Bond failure rate of computer aided versus traditional bracket placement for indirect bonding technique: In vivo study
Hesham fathy Boghdady, A., Hammad, S., mohammad Hafez, A. (2020). Bond failure rate of computer aided versus traditional bracket placement for indirect bonding technique: In vivo study. EKB Journal Management System, 7(3), 56-62. doi: 10.21608/mjd.2020.198740
Amira Hesham fathy Boghdady; Shaza Hammad; Ahmad mohammad Hafez. "Bond failure rate of computer aided versus traditional bracket placement for indirect bonding technique: In vivo study". EKB Journal Management System, 7, 3, 2020, 56-62. doi: 10.21608/mjd.2020.198740
Hesham fathy Boghdady, A., Hammad, S., mohammad Hafez, A. (2020). 'Bond failure rate of computer aided versus traditional bracket placement for indirect bonding technique: In vivo study', EKB Journal Management System, 7(3), pp. 56-62. doi: 10.21608/mjd.2020.198740
Hesham fathy Boghdady, A., Hammad, S., mohammad Hafez, A. Bond failure rate of computer aided versus traditional bracket placement for indirect bonding technique: In vivo study. EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 7(3): 56-62. doi: 10.21608/mjd.2020.198740

Bond failure rate of computer aided versus traditional bracket placement for indirect bonding technique: In vivo study

Mansoura Journal of Dentistry
Article 12, Volume 7, Issue 3, September 2020, Page 56-62  XML PDF (312.24 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/mjd.2020.198740
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Amira Hesham fathy Boghdady1; Shaza Hammad2; Ahmad mohammad Hafez3
1BDS, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University (2013)Clinical demonstrator, Department of Orthodontics, Kafr EL Shikh University
2Professor of OrthodonticsHead of Orthodontics DepartmentFaculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
3Assistant Professor of Orthodontics OrthodonticsDepartmentFaculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Abstract
Objective: To compare bond failure rates between traditional (Method I) and computer aided (Method II) indirect techniques for bonding orthodontic brackets.
Design: prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with split mouth design.
Materials and methods: fifteen subjects meeting the inclusion criteria were selected from orthodontic waiting lists and assigned to either of two study groups according to a split-mouth study design. The number of bracket failures with each group was recorded during the procedure, after first wire insertion and over a period of three months.
Results: seventeen brackets were lost from the 300 bonded teeth, giving an overall bond failure rate of (5.7%). There were 9 initial failures; 4 brackets of method I (2.7%) and 5 brackets of method II (3.3%). At 3-months follow up, 8 additional failures occurred; 6/146 in method I (4.1%) and 2/145 in method II (1.4%). There were no statistically significant differences in either the initial or the overall bond failure rates between the two methods.
Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the overall bond failure rates between digital (computer aided) and manual (traditional) indirect bonding techniques.
 
Statistics
Article View: 169
PDF Download: 219