Antioxidant and Cytotoxicity Potential of Piperine and Sorafenib combination in human MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer cells | ||||
Biochemistry Letters | ||||
Article 10, Volume 17, Issue 1, 2021, Page 108-116 PDF (567.18 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/blj.2021.200558 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Hany Mohany1; Mohammad A. Mahmoud1; Ashraf A. El-Shehawy1; Mohamed Gaber2; Alaa Elmetwalli 3; Afrah F. Salama4; Tarek El Sewedy5 | ||||
1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Kafr el sheikh University. | ||||
2Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University | ||||
3Department of Clinical Trial Research Unit and Drug Discovery, Egyptian Liver Research Institute and Hospital (ELRIAH), Mansoura, Egypt. | ||||
4Biochemistry Section, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University. | ||||
5Department of Applied Medical Chemistry, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women. Worldwide, it is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality among women. Plants have been the primary sources of natural product drug discovery, over 60% of the current anticancer drugs were derived from natural sources. Piperine (PIP) is a major bioactive constituent of the black pepper (Piper nigrum). Aim: We have assessed the cytotoxicity of PIP and the anti-hepatocellular carcinoma drug Sorafenib (SOR) against human triple negative breast cancer MDA-MB-321 cell line. Furthermore, we have investigated the potential effect of single and their combined treatment on antioxidant enzyme activity and lipid peroxidation status. Methods: We measured cytotoxicity of PIP and SOR in MDA-MB-321 cells by MTT assay after 48 hours treatment. Activity of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and the lipid peroxidation marker Malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured colorimetrically. Results: Both PIP and SOR caused a significant (P<0.001) dose dependent cell death in MDA-MB-321 cells. However, SOR showed higher cytotoxicity (IC90= 144.8 ± 5.1µg/ml) compared to PIP (IC90= 252.4 ± 6.7µg/ml). Consistent with these data, SOR individual treatment caused the highest significant SOD and CAT activities while their combined treatment caused the lowest MDA levels (4.2 ± 0.2 nmol/ml) compared with the control untreated (7.7 ± 0.2 nmol/ml) or DMSO treated cells (7.76 ± 0.25 nmol/ml). Conclusion: This study points out a potential mode of action for PIP and SOR as anticancer agents in triple negative breast cancer cells through the regulation of their antioxidant and lipid peroxidation status. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Piperine; sorafenib; lipid peroxidation; antioxidants; breast cancer | ||||
Statistics Article View: 462 PDF Download: 277 |
||||