An Assessment Framework for Time Based Vitality of Public Parks

Rouhi, M., Monfared, M. R., & Forsat, M. (2016). Measuring Public Satisfaction on Urban Parks (A case Study:
Sari City). Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 458.
2. Jalaladdini, S., & Oktay, D. (2012). Urban Public Spaces and Vitality: A Socio-Spatial Analysis in the Streets of
Cypriot Towns. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 35, 665-667.
3. Zaidin, N., Tukiman, I., Shahli, F. M., & Hussain, M. R. (2016). Place Attachment in Relation to Urban Street
Vitality. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12-
13.
4. Zakerhaghighi, K. (2019). Urban vitality evaluation in Vali Asr crossroad on the basis of activity patterns. The
Scientic Journal of NAZAR research center (Nrc) for Art, Architecture & Urbanism, 5-11.
5. Azeri, A. R., Aladini, M., & Mozhdehi, M. A. (2018). Investigating the Role of Space Factors in Promoting Vitality
for Designing Sports Complex. Civil Engineering Journal. Vol. 4, No. 7, 1740-1741.
6. Yan, Y., Zhu, J., Lu, H., Zheng, T., Rong, Yuejing, W. C., . . . Tang, L. (2020). Vitality of Urban Parks and Its
Influencing Factors from the Perspective of Recreational Service Supply, Demand, and Spatial Links. International
journal of environmental research and public health, Vol. 17, Issue No. 1615, 1-4.
7. Isiklar, S. (2017). Vitality of the cities. International Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 18,22.
8. ORUÇ, G., & GİRİTLİOĞLU, C. (2007). The evaluation of urban quality and vitality of the Istanbul historical
peninsula- Eminönü district. ITU A|Z. VOL: 5 NO: 1, 99-100.
9. Karami, S., Fakhrayee, A., & Karami, S. (2015). Studying the Effect of Accessibility and Vitality on Urban Space
Efficiency in Iran (Case Study: Hamadan City). International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, Vol.5,
No.1, 36-37.
10. Nasri, S. R., & Kolour, S. I. (2015). Evaluation of effective factors on vitality of public spaces of new cities with
emphasis on identity concept. Science Journal (CSJ), Vol. 36, No: 6 , 513-514.
11. Xia, C., Zhang, A., Chu, J., Lin, J., Li, W., & Wu, J. (2019). Portraying urban landscape: A quantitative analysis
system applied in fifteen metropolises in China. Sustainable Cities and Socities, Vol. 46.
12. Hikmah, Nday, R. U., & Manu, A. K. (2018). Vitality of Public Open Space (Case Study: Taman Nostalgia Kupang).
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 4, S1, 125.
13. Zhang, A., Xia, C., & Yeh, A. G.-O. (2020). Analyzing spatial relationships between urban land use intensity and
urban vitality at street block level: A case study of five Chinese megacities. Landscape & Urban Planning, Vol. 193,
2-3.
14. Zakerhaghighi, K. (2019). Urban vitality evaluation in Vali Asr crossroad on the basis of activity patterns . The
Scientic Journal of NAZAR research center (Nrc) for Art, Architecture & Urbanism, 5-11.
15. Rastegar, N., Ahmad, M., & Malek, M. (2014). Factors affecting the vitality of streets in downtown Johor Bahru
City. Indian Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 07, Issue NO. 01, 4-5.
Wu, C.-K., & Song, L.-Y. (2017). A case for inclusive design: Analyzing the needs of those who frequent Taiwan’s
urban parks. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 58, 254.
17. Aval, H. S. (2015). Urban space designing for more vitality (Case study: Ferdosi. St in Zabol). Science Journal,
4154-4156.
18. Razak, M., Othman, N., & Nazir, N. (2016). Connecting People with Nature: Urban Park and Human Well-being.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 222, 476.
19. Cohen, D., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Derose, K. P., Martinez, H., Setodji, C., & McKenzie, T. (2009). Parks and
physical activity: Why are some parks used more than others? Preventive Medicine , 2.
