The Effect of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies on Developing Working Memory and Achievement Goal Orientation among High School Students . | ||||
| المجلة المصرية للدراسات النفسية | ||||
| Article 14, Volume 31, Issue 113, October 2021, Page 1-18 PDF (611.97 K) | ||||
| Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejcj.2021.206030 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Adel M. ElAdl1; Mimi El-Sayed A. Ismail2 | ||||
| 1professor of Educational Psychology – Zagazig University, Egypt& Sultan Qaboos University, Oman | ||||
| 2professor of Educational Psychology – Zagazig University, Egypt& Sultan Qaboos University, Oman Assistant professor of Educational Psychology – Zagazig University, Egypt& Technology and Applied Science University- Oman | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| This study aims to investigate the effect of a self-regulated learning strategies on developing working memory and achievement goal orientation among high school students. The sample was selected from high school students. The participants in this study were 76 students. Experimental group (EG) consisted of 38 students while the control group (CG) consisted of 38 students. An experimental pretest and posttest control-group design was used in this study. The self-regulated learning strategies was conducted to the whole class by their actual teacher during the actual lesson period for 12 weeks with 50 minute sessions conducted three times a week. The program was designed based on the three basic fundamentals of self-regulated learning strategies, namely ‘cognitive, metacognitive and resource management strategies’. The results of this study indicated great gains for students in the experimental group in among working memory and achievement goal orientation. The study shows that students in the experimental group, compared to those in the control group, develop robust among working memory and achievement goal orientation. Recommendation: As self-regulated learning strategies exhibit a substantial effect on students’ among working memory and achievement goal orientation, it is recommended that teachers should learn how to implement these strategies in their lessons to increase their students’ performance. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Self-Regulated Learning Strategies; Working Memory; Achievement Goal Orientation | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Alivernini, F., Manganelli, S. & Lucidi, F. (2018). Personal and Classroom Achievement Goals: TheirStructures and Relationships. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(4) 354–365. doi:10.1177/0734282916679758
Anderman E M, Griesinger T, Westerfield G, (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90: 1–9.
Andrade, J. (2001). Working memory in perspective. UK: Psychology Press: Hove.
Arnott, S.R.; Grady, C.L.; Hevenor, S.J.; Graham, S.& Alain, C. (2005). The functional organization of auditory working memory as revealed by fMRI. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 17, 819–831
Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory. Curr. Biol., 20, 136–140.
Duman, B. (2010). The effects of brain-based learning on the academic achievement of students with different learning styles. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(4), 2077- 2103.
Elliot A J, McGregor H A, (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(3): 501-519. doi:10.1037///0022-3514.80.3.501
Greene B A, Miller R B, (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement, Contemporary Educational Psychology 21(2): 181-192. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0015
Gunderson, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Robins, R. W. & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2018). The specificity of parenting effects: Differential relations of parent praise and criticism to children’s theories of intelligence and learning goals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,173, 116–135. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.015.
Jaber Abdel Hamid ,J. (2005). Differentiating and constructive classroom . Cairo , Aalam Al Kotub.
Jagacinski C M, Duda J L,( 2001). A comparative analysis of contemporary achievement goal orientation measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement 61: 1013-1039. doi:10.1177/00131640121971626
Kaplan A, Maehr M L, (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review 19(2): 141–184. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5.
Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci., 14, 317–324.
Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment (3rded.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, A. L. & Neumeister, K. L. S. (2017). The Influence of Personality, Parenting Styles, and Perfectionism on Performance Goal Orientation in High Ability Students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(4) 313–344. doi: 10.1177/1932202X17730567.
Miyake, A.& Shah, P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. UK, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Mourad Ali ,E.(2006). Computer and Learning Difficulties: Theory and Practice, Alexandria, Dar Al Wafaa
Ozden, Muhammet(2008). The Effects of Brain-Based Learning on Academic Achievement and Retention of Knowledge in Science Course. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 3-19.
Pashler, H.; McDaniel, M.; Rohrer, D.& Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest, 9, 105–119.
Perry, N. (2002). Introduction: Using qualitative methods to enrich understandings of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 1-3.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Research, 31 459-470.
Pintrich P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 92-104.
Pintrich, P. & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum
Raven, J. C., Court, J.H. & Raven, J.C. (1993). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales – Section 1: General Overview. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Ryan, A. M. (2006). Social achievement goals: The nature and consequences of different orientations toward social competence. Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1246-1263.
Ryan, A.M., Pintrich, P. R. & Midgley, C. (2001). An exploration of young adolescents' social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 672-687.
Safa E., Nadia S.& Azza K. (2005). The mind and its magical trees. Cairo, Arab Thought House.
Schunk, D. (1996). Learning goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writting achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337-354
Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich .Educational Psychologist, 40 (2), 85-94.
Schunk, D. & Zimmerman, B. (1995). Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational aplications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Seginer, R. & Mahajna, S. (2018). Future orientation links perceived parenting and academic achievement: Gender differences among Muslim adolescents in Israel. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 197–208. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.009.
Vogel, E.K.; Machizawa, M.G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748.
Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence Scale. 3rd Edition, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Reflections on theories of selfregulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmermann & D. H. Schunk (Hrsg.), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement (S. 289– 307). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 230 PDF Download: 216 |
||||
