أثر تباين المعالجة المحاسبية لبنود التکاليف و الايرادات في عقود المقاولات على دلالة القوائم المالية | ||||
| المجلة المصرية للدراسات التجارية | ||||
| Article 6, Volume 39, Issue 2, April 2015, Page 311-352 PDF (899.4 K) | ||||
| Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/alat.2015.213208 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| کمال عبد السلام علي حسن; مصطفى عطية الغندور; أحمد عيد محمد أبو المعاطي | ||||
| کلية التجارة - جامعة المنصورة | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| ABSTRACT Current Study aim to know the effect of contrast the accounting treatment for revenue and cost items on the usefulness of financial statements in the construction sector, and this can be achieved from studying and analyzing many problems of contrast the accounting treatment for revenue and cost items in the construction sector represented in: contrast ways of estimation inventory, contrast the ways of depreciation, estimation provisions, treatment borrowing cost, contrast allocation indirect costs, contrast the ways of revenue recognition. And studying the effect of contrast the accounting treatment for revenue and cost items on the usefulness of financial statements in the construction sector. Using a sample of 25 corporations listed on the Egyptian exchange from Real estate sector depending on discretionary accruals as Measure of financial statements usefulness, the study find many of negative effects on the financial statements usefulness in construction sector. | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Liu, L. and K. Zhu, 2007. Improving cost estimates of construction projects using phased cost factors , Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, , Vol. 133, No. 1. 3. Shane, J. S., K. R.Molenaar, S. Anderson and C.S. Dist, 2009 Construction project cost Escalation factors , Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, , Vol. 25, No. 4. Katherine Black & Jeffrey N. Barnes,2006, Revenue Recognition in the Construction Industry: An Experimental Stud”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Volume 12, Issues 1-3, pp.207-220.
Journal of corporate accounting & finance , Vol 10, No 2. 17. Lori Olsen & Thomas R. weirich, 2010, New revenue recognition model , Journal of corporate accounting and finance, vol 10, No 2, pp : 55-61. 18. Berends,T. C., (Kees) J. S., (Jack) Dhillon, 2004, An Analysis of Contract Cost Phasing on Engineering and Construction 20. PRAKASH, R., SINHA,N., 2013, Deferred Revenues and the Matching of Revenues and Expenses, Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 30 No. 2, p517. 21. Shim Jac. K. 2000, Which accounting methods for construction contracts are allowed for tax purposes?, Journal of accounting and taxation, vol 32,p 30. 22. DYLAG, Renata, & KUCHARCZYK, Malgorzata, 2011, Recognising Revenue from The Construction of Real Estate in Statements of Developers in Poland, Accounting and Management Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1, p26.Financial Ganyo Nutakor, CCE, 2007, Assessing Final Cost of Construction at Bid Time, Cost Engineering Vol. 49, No. 11, pp 10. 31. Maples, L., 2003, Taxpayers Using the percentage of completion method to account for long term contracts may not exclude retain ages payable when calculating their contract costs incurred, Practical tax Stratigies, p 97. Koch industries, INC. Decision, Construction Accounting & Taxation, Vol 21, No 1, p 43. 33. ALICE WOOLLEY, 2005, Evaluating value: a historical case study of the capacity of alternative billing methods to reform unethical hourly billing, VOL. 12, NO. 3, pp 340. 32. Hagan, Joseph M., Bailey, Rose L., 2011, The use of percentage of completion method of accounting : The
Projects, The Engineering Economist, vol 49, p 327.
16. Elaine Henry and Oscar j. Holzmann, 2009,Contract based revenue recognition,
International Financial Reporting, 2014, No. 15, Revenue From Contracts With Customers. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 188 PDF Download: 165 |
||||