20. N, L., JY, L., HW, Y., T, S., & Y, L. (2014). Analysis on accessibility of urban park green space: the case study of
Shenyang Tiexi District. The Journal of Applied Ecology, Issue No. 10.
21. Swank, B. M., Mozaffar, F., Faizi, M., & Rayatidamavandi, M. (2016). Assessing Design Principles of Urban Parks
in Iran for Promoting Women’s Satisfaction. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Vol. 03, Issue
No. 02, 1461-1463.
22. Liang, H., Chen, D., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Walking accessibility of urban parks in a compact megacity. Proceedings
of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning, Vol. 170, Issue No. 02, 2,6 .
23. Sakip, S. R., Akhir, N. M., & Omar, S. S. (2015). Determinant Factors of Successful Public Parks in Malaysia.
Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 170, 422-428.
24. Begum, H., & Sharna, F. K. (2018). Factors Influencing Public Accessibility to Community Open Spaces in Dhaka
City: A Case Study of Mirpur Budhhijibi Complex in Dhaka. The International Journal of Social Sciences and
Humanities Invention, Vol. 05, Issue No. 05, 4759-4760.
25. Rao, P., & Puntambekar, K. (2014). Evaluating the urban green space benefits and functions at macro, meso and
mirco level: Case of Bhopal City. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Vol. 03, Issue No.
06, 360-361.
26. Rahman, K. M., & Zhang, D. (2018). Analyzing the Level of Accessibility of Public Urban Green Spaces to Different
Socially Vulnerable Groups of People. Sustainability, Vol. 10, 3,5.
27. Zhou, W., & Zhang, S. (2018). Recreational visits to urban parks and factors affecting park visits: Evidence from
geotagged social media data. Landscape and urban planning, 1.
28. Wang, D., Brown, G., & Liu, Y. (2015). The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to
urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 133, 53.
29. Wang, D. (2015). Rethinking Planning for Urban Parks: Accessbility, Use and Behaviour. 1,18,23.
30. Ujang, N., & Moulay, A. (2016). Legibility of neighborhood parks and its impact on social interaction in a planned
residential area. International Journal of Architectural Research, Vol. 10, Issue No. 01, 185-188.
31. Özkan, D. G., Akyol, D., & Çiğdem, A. (2018). Legibility of Neighborhood Park: A Case Study of Trabzon City
Centre. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Science, Vol. 11, 171.
32. Nunes, D. V., & Vale, D. S. (2015). Physical characteristics that influence urba ndesign qualities of livable and
walkable urban places: Lessons from Portuguese cities. Making cities livable: Achieving green healhy cities, (p. 5).
Bristol, UK.
33. Mohamed, A. A. (2010). Spatial conditions for sustainable communities: The case of infromal settlements in GCR.
43-44.
34. Moulay, A., Said, I., & Ujang, N. (2017). Legibility of neighborhood parks as a predicator for enhanced social
interaction towards social sustainability . Cities, Vol. 61, 58.
35. Swank, B. M., Mozaffar, F., Faizi, M., & Rayatidamavandi, M. (2016). Assessing Design Principles of Urban Parks
in Iran for Promoting Women’s Satisfaction. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Vol. 03,
Issue No. 02, 1461-1463.
36. Maruthaveeran, S., & Konijnendijk, C. C. (2015). Fear of crime in urban parks – What the residents of Kuala Lumpur
have to say? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 14, Issue No.03, 702.
37. Mahrous, A. M., Moustafa, Y. M., & Abou El-Ela, M. A. (2018). Physical characteristics and perceived security in
urban parks: Investigation in the Egyptian context. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, Vol. 09, 3055-3056.
38. Hashim, N. H., Thani, S. K., Jamaludin, M. A., & Yatim, N. M. (2016). A Perceptual Study on the Influence of
Vegetation Design towards Women's Safety in Public Park. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 234,
280-283.
