Comparison Between Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap and Free Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap in Reconstruction of Post Traumatic Soft Tissue Defects of the Dorsum of the Foot | ||||
| The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | ||||
| Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 04 November 2021 | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.92809.1107 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
waleed metwally  1; Tarek A Abulezz2; amr elsayed ali3; gamal youssef elsayed1
| ||||
| 1plastic and reconstructive surgery department, faculty of medicine, sohag university. | ||||
| 2Plastic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt | ||||
| 3Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Unit; Assiut University Hospital; Assiut; Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Abstract Background: The objective of this study is to compare between the free anterolateral thigh flap and free medial sural artery perforator flap in reconstruction of post traumatic soft tissue defects of dorsum of the foot as regard the function, the aesthetic outcome, the complications and the patient satisfaction. Method: The study was conducted on 40 patients with post traumatic soft tissue defects of the dorsum of the foot between August 2018 and August 2019. Patients were allocated randomly into two groups. In group1 (20 patients), the defect was reconstructed with free anterolateral thigh perforator flap. In group 2 (20 patients), reconstruction was done by free medial sural artery perforator flap. Result: In group 1 (ALT flap), Complete flap survival was achieved in all cases. Thirteen patients required secondary debulking procedures and scar revisions. In group 2 (MSAP Flap), Complete flap survival was achieved in 17 cases with one flap totally lost and two flaps had distal necrosis. One patient needed scar revision and another patient needed flap advancement. Conclusion: MSAP flap is good alternative in soft tissue reconstruction of the dorsum of the foot. It has many advantages: it is thin, pliable, fitted to normal footwear, less hairy and there is no need for secondary procedures in most cases. ALT flap is better than MSAP flap in larger defects coverage but may need secondary debulking procedures or primary thinning at the time of reconstruction. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Anterolateral thigh flap; Medial sural artery perforator flap; Foot Reconstruction; Ankle Reconstruction Dorsum of the foot; Microsurgery | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 135 |
||||
