agriculture: closing the gender gap for development. Rome.
  11. FAO. 2012. The State of Food and Agriculture 2012. Investment in agriculture for a better future. Rome.
  12. FAO. 2014. The State of Food and Agriculture 2014. Innovation in family farming. Rome.
  13. FAO. 2016a. FAOSTAT [Website] (available at http://faostat.fao.org). Accessed November 2016.
  14. FAO. 2016c. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome.
  15. FAO, 2018, Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site.
  16. FAO, IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development) & WFP (World Food Program). 2015. Achieving Zero Hunger. The critical role of investment in social protection and agriculture. Rome, FAO.
  17. Food and Agriculture Organization (2018), Food and Agriculture Organization Database, Electronic files and web site http://www.fao.org/ World /en/ July 2019.
  18. The Human Development Report (2019), The Human Development Index (HDI), Statistical Update ranks, United Nations Development Program.
  19. IOM (International Organization for Migration), 2013, Migration and the United Nations post-2015 development agenda, Geneva.
  20. Malthus, T., 1963, An Essay on the Principle of Population, Homewood: R.D. Irwin.
  21. Slavchevska, V., Kaaria, S. & Taivalmaa, S.L., 2016, Feminization of Agriculture in the Context of Rural Transformations: What is the Evidence? Working paper, July 2016, Washington, DC, World Bank.
  22. Southgate, D., 2009, Population growth, Increase in agricultural production, and trends in food prices, The electronic journal of sustainable development, Vol. 1, Issue 3, Pp: 29-35. 
  23. Southgate, D. and D. Graham, 2007, The World Food Economy, Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
  24. Spooner, B., 1972, Introduction, In B. Spooner (Ed.), Population Growth: Anthropological Implications, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  25. UN. 2011. Youth and Migration. Youth Issue Briefs 2016. New York, USA, UN-DESA.
  26. United Nation, 2015, Trends in International Migration, 2015. Population Facts, No. 2015/4, December 2015. New York, USA, UN-DESA.
  27. United Nations, 2016. National accounts data (available at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/ nationalaccount/ data.asp), Accessed 9 February 2016.
  28. United Nations, 2016. The System of National Accounts (SNA) [Website] (available at http://unstats. un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/sna.asp). Accessed February 2016.
  29. United Nation (UN), 2011. Youth and Migration. Youth Issue Briefs 2016. NY, USA, UN-DESA.
  30. United Nations: Population Division (2019), World Population Prospects: 2019 Revision, NY, USA.
  31. United Nations: Statistical Division (2019), Population and Vital Statistics Report, NY, USA.
  32. United State Census Bureau (2018), International Database, Statistics and Demography Program, The National Data Book, Economic and Statistics Administration, Washington, D‎C.
  33. World Bank, 2008, World Development Indicators Online (http://ddp-ext.worldbank.org/ ext/ DDPQQ), accessed via Ohio State University Library System, 17 July.
  34. World Bank. 2012. World Development Indicators 2012. Washington, DC.
  35. World Bank, 2014, Report on the remittance agenda of the G20, Prepared by the World Bank for the G20 Australian Presidency, Washington DC.
  36. World Bank, 2018, United State Census Bureau, Online Data Base.
  37. World Bank (2019), Staff estimates based on age distributions of United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects: 2019 Revision.
  38. World Development Indicators (2019), World Development Indicators Database, Washington, DC., October, http://data.worldbank.org.
Statistics
Article View: 348
PDF Download: 156