39. Konijnendijk, C. C., & Maruthaveeran, S. (2014). A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban green
spaces – A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 13, 4-5.
40. Łopuszyńska, A., & Zielińska, M. B. (2019). Lighting of urban green areas – the case of Grabiszyn Park in Wrocław.
Searching for the balance between light and darkness through social and technical issues. E3S Web of Conferences
100 (pp. 1-4). EDP Sciences.
41. Mccormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of Urban Parks Associated with
Park Use and Physical Activity: A Review of Qualitative Research. Health & Place, Vol. 16, 712-723.
42. Kara, B., Tuncay, H. E., & Deniz, B. (2011). Investigating recreational qualities of the parks in Aydin. Procedia-
Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 19, 160.
43. Ayeghi, A., & Ujang, N. (2014). The impact of physical features on user attachment to Kuala Lumpur. Malaysian
Journal of Society and Space, Vol. 10, Issue No. 03, 44-46.
44. Ujang, N., Moulay, A., & Zakariya, K. (2015). Sense of Well-Being Indicators: Attachment to public parks in
Putrajaya, Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 202, 487-493.
45. Rossi, S. D. (2014). Factors affecting people-park relationships in peri-urban national parks. 7,8,11,38.
46. Zengel, R., & DOĞRUSOY, İ. T. (2017). Analysis Of Perceived Safety In Urban Parks: A Field Study In Büyükpark
and Hasanağa Park. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture (34:1), 63-66.
47. Cowan, R., Hill, D., & Chapman, D. (2005). Start with the park: Creating sustainable urban green spaces in areas
of housing growth and renewal. London: CABE space.
48. Li, C.-L. (2020). Quality of life: The perspective of urban park recreation in three Asian cities. Journal of Outdoor
Recreation and Tourism, Vol. 29, 1.
49. Gu, X., Li, Q., & Chand, S. (2020). Factors influencing residents’ access to and use of country parks in Shanghai,
China. Cities, Vol. 97, 1.
50. Cohen, D., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Derose, K. P., Martinez, H., Setodji, C., & McKenzie, T. (2009). Parks and
physical activity: Why are some parks used more than others? Preventive Medicine , 2.
51. Sreetheran, M. (2017). Exploring the urban park use, preference and behaviours among the residents of Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 25, 85.
52. Soltanian, F., & Mohammadi, A. (2015). Study of characteristics of urban public open spaces based on social
interaction (Case study: Salavatabad’s 3-kilometer route). European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences
2015, Vol. 04, Issue No. 03, 554-555.
53. Lynch, K. (1985). What time is this place? Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT press, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology .
54. Mareggi, M. (2013). Space-Time Design of the Public City. London: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
55. Su, S., Li, Z., Wei, H., Wu, Y., Wang, W., & Qu, C. (2019). Impact of community deprivation on urban park access
over time: Understanding the relative role of contributors for urban planning. Habitat International, Vol. 92.
56. Zhang, L., Long, Y., & Liu, S. (2019). Urban Vitality Area Identification and Pattern Analysis from the Perspective
of Time and Space Fusion. Sustainability, Vol. 03, 1-3.
57. Wu, C., Ye, X., Ren, F., & Du, Q. (2018). Check-in behaviour and spatio-temporal vibrancy: An exploratory analysis
in Shenzhen, China. Cities, Vol. 77, Issue No. , 104.
58. Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design . Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 03, Issue
No. 01, 96.
59. Hagenbjörk, L. (2011). An analyse of Chinese urban public space-Beijing as an example. 21.
60. Xu, X., Guan, P., Xu, X., Ren, Y., Wang, W., & Xu, N. (2018). The cause and evolution of urban street vitality under
the time dimension: Nine cases of streets in Nanjing City, China. Sustainability, Vol. 10, 2.
61. Hague, C., & Jenkins, P. (2004). Place Identity, Participation and Planning. London: Routledge.
62. Ngesan, M. R., Abdul Karim, H., & Zubir, S. S. (2018). Relationship between Nighttime Leisure Behaviour and
Urban Park Setting in Shah Alam . Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies, Vol. 03, Issue No. 09, 175.
