Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in obesity
Mohamed, T., Abdel- Razik, S., Hassanien, A., Tohamy, T., Abdel Azeem, A., Zaazou, M. (2020). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in obesity. EKB Journal Management System, 31(1), 231-235. doi: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.221507
Tantawi A. Mohamed; Salah Abdel- Razik; Ayman M. Hassanien; Tohamy A. Tohamy; Ashraf Abdel Azeem; Mohamed M. Taha Zaazou. "Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in obesity". EKB Journal Management System, 31, 1, 2020, 231-235. doi: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.221507
Mohamed, T., Abdel- Razik, S., Hassanien, A., Tohamy, T., Abdel Azeem, A., Zaazou, M. (2020). 'Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in obesity', EKB Journal Management System, 31(1), pp. 231-235. doi: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.221507
Mohamed, T., Abdel- Razik, S., Hassanien, A., Tohamy, T., Abdel Azeem, A., Zaazou, M. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in obesity. EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 31(1): 231-235. doi: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.221507

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in obesity

Minia Journal of Medical Research
Volume 31, Issue 1, January 2020, Page 231-235  XML PDF (271.64 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.221507
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Tantawi A. Mohamed1; Salah Abdel- Razik2; Ayman M. Hassanien1; Tohamy A. Tohamy1; Ashraf Abdel Azeem1; Mohamed M. Taha Zaazou3
1Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine ,El Minia UniversityHospital, Egypt
2Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine ,El Minia UniversityHospital, Egyp
3Department of General Surgery,Faculty of Medicine, Misr University for Science and Technology; Egypt
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic mini‑gastric bypass (MGBP) is gaining popularity among the bariatric
procedures today, andlaparoscopic sleevegastrectomy(SG) as a single‑stageprocedure forthe treatment 
of morbid obesity is becoming increasingly popular. Patients and methods: Between October 2014 
and July 2018, 100 obese patients were randomized, operated upon, and followed up for 24 months 
in Al Minia University Hospital. A total of 50 patients underwent SG, and 50 patients underwent 
MGBP. The mean BMI of all patients was 47.8 ± 5.5 kg/m2, their mean age was 30 ± 8.3 years, and
80% of them were female. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months. 
Results: Age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities were equal. The mean operative time for SG was 86.9 ± 
51.6 min and that for MGBP was 108.4 ± 41.8 min; the percentage of 1‑year excess weight loss was
similar (76.2 ± 4.49% for SG and 80.3 ± 8.3% for MGBP). The comorbidities were significantly 
improved after both procedures, except for type 2 diabetes mellitus, which showed a higher 
resolution rate after MGBP. Conclusion: Laparoscopic SG regarding excess weight loss is 
comparable to laparoscopic MGBP in short‑termfollow‑up (2 year) with less metabolic effect. Further
long‑termstudies are needed.

Keywords
comorbidities; diabetes mellitus; mini‑gastric bypass
Supplementary Files
Statistics
Article View: 51
PDF Download: 71