Comparative study between enhanced recovery and conventional protocols in colorectal surgery | ||||
| Minia Journal of Medical Research | ||||
| Volume 31, Issue 3, July 2020, Page 337-339 PDF (345.66 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.220314 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Abdel fattah S. Abdel fattah; Ahmed M. Atia; Doaa A. Saad; Mostafa A. Ismail Gebaly | ||||
| Department of General Surgery, El-Minia Faculty of Medicine | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal Perioperative care pathway aiming to decrease the stress response during the surgical procedure to facilitate the maintenance of preoperative bodily compositions and organ function and to achieve early recovery. Aim of the work: To compare the outcomes between enhanced recovery and traditional protocols of management after colorectal surgery. Patients and methods: This study included 40 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, 20 patients managed by enhanced recovery and 20 patients managed by conventional protocols. Results: Patients managed by enhanced recovery have the same post-operative complications and less duration of hospital stay. Conclusion: Patients managed by enhanced recovery have comparable post-operative complications as the patients managed with traditional protocols and less duration of hospital stay. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| colorectal surgery; post-operative; traditional protocols | ||||
|
Supplementary Files
|
||||
|
Statistics Article View: 83 PDF Download: 168 |
||||
