Anti-Bacterial Effect of Different Root Canal Sealer Against Newly Introduced Bio-Ceramic Sealer. | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 3, Volume 68, Issue 1 - Serial Number 5, January 2022, Page 981-984 PDF (237.35 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.97032.1794 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Medhat Elfaramawy   1; Shady Hussein 1; Nesma Hamdi 2
| ||||
| 1Associate Professor, Endodontic Dep., Faculty of dentistry, Ainshams Univ. | ||||
| 2Department of Microbiology. Faculty of Medicine. Ain Shams University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Aim of the study: was to compare the antibacterial effect of Ceraseal (bio-ceramic sealer.) versus AD seal (Resin based sealer) and Zinc oxide and eugenol sealer against E-faecalis using agar diffusion method. Materials and methods: Samples were classified into 3 groups according to the material used as follows Group 1 Ceraseal sealer , Group 2: AD seal and group 3; Zno & E sealer. Each group was classified into three subgroups according to the observation periods into (1day, 3days and 7 days). Each group consisted of 7 agar plates implanted with E-faecalis strain. 3 holes were created in each agar plate each hole contained one tested material. During the observation period each plate was incubated at 37°C. till evaluation. The results showed that the Ceraseal is the only sealer exhibited an inhibitory zone at all intervals while AD seal and ZnO&E exhibited no antibacterial activity. It has been concluded that Bioceramic sealer has higher inhibitory effect on E-faecalis than both Resin and ZnO&E sealers. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Bioceramic; Resin; Antibacterial | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 293 PDF Download: 224 |
||||
