Foreign Trade of Wheat Crop in Egypt | ||||
| Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences | ||||
| Article 19, Volume 47, Issue 5, October 2016, Page 273-290 PDF (423.88 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ajas.2016.2114 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The most important findings and recommendations This search is talking about not keep up with domestic production of wheat crop and high increase in the national consumption of it the size and appearance of a gap between domestic production and national consumption and widening the gap year after year and that the state was forced to import increasing quantities of wheat and flour to fill this deficit This research aims to define the economic importance of foreign trade as well as identify key import wheat crop sources and identify current geographical distribution of imports of wheat in order to re-geographical distribution to reduce the value of these imports. The results showed that the total trade value of the value of total exports and total imports followed a growing trend became a time of agricultural exports and imports value increased as well and that the United States Australia and France are key countries and stable sources for the supply of wheat to Egypt. The results proved that the re-distribution of wheat imports geographically for the first alternative, and on leaving the imported wheat quantities to be distributed freely to various countries as the least expensive and we found that the quantities imported spread over three countries, namely Canada, Turkey, Kazakhstan and the second alternative regards to quit imported quantities of wheat free distribution within each group by country Lowest price and in accordance with the export of energy for these countries, and we found that the quantities imported were distributed to Canada, France, Turkey, Kazakhstan, and the third alternative regard to restricting the model to import 50% of the total amount of the France and the distribution of the rest of the quantities imported in accordance with the state of the least expensive and depending on the energy export for each country, and the rest of the quantities distributed between Turkey and Kazakhstan. Alternative fourth regard to restricting the importation model of the countries where the price per ton of no more than 2110 pounds, and in accordance with export capacity of each country. And distributed quantities imported in three countries, namely Canada, Turkey and Kazakhstan. According to the results of the study we recommend the following: 1- Reduce import of wheat flour imported a pill to take advantage of milling residues in animal feed, poultry and prevent the use of wheat in animal and poultry food. 2- Increase the total exports in general and agriculture in particular, and the targeting of high-price markets to raise export earnings and increase the coverage rate and raise the efficiency of foreign trade. 3- The use of the purchase method of long-term contracts directly with distinct states in wheat production and a stable import and be in the dates of the emergence of the crop as it is the best chance for the contract to the low price. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| wheat crop; Wheat; foreign trade; cereal crops | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 322 PDF Download: 2,387 |
||||
