COMPARATIVE STUDIES BETWEEN PREDATORY MITES AND PESTICIDES IN CONTROLLING Tetranychus urticae KOCH ON STRAWBERRY PLANTS AT QALUBIA GOVERNORATE | ||||
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology | ||||
Article 13, Volume 32, Issue 4, April 2007, Page 3133-3140 PDF (577.35 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2007.219503 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
E. M.A. EL-Saiedy,1; Amal H.M. Romeih,2 | ||||
1National Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
2Dept. of zoology and agricultural nematology-Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ., Giza | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Seven treatments; phytosiulus macropilis Banks, Amblyseius californicus, Parok, Akkomic, Shilinger, Agromactin and Ortus were used to control Tetranychus urticae Koch on two strawberry cultivars, Sweet-Charlie and Camarosa in Qalubia Governorate. On Sweet-Charlie cultivar the results showing that the reduction percentage of movement stages was the highest when use Agromactin (80.55%) and Ortus (78.29%) for eggs; on the contrary it was the lowest when use Shilinger (54.72%) and Akkomic (68.95%) for movement and eggs, respectively. On Camarosa cultivar the reduction percentage was the highest when use parok (77.40% & 78.18%) for movement stages and eggs, respectively, while it was the lowest when used Shilinger (68.22%) and Ortus (69.07%) for movement stages and eggs, respectively. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
phytosiulus macropilis; Amblyseius californicus; Parok; Akkomic; Shilinger; Agromactin Ortus; Tetetranychus .urticae | ||||
Statistics Article View: 40 PDF Download: 177 |
||||