NUTRIENTS CONSUMPTION OF LETTUCE PLANTS IN HYDROPONIC AND AQUAPONIC SYSTEMS | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 8, Volume 39, Issue 2, April 2022, Page 299-322 PDF (1.24 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2022.112353.1061 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Amira A. M. Amin1; Elsayed G. Khater  2; Samir A. Ali3; Salah M. Kamal4
| ||||
| 1PhD Stud., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Benha U., Egypt. | ||||
| 2Assoc. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Benha U., Egypt. | ||||
| 3Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Benha U., Egypt. | ||||
| 4Prof. and Deputy director of Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Res., Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Aquaponics is the combined culture of fish and plants in recirculating aquaculture systems, considered to be an innovative, eco-friendly and sustainable technology. So, the main aim of this work is to study the effect of flow rate and culture system on nutrients consumption rate and lettuce productivity in hydroponic and aquaponic systems. To achieve that, two nutrients sources (effluent fish farm and stock nutrient solution), three systems of hydroponics (deep water, A shape and gutter systems) and three flow rates are 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 L h-1 plant-1 were compared. Also, water use efficiency of lettuce plants was determined. The various water quality parameters and plant growth were studied for treatment under study. The obtained results indicated that the highest values of N, P, k, Ca and mg consumption rate were found with gutter hydroponic system and 1.5 L h-1 plant-1 of flow rate for lettuce plants grown in nutrient solution. The fresh weight of whole plant for lettuce plants grown in gutter hydroponic system was better than those grown in different culture system. The highest value of the water use efficiency of lettuce plants was 46.11 kg m-3 was found with nutrient solution for gutter hydroponic system. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Aquaponic; Aquaculture; Hydroponic; Fish; Lettuce plant; Nutrients; Water use efficiency | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Ali, M.M., Khater E.G., Ali S.A. and El-Haddad Z.A. (2015). Comparison between hydroponic and aeroponic systems for lettuce production. The 20th Annual Conference of Misr Soc. of Ag. Eng., 12 December 2015, 535 - 554.
Chapman, H.D. and Partt F.P. (1961). Methods of analysis of soils, plant and water. Cal. Univ., 150-200.
Delaide, B., Goddek S., Gott J., Soyeurt H and Jijaki M.H. (2016). Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Sucrine) Growth Performance in Complemented Aquaponic Solution Outperforms Hydroponics. Water, 8(10): 1-11.
Genuncio, G.C., Gomes M., Ferrari A.C., Majerowiczand N. and Zonta E. (2012). Hydroponic lettuce production in different concentrations and flow rates of nutrient solution. Horticultural Brasília, 30: 526-530.
Hu, Z., Lee J.W., Chandran K., Kim S. and Khanal S.K. (2012). Nitrous oxide (N2O) emission from aquaculture: a review. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46 (12): 6470 – 6480.
Jauncey, K. and Ross B. (1982). A guide to tilapia feeds and feeding. Institute of aquaculture, university of sterling, Scotland. 111 pp.
Khater, E.G. (2006). Aquaponics: the integration of fish and vegetable culture in recirculating systems. M. Sc. Thesis, in Agric. Eng., Fac. Agric., Moshtohor, Benha Univ., Egypt.
Khater, E.G. (2016). Effect of the ecological system on lettuce production grown under different soilless systems. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 33(4): 1595-1614.
Khater, E.G. and Ali S.A. (2015). Effect of flow rate and length of gully on lettuce plants in aquaponic and hydroponic systems. J. of Aquac. Res. and Devel., 6: 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9546.1000318
Khater, E.G., Bahnasawy A.H., Abass W., Morsy O., El-Ghobashy H.M.T., Shaban Y. and Egela M.E. (2021). Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) under different soilless cultures. Scientific Reports, 11(12754): 1-14. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91986-7
Khater, E.G., Bahnasawy A.H., Shamsa A.S., Hassaan M.S. and Hassan Y.A. (2015).Utilization of Effluent Fish Farms in Tomato Cultivation. Eco. Eng., 83: 199 - 207.
Lekang, O.I. (2007). Aquaculture Engineering. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK. p. 352.
Lennard, W.A. and Leonard B.V. (2006). A comparison of three different hydroponic subsystems (gravel bed, floating and nutrient film technique) in an aquaponic test. Syst. Aquac. Int., 14: 539 – 550.
Love, D.C., Fry J.P., Genello L., Hill E.S., Frederick J.A. Li X. and Semmens K. (2014). An international survey of aquaponics practitioners. PLoS One 9, e102662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102662.
Pulvenis, J.F. (2016). Fisheries and Aquaculture Topics. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA). Topics Fact Sheets. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome.
Rakocy, J.E. (1989). Tank culture of tilapia. In the biology and culture of tilapia, ed. R. S. V. Pullin & R. H. Lowe-McConell-ICLARM conference proceedings 7. International center for living aquatic resources management, manila, the Philippines.
Rakocy, J.E. (1999). The status of aquaponics. Part 2. Aquacult. Mag. 25, 64–70.
Rakocy, J.E. and Hargreaves J.A. (1993). Integration of vegetable hydroponics with fish culture: a review. In: Techniques for Modern Aquaculture, Proceedings Aquacultural Engineering Conference. St. Joseph, MI, USA. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. pp. 112–136.
Rakocy, J.E., Masser M.P. and Losordo T.M. (2006). Recirculating aquaculture tank production systems: aquaponics – integrating fish and plant culture. SRAC Publication No. 464.
Resh, H.M. (2012). Hydroponic Food Production: A Definitive Guidebook for the Advanced Home Gardener and the Commercial Hydroponic Grower. CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, Boca Raton, FL.
Seawright, D.E. Stickney R.R. and Walker R.B. (1998). Nutrient dynamics in integrated aquaculture-hydroponics systems. Aquaculture, 160: 215–237.
Sonneveld, C. and Voogt W. (2009). Plant Nutrition of Greenhouse Crops. Springer, Springer Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2532-6
Wongkiew, S., Hu Z., Chandran K., Lee J.W. and Khanal S.K. (2017). Nitrogen transformations in aquaponic systems: a review. Aquac. Eng., 76: 9 – 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2017.01.004. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,472 PDF Download: 640 |
||||
