A STUDY CONTAINS AN EVALUATION OF THE ROLE OF NGO IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL RICHTS OF CITIZENS - SOCIAL STUDY IN AN URPAN ENVIRONMENT AND OTHER RURAL | ||||
| Journal of Environmental Science | ||||
| Article 12, Volume 41, Issue 3, March 2018, Page 271-292 PDF (423.81 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Review Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jes.2018.21786 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Awad, M. I1; El-Sayed, T. A2; Borham, Ghadeer, E | ||||
| 1Institute of Environmental Studies and Research, Ain Shams University | ||||
| 2General Union of NGOS | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The study aims to determine the impact of NGOs in educating citizens in preserving the environment in the rural and urban society. The study population of Dakahlia (a group of environmental NGOs) reached 72 associations, 37 of which are urban and 35 rural. And the number of 482 beneficiaries in these associations. The study uses more than one approach, the most important of which is the social survey in both the comprehensive and the sample. Two measures were designed, the first is to measure the efficiency of the workmen of the society, and the second is to measure the effectiveness of the beneficiaries of the services of these associations. The study reached a set of results that can be summarized as: The results of the first hypothesis test: "No significant differences are statistically significant between the efficiency of the role of environmental NGOs in protecting the environmental rights of citizens between rural and urban", while the alternative hypothesis H1 ("There are differences A significant statistical function between the efficiency of the role of environmental NGOs in protecting the environmental rights of citizens between rural and urban. "The acceptance of the null hypothesis and the rejection of the alternative hypothesis of the clarity of the objectives of the association in protecting the environmental rights of citizens in both rural and urban areas became apparent. Thus, the results of the second hypothesis test (null hypothesis HO) show that there are no statistically significant differences between the effectiveness of the role of environmental NGOs in protecting the environmental rights of citizens benefiting from their rural / urban services, while alternative hypothesis H1 ("There are significant differences statistically significant Between the effectiveness of the role of environmental NGOs in protecting the environmental rights of citizens benefiting from their services between rural and urban. " Where the results of the study confirmed acceptance of the alternative hypothesis and rejection of nullity. The study reached a number of recommendations, The need to prepare awareness programs covering all types of pollution, to allow more volunteers, to ensure the participation of women in environmental activities, the use of specialists in the field of environmental protection, the inclusion of education curricula on the basic material for the environment. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 180 PDF Download: 582 |
||||
