Ability of Short wavelength automated perimetry to detect visual field changes in diabetic patients | ||||
SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences | ||||
Article 23, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2022, Page 210-218 PDF (365.52 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original research articles | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/svuijm.2021.89566.1205 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Mohamed Ateto Hamed 1; Ahmed Hasan Aldghaimy2; Hany Omer Elsedfy3; Ayat Yosef Mohamed2 | ||||
1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Luxor University, Luxor, Egypt | ||||
2Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt | ||||
3Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Globally, diabetes-related eye illness is the primary cause of visual impairment due to cataracts or retinopathy. The two most used visual field testing modalities in clinical practice are standard automated white-on-white (W-W) perimetry (SAP) and short wave length automated perimetry (SWAP). Objectives: To compare the value of short wave length automated perimetry SWAP (blue on yellow in contrast) to standard automated perimetry SAP in detecting changes in retinal sensitivity in diabetic individuals with or without retinopathy. Patients and methods: Forty eyes of forty patients divided into two groups, group (A) diabetic patients (20 eyes) without diabetic retinopathy and group (B) diabetic patients (20 eyes) with early diabetic retinopathy. The perimetry was done for all patients into two perimetry examination. First visit was for SAP and second visit was for SWAP. Results: In SAP, group II's MD (mean deviation) was considerably lower than group I's (P = 0.003). In SWAP, the MD in group II was considerably lower than in group I (P = 0.001). MD was substantially lower in SWAP than SAP in group I (P = 0.00009). In group II, the same results were obtained. Conclusions: In terms of distinction, the SWAP approach proved more sensitive and informative than the SAP technique. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
SWAP; SAP; VF; DM | ||||
Statistics Article View: 218 PDF Download: 182 |
||||