Renal Graft Vesicoureteral Reflux Survival and Oucome in Pediatric Recipients; Single Centre Experience | ||||
Minia Journal of Medical Research | ||||
Volume 31, Issue 4, October 2020, Page 178-188 PDF (333.86 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.217924 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Hosny S. Abd El-Ghany1; Enas A. Abdel Gawad2; Mohamed M. Esmaeel3; Mahmoud M. Moneer2; Alaa W. Fathy4; Mohmamed H. Kasem5; Tarek KH. Fathelbab5; Fatina Fadel6; Hani Abdel-Raouf Morsi7; Ayman F. Hussein5 | ||||
1Department of Radiology, El-Minia Faculty of medicine, El-Minia- Egypt. | ||||
2Department of Radiology, El-Minia Faculty of medicine, El-Minia- Egypt | ||||
3Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, El-Minia Faculty of medicine, El-Minia- Egypt | ||||
4Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, El-Minia Faculty of medicine, El-Minia- Egypt. | ||||
5Department of Urology, Minia University Hospitals, Minia, Egypt | ||||
6Pediatric renal transplantation unit, Cairo children's hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
7Department of Pediatric Urology, Cairo children's hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate pediatric post transplant vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in terms of graft's Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) episodes, graft outcome and survival in comparison to grafts that don't have reflux. Subjects and Methods: A total of 145 pediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our transplantation unit between 2008 and January 2019 and suited our inclusion criteria were included in this retrospective cohort study and a voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) was done to them and categorized into main groups; group (A) refluxing graft group (n=66) and group (B) non refluxing graft group (n=79). Baseline donor and recipient demographic characteristics, post transplant serum creatinine level at different points, graft outcome, and UTIs were listed. Post transplantation (Tx) UTIs and graft outcome were compared between both groups. Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) was measured using Shwartz formula. Frequency- Volume Chart (FVC) and UroDynamic Study (UDS) were used to identify Lower urinary Tract (LUT) condition and helped us regarding decision making in management of graft VUR. Results: Mean ±SD age at time of Tx was 8.7±3.4y in group A versus 8.9±2.8y in group B, P value=0.667. Regarding sex, 46 patients (69.7%) were male in group A, while 56(70.9%) were male in group B, p value = 0.876. UTI occurrence was similar between groups {40(60.6%) patients in group A versus 49 (62%) patients in group B, P value=0.861 but UTIs episodes (more than 3 episode per year) was 20 (30.3%) patients in group A versus 1(1.3%) patient, P value =0.001. Both groups were similar in terms of 5-year (100% versus 98.5%), and 10-year (76.2% versus 84.7%) graft survival. Conclusions: There was no difference between refluxing and non refluxing graft in terms of UTIs occurrence, graft function and survival. Frequency of UTI episodes was more in the refluxing graft like any native kidney primary VUR. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Renal transplantation; graft veisicoureteral reflux; graft VUR outcome, graft VUR treatment | ||||
Supplementary Files
|
||||
Statistics Article View: 54 PDF Download: 96 |
||||