MODIFICATION OF MICROCLIMATE CONDITIONS FOR IMPROVING TOMATO PLANT GROWTH COMPONENTS AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 8, Volume 39, Issue 1, January 2022, Page 119-132 PDF (1011.88 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2021.106108.1053 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Wafaa M. A. Abd El-Bary  1; Mahmoud M. Hegazi2; Khaled F. El-Bagoury2; Wael M. Sultan3; Manal M. Mubarak4
| ||||
| 1Ph.D. Student, Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Ain Shams U., Egypt. | ||||
| 2Prof. of Ag. Eng., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Ain Shams U., Egypt. | ||||
| 3Head of Res., Field Irrigation Eng. Dept., Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Egypt. | ||||
| 4Prof. of Soil Science, Soil and Water Science Dept., Fac. of Ag., Ain Shams U., Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Climate change is one of humanity's most pressing problems. So, the aim of study was to improve tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Elisa) healthy unit area productivity (Quality and Quantity) under surface and sub-surface drip irrigation systems. Field experiment was conducted within the time of Dec. 2019 to May 2020, in the Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University in Shoubra El Kheima, Kalyubia Governorate, Egypt. Experimental farm is located at (latitude 30°, 12'N and longitude 31°, 24'E; mean altitude, 26 m above sea level). The experimental design was a split plot design with three replicates comprising two irrigation systems [surface drip irrigation (T1) and sub-surface drip irrigation (T2)] in main plots involving drip irrigation [built-in dripper, normal flow rates were 8 l/h/m (dripper spacing 0.5m)]. Tunnel heights 75 cm, three plastic tunnels of low thicknesses [40 micron (P1), 50 micron (P2) and 60 micron (P3)] in subplots. Data analysis revealed under surface and sub-surface drip irrigation at was treatment plastic thickness 60 micron at a plant height of 135.6 cm and 141.5 cm. Plant stem diameter under surface and sub-surface drip irrigation 33.8 mm and 34.5 mm, it increased by 10.4% and 11.6% more than control with mulching. Yield was 22.94 ton/fed and 24.45 ton/fed under surface and sub-surface drip irrigation increase ratio 54.1% and 45.8% more than control with mulching. Water use efficiency was 16.46 kg/m3 and 20.38 kg/m3 under surface and sub-surface drip irrigation increase ratio 58.1% and 55.5% more than control with mulching. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Drip irrigation; Mulching; Plant height; Plant stem diameter; Yield | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D. and Smith, M., (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. FAO, Rome, Italy, 300 p.
American Society of Agric. Eng. (ASAE), (1996). Field evaluation of micro irrigation systems. EP405. ASAE.
Anderson, H. C.; Rogers M.A.; and Hoover, E.E., (2019). Low tunnel covering and microclimate, fruit yield, and quality in an organic strawberry production system. Hort-technology, 1(aop), 1-9.
Arin, L., and Ankara, S., (2001). Effect of low-tunnel, mulch and pruning on the yield and earliness of tomato in unheated glasshouse. J. Appl. Hort, 3(1), 23-27.
Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate (CLAC), (2019, 2020). Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Chaugule, A. A.; Gutal, G. B. and Kulkarni, P. V., (1990). The feasibility of plastic polyhouse for capsicum crop. Proc. International Agricultural Engineering Conference and Eexhibition. Pp. 1485-89, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chernet S.; Belew D., and Abay F., (2014). Performance evaluation and path analysis studies in tomato genotypes under Humera, Northern Ethiopia condition. World J. Agric. Res., 2(6): 267-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/wjar-2-6-3.
Dam, B. V.; Goffau, M. D.; de Jeude, L., and Naika, S., (2005). Cultivation of tomato: Production, processing and marketing. Agrodok; 17. Agromisa/CTA, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Jensen, M. H., (1983). Controlled environment agriculture in deserts tropics and temperate regions – A world review. Acta Hort. 578: 19–25.
Jensen, R.W., (1982). Equivalent hydraulic pipe for parallel pipes. J. Hydraulic Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 108: 35-45.
Keller J. and Karmeli, D., (1974). Trickle dripper irrigation design parameters. Trans. of ASAE, 17(4): 678-684.
Kumar, A.; Tyagi, S.; and Kumar, N., (2017). Protected Cultivation of Vegetable Crops. Agrodok; 17. Agromisa/CTA, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Kwambe, X.M.; Masarirambi, M.T.; Wahome, P.K. and Oseni, T.O., (2015). The effects of organic and inorganic mulches on growth and yield of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in a semiarid environment. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 6 (3), 81-89.
Lodhi, A. S.; Kaushal, A., and Singh, K. G., (2013). Effect of irrigation regimes and low tunnel heights on microclimatic parameters in the growing of sweet pepper. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent, 2(7), 20-29.
Ngouajioa, M.; Wanga G. and Goldyb, R., (2007). Withholding of drip irrigation between transplanting and flowering increases the yield of field-grown tomato under plastic mulch. Agric. Water Management. 87: 285-291.
Palada, M.C.; A.M. Davis; J.A. Kowalski; S.M.A. Crossman, (2003). Yield and irrigation water use of vegetables grown with plastic and straw mulch in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Int. Water & Irrig. 23:21-25.
Rai, P. and Dinmani, (2018). Off season bottle gourd cultivation using plastic mulch and low tunnel. HortFlora Res. Spectrum, 7(1): 19-23
Sindhu, V., and Chatterjee, R., (2019). Off-Season vegetable cultivation under protected structures: a promising technology for doubling farmer’s income. Int. Arch. App. Sci. Techno; Vol. 11 [3] September 2020: 208-214.
Singh, A.; Syndor A.; Deka B.C.; Singh, R.K.; Singh, R.K. and Patel, R.K., (2012). The effect of microclimate inside low tunnels on off season production of strawberry (Frageria x Anamosa Duch.) Scientia Horticulture, 2012; 144:36-41.
Vox, G., and Schettini, E. (2013). Effects of agrochemicals, ultra violet stabilizers and solar radiation on the radiometric properties of greenhouse films. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 44(2), e11-e11. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 285 PDF Download: 281 |
||||