63. Seamon, D., & Sowers, J. (2008). Place and Placelessness (1976): Edward Relph. In E. Relph, Key Texts in Human
Geography . London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
64. Talavera, R. (2012). Improving pedestrian accessibility to public space through space syntax analysis. 8th Space
Syntax Symposium (p. 2). Santiago de Chile: PUC.
65. Momenian, A., & Zekavat, M. (2012). Rehumanasing Urban Space for Night Activities with Particular Reference to
Principal 24 hours Cities in Iran. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, Issue
No. 23, 5056-5061.
66. Tu, X., Huang, G., Wu, J., & Guo, X. (2020). How do travel distance and park size influence urban park visits?
Urban Forestery & Urban Greening, Vol. 52, 1.
67. Pottharst, M., & Konecke, B. (2013). Space-Time Design of the Public City. London: Springer Science+Business
Media Dordrecht.
68. Jia, B., & Qiu, K. (2020). The roles of landscape both inside the park and the surroundings in park cooling effect.
Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 52 , 2.
69. Prabhakaran, D., Mukherjee, D., Safraj, S., Tayyab, M., Roopa, S., Patel, S. A., . . . Tandon, N. (2017). Park
availability and major depression in individuals with chronic conditions: Is there an association in urban India?
Health & Place, Vol. 47, 55-56.
70. Setyowati, E., Harani, A. R., & Falah, Y. N. (2013). The Application of Pedestrian Ways Design Concepts as an
Implementation of Sustainable Urban Open Spaces. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 85, 346-350.
71. Nasir, R. A., Ahmad, S. S., & Ahmed, A. Z. (2013). Physical Activity and Human Comfort Correlation in an Urban
Park in Hot and Humid Conditions . Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 105, 599.
72. Yilmaz, E. S., & Yilmaz, S. (2019). A review of urbanization, pollution and biodiversity in Izmir. International
Journal of Environmental Trends (IJENT), Vol. 03, Issue No.01, 32-33.
73. Municipality, I. M. (2020, April 15). The city of beauty and fertility . Retrieved from Imzir Metropolitan
Municipality: http://www.izmir.bel.tr/CKYuklenen/icerik_sayfalari/adayinizmir_2018_08.pdf
74. Nurlu, E., Kara, B., & Sarıçam, S. (2011). The role of education on environmental consciousness: A case study in
Izmir, Turkey. Journal of food, agriculture and environment, Vol. 09, Issue No.02, 681.
75. Turel, H. S., Yigit, E. M., & Altug, I. (2007 ). Evaluation of elderly people’s requirements in public open spaces: A
case study in Bornova District (Izmir, Turkey). Building and Environment, Vol. 42, 2037-2039.
76. ŞAŞMAZ, E. (2020, April 16). BIG PARK - BORNOVA. Retrieved from erolsasmaz.com:
https://www.erolsasmaz.com/?oku=968
77. ZENGEL, R., & DOĞRUSOY, İ. T. (2014). The importance of sociocultural habits in park design, leisure behaviour
and user satisfaction. A comparative study on two parks in Izmir, Turkey. Journal of Settlements and Spatial
Planning, Vol. 05, Isuue No. 02, 107-115.
78. SonDakika. (2020, April 15). Bornova Big Park Renovated. Retrieved from SonDakika:
https://www.sondakika.com/haber/haber-bornova-buyuk-park-yenilendi/
79. Foundation, U. M. (2020, April 15). About the foundation. Retrieved from Uğur Mumcu Researcher Journalism
Foundation: http://www.umag.org.tr/tr/vakif/15/vakif-hakkinda
80. Yazer, H. (2020, April 15). Ayfer Feray. Retrieved from tsa 'Center for Turkish Cinema Studies' :
https://www.tsa.org.tr/en/kisi/kisibio/538/ayfer-feray