Utilization of geophysical and sedimentological studies in the estimation of the subgrade soil in Buraydah City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia | ||||
| Al-Azhar Bulletin of Science | ||||
| Article 12, Volume 33, Issue 1-D, June 2022, Page 143-161 PDF (2.06 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/absb.2022.104424.1151 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Osama El Shafaey  1; Ahmed Saad2; Sherif ElKholey3
| ||||
| 1Saden For Engineering Company, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Civil Department, Faculty of Engineering, Al Qassim University, Al Qassim Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| With the continuous increase in population and economic and vital activities in Saudi Arabia and the entire world, there has become a significant increase in the construction activities. So, an appropriate investigation was carried out to assess the geotechnical parameters to verify the suitability of Buraydah area for the urban extension using shallow seismic refraction technique and sedimentological studies. For this purpose, fifteen seismic refraction spread and fifty nine sediment samples conducted in the study area. The sedimentological study includes; grain size analysis, to evaluate the textural parameters and statistical measurements to describe the depositional pattern of the studied sediments in the area. The statistical parameters include; graphic mean size varying from (-1.7ϕ) to (0.44ϕ), the sorting (σI) ranges from (1.3ϕ) to (2.2ϕ), the skewness (Sk) ranges from (-0.08ϕ) to (0.97ϕ), and the kurtosis (Kg) ranges between (0.57ϕ) to (2.2ϕ). In addition, this study was supported by microscopic analysis. Thefoundation material indices of shallow seismic refraction technique show that thecalculated values of Poisson’s ratio that founding within all layers throughout the study area is (0.24), the calculated material index values is (0.05) andthe estimated concentration index values is (5.2). The ultimate bearing capacity values of the surface layer where the values are ranged between 0.09 Kg/cm2 and 136 Kg/cm2, the second layer ranged from 2.87 Kg/cm2to 185 and the third layer values are ranged between 1.9 Kg/cm2 and 185 Kg/cm2. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Textural parameters; Ultimate bearing capacity; Shallow seismic refraction; Material indices; Mesokurtic and Primary wave | ||||
| References | ||||
|
[1] Atif Elzein E. Geological and geotechnichal characterization of Paleozoic rocks and Cenozoic soil deposits around Buraydah Twon, Qasseem Region, KSA. UOFK;
[2] Pipan M, Forte E, Dal Moro G, Gabrielli P. Integrated seismic and GPR characterization of fractured rocks. In: Workshop on Hydrogeophysics – A Tool for Sustainable Use of Groundwater 2005, Palermo, Italy (2005)
[3] Tokeshi K, Harutoonian P, Leo CJ, Liyanapathirana S. Use of surface waves for geotechnical engineering applications in Western Sydney. Adv Geosci (2013); 35: 37–44 doi:10.5194/adgeo-35-37-2013
[4] Khalifa MA. Lithostratigraphic classification and depositional history of the Permian rocks in Al Qasim Province, Saudi Arabia. J African Earth Sci (and Middle East). 1993;16(3):329–40.
[5] Albusoda BS, Salem LA, Salem K. Stabilization of dune sand by using cement kiln dust (CKD). J Earth Sci Geotech Eng. 2012;2(1):131–43.
[6] Al Fouzan F, Dafalla MA. Study of cracks and fissures phenomenon in Central Saudi Arabia by applying geotechnical and geophysical techniques. Arab J Geosci. 2014;7(3):1157–64.
[7] Le Hérissé A, Molyneux SG, Miller MA. Late Ordovician to early Silurian acritarchs from the Qusaiba-1 shallow core hole, central Saudi Arabia. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2015;212:22–59.
[8] Benaafi M, Abdullatif O. Sedimentological, mineralogical, and geochemical characterization of sand dunes in Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci. 2015;8(12):11073–92.
[9] Alhumimidi MS, Harbi HM, Alfarhan MS, Abdelrahman K, Aiken CL V. Imaging fracture distributions of the Al-Khuff Formation outcrops using GPR and ERT geophysical techniques, Al-Qassim area, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci. 2017;10(14):1–11.
