Mild Ovarian Stimulation Strategy versus conventional ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responder Women Undergoing ICSI | ||||
| Minia Journal of Medical Research | ||||
| Volume 31, Issue 1, January 2020, Page 76-80 PDF (239.15 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.221400 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Faten A. F. Zahran; Mohamed Abd Allah; Mahmoud H. Ibrahim; Abd EL-Rahman H. Abd El-Wahab | ||||
| Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine – Minia University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: One of the most frustrating problems in IVF today is the low pregnancy rate in women with poor ovarian response (Webb et al., 2016). Poor responders are estimated to comprise approximately 9-24% of IVF/ICSI patients (Papathanasiou et al., 2016). Aim of the Work: The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of a mild ovarian stimulation strategy versus a conventional ovarian stimulation in women with poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI. Patients and Methods: This study conducted at the Nile Infertility Centre during the period between January 2018 and February 2019.The trial protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Minia University (approval no. MUEOB0016). Results: Our study was carried at Nile Infertility Center during the period between January 2018 and February 2019.The study included a total of 170 infertile women with an indication for ICSI and characterized as poor responsders according to the Bologna criteria. In conclusion, Mild ovarian stimulation reduce patients‟ burden of frequent injections, in terms of embryo quality, pregnancy rate, and cost mild ovarian stimulation is a promising alternative to conventional ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Mild ovarian stimulation; poor ovarian responders | ||||
|
Supplementary Files
|
||||
|
Statistics Article View: 57 PDF Download: 117 |
||||