[10.]Steineke M, Bramkamp RA, Sander NJ. Stratigraphic relations of Arabian Jurassic oil: Middle East. 1958;
[11] Powers RW, Ramirez LF, Redmond CD, Elberg EL. Geology of the Arabian Peninsula:. United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey; 1966.
[12]Laboun AA. Regional tectonic and megadepositional cycles of the Paleozoic of northwestern and central Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci. 2013;6(4):971–84.
[13] Williams PL, Vaslet D, Johnson PR, Berthiaux A, Le Strat P, Fourniguet J. Geologic map of the Jabal Habashi quadrangle, sheet 26F. Kingdom Saudi Arab Saudi Arab Deputy Minist Miner Resour Geosci Map GM-98A (with text). 1986;
[14.]Delfour J, Dhellemmes R, Elsass P, Vaslet D, Brosse JM, Le Nindre YM, Dottin O. Explanatory notes to the geologic map of the Ad Dawadimi Quadrangle, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Geoscience Map GM-60C, scale 1:250,000, sheet 24G. Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources, Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 1982; 36 p.
[15] Folk RL, Ward WC. Brazos River bar [Texas]; a study in the significance of grain size parameters. J Sediment Res. 1957;27(1):3–26.
[16] Blott SJ, Pye K. GRADISTAT: a grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments. Earth Surf. Proc. Landf. (2001) 26: 1237-1248.
[17] Wentworth CK. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol. (1922) 30 (5): 377-392.
[18] Boggs Jr S, Boggs S. Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Cambridge university press; 2009.
[19] Friedman GM. Dynamic processes and statistical parameters compared for size frequency distribution of beach and river sands. J Sediment Res. 1967;37(2):327–54.
[20] Moiola RJ, Weiser D. Textural parameters; an evaluation. J Sediment Res. 1968;38(1):45–53.
[21] Grant FS, West GF. Interpretation theory in applied geophysics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1965.
[22] Sheriff RE, Geldart LP. Exploration seismology. Cambridge university press; 1995.
[23] Gardner LW. An areal plan of mapping subsurface structure by refraction shooting. Geophysics. 1939;4(4):247–59.
[24] Press F. Determination of crustal structure from phase velocity of Rayleigh waves part I: southern California. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1956;67(12):1647–58.
[25] Dobrin MB, Savit CH. Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting Mc Graw-Hill Book Co. New York (867 pp). 1988;
[26] Bowles JE. Foundation analysis and design. 1988.
[27] Birch F. Compressibility; elastic constants. Handb Phys constants. 1966;97–173.
[28] Gassman F. Seismische Prospektion. Birkhaeuser Verlag, Stuttgart, p. 417; 1973
[29] Tatham RH. V p/V s and lithology. Geophysics. 1982;47(3):336–44.
[30] Abd El-Rahman M. The potential of absorption coefficient and seismic quality factor in delineating less sound foundation materials in Jabal Shib Az Sahara area, Northwest of Sanaa, Yemen Arab Republic. Egypt, MERC Earth Sci. 1991;5:181–7.
[31] Parry RHG. Estimating bearing capacity in sand from SPT values. J Geotech Eng Div. 1977;103(9):1014–9.
[32] Imai T, Fumoto H, Yokota K. The relation of mechanical properties of soil to P-and S-wave velocities in Japan. In: Proceedings of 4th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Tokyo, Japan. 1975. p. 89–96.
[33] Stümpel H, Kähler S, Meissner R, Milkereit B. The use of seismic shear waves and compressional waves for lithological problems of shallow sediments. Geophys Prospect. 1984;32(4):662–75.
[34] Hanna A, El-Rahman MA. Ultimate bearing capacity of triangular shell strip footings on sand. J Geotech Eng. 1990;116(12):1851–63.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 572 PDF Download: 123 |
||||